CLEAN HARBORS INC CLH (last ticker on record)
CIK 822818Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in a filing · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- DAVIS, MALM & D'AGOSTINE, P.C.First linked Jun 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
- Reed SmithFirst linked May 2016 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Sep 2012 · Text search only · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Nov 2005 | Named in a filing | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| DAVIS, MALM & D'AGOSTINE, P.C. | Jun 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.89 |
| Reed Smith | May 2016 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Sep 2012 | Text search only | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John A. TripodoroCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.29×
- John D. ChamblissFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John A. TripodoroCahill Gordon & Reindel | Nov 2005 | Named in a filing | 36 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.29 |
| John D. Chambliss | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.56 |