Imunon, Inc. IMNN (last ticker on record)
CIK 749647Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- May 2025 to Oct 2026
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Thompson Hine LLPFirst linked Mar 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Dec 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Jun 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked May 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Seyfarth ShawFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Venable LLPFirst linked Dec 2000 · Named in a filing · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked May 2024 · Text search only · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked May 2017 · Text search only · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thompson Hine LLP | Mar 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 208 | 0.95 | 0.64 | 1.09 |
| Covington & Burling | Dec 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Jun 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Goodwin Procter | Aug 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Sidley Austin | May 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Jul 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Seyfarth Shaw | Sep 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 102 | 1.57 | 1.38 | 1.25 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Venable LLP | Dec 2000 | Named in a filing | 506 | 0.79 | 0.38 | 0.73 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | May 2024 | Text search only | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | May 2017 | Text search only | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sarah C. GriffithsCovington & BurlingFirst linked Oct 2026 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Megan N. GatesMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Dec 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Michael J. RiellaCovington & BurlingFirst linked Dec 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Steven CannerBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Jul 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Jeffrey J. FesslerSheppard MullinFirst linked Jan 2017 · Named in a filing · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Sam ZuckerGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Blake HornickSeyfarth ShawFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.79×
- Thomas D. Washburne Jr.Venable LLPFirst linked Jan 2007 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Melissa Allison WarrenVenable LLPFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarah C. GriffithsCovington & Burling | Oct 2026 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Megan N. GatesMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Dec 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 1.46 |
| Michael J. RiellaCovington & Burling | Dec 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| Steven CannerBaker & McKenzie | Jul 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 3.89 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Jeffrey J. FesslerSheppard Mullin | Jan 2017 | Named in a filing | 56 | 0.86 | 0.37 | 1.21 |
| Sam ZuckerGoodwin Procter | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Blake HornickSeyfarth Shaw | Mar 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.79 |
| Thomas D. Washburne Jr.Venable LLP | Jan 2007 | Named in a filing | 8 | 2.46 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Melissa Allison WarrenVenable LLP | Jul 2005 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 0.66 |