PALATIN TECHNOLOGIES INC PTN (last ticker on record)
CIK 911216Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Sep 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jul 2004 to May 2025
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Thompson Hine LLPFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Thompson & KnightFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 198 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Dec 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Graham & James LLPFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.20× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Rubin Baum Levin Constant & FriedmanFirst linked Nov 1997 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 1.91× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Wiley ReinFirst linked Oct 2014 · Text search only · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Lowenstein SandlerFirst linked Feb 2011 · Text search only · 297 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thompson Hine LLP | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 208 | 0.95 | 0.64 | 1.09 |
| Thompson & Knight | Mar 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 198 | 1.03 | 0.40 | 1.38 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Dec 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Graham & James LLP | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 42 | 0.20 | 0.38 | 1.46 |
| Rubin Baum Levin Constant & Friedman | Nov 1997 | Named in a filing | 17 | 1.45 | 1.91 | 1.31 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Wiley Rein | Oct 2014 | Text search only | 38 | 0.86 | 0.52 | 1.15 |
| Lowenstein Sandler | Feb 2011 | Text search only | 297 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Naveen PogulaThompson Hine LLPFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Peter A. LodwickThompson & KnightFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
- Faith L. CharlesThompson Hine LLPFirst linked Dec 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- David L. FicksmanTroyGould PCFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 1.80× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- John D. HogoboomLowenstein SandlerFirst linked Feb 2011 · Text search only · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 1.07× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naveen PogulaThompson Hine LLP | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| Peter A. LodwickThompson & Knight | Mar 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 1.58 | 0.00 | 1.65 |
| Faith L. CharlesThompson Hine LLP | Dec 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| David L. FicksmanTroyGould PC | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 58 | 0.91 | 1.80 | 0.96 |
| John D. HogoboomLowenstein Sandler | Feb 2011 | Text search only | 49 | 0.59 | 1.07 | 1.17 |