AOL LLC
CIK 883780Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 1,397 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Apr 1999 · Named in a filing · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 1999 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Oct 1996 · Named in a filing · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 1,397 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 0.88 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Apr 1999 | Named in a filing | 500 | 1.10 | 0.61 | 1.06 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 1999 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Oct 1996 | Named in a filing | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.18 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.82 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Philip T. Ruegger IIISimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Louis A. GoodmanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 1999 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- William P. Rogers Jr.Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philip T. Ruegger IIISimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Louis A. GoodmanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 1999 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.40 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| William P. Rogers Jr.Cravath Swaine & Moore | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 33 | 1.65 | 0.00 | 0.88 |