ONLINE RESOURCES CORP ORCC (last ticker on record)
CIK 888953Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Morris, Manning & Martin, LLPFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in a filing · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Mar 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Feb 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Squire Sanders (US)First linked Feb 2005 · Named in a filing · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Dec 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Patton BoggsFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Nov 2006 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP | Jul 2012 | Named in a filing | 105 | 0.58 | 0.34 | 0.86 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Mar 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Feb 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Oct 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Squire Sanders (US) | Feb 2005 | Named in a filing | 199 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 1.13 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Dec 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Patton Boggs | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 186 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 1.35 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Nov 2006 | Text search only | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert A. ProfusekJones DayFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- David M. CalhounMorris, Manning & Martin, LLPFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- Jonathan I. MarkCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Mar 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Eduardo GallardoGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Feb 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.39×
- James J. MaiwurmSquire Sanders (US)First linked Feb 2005 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Mark J. WishnerGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 1.74× · 95% wipeout 2.24×
- Joseph G. Passaic Jr.Patton BoggsFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 1.20× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Mary M. SjoquistPatton BoggsFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 1.43× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert A. ProfusekJones Day | Mar 2013 | Named in a filing | 47 | 1.41 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| David M. CalhounMorris, Manning & Martin, LLP | Jul 2012 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.55 |
| Jonathan I. MarkCahill Gordon & Reindel | Mar 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Eduardo GallardoGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Feb 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.96 | 0.00 | 0.39 |
| James J. MaiwurmSquire Sanders (US) | Feb 2005 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Mark J. WishnerGreenberg Traurig | Jun 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.64 | 1.74 | 2.24 |
| Joseph G. Passaic Jr.Patton Boggs | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.19 | 1.20 | 1.08 |
| Mary M. SjoquistPatton Boggs | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.84 | 1.43 | 1.01 |