DMK PHARMACEUTICALS Corp DMK (last ticker on record)
CIK 887247Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 5
- Newest began Jul 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- May 2016 to Nov 2023
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Jul 2023 · Named in a filing · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Weintraub Tobin Chediak Coleman Grodin Law CorporationFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 2.69× · 95% wipeout 1.98×
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Jan 2009 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Jul 2023 | Named in a filing | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| K&L Gates | Nov 2013 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Weintraub Tobin Chediak Coleman Grodin Law Corporation | Nov 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.31 | 2.69 | 1.98 |
| Fenwick & West LLP | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Jan 2009 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ivan K. BlumenthalMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Jul 2023 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- Teri O'BrienPaul HastingsFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- David B. AllenK&L GatesFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- C. Kevin KelsoFenwick & West LLPFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.18× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan K. BlumenthalMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Jul 2023 | Named in a filing | 29 | 1.31 | 0.00 | 1.61 |
| Teri O'BrienPaul Hastings | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 1.61 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| David B. AllenK&L Gates | Nov 2013 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.48 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| C. Kevin KelsoFenwick & West LLP | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 3.18 | 1.66 | 1.61 |