PANERA BREAD CO PNRA (last ticker on record)
CIK 724606Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in a filing · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Gadsby Hannah LLPFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 2.39×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Mar 2015 | Named in a filing | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| HALE AND DORR | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Bryan Cave | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Gadsby Hannah LLP | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.60 | 0.78 | 2.39 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jonathan WolfmanWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- David A. WestenbergWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- R. Randall WangBryan CaveFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Marianne GilleranGadsby Hannah LLPFirst linked Jul 1997 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 4.34× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan WolfmanWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jun 2015 | Named in a filing | 18 | 2.11 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| David A. WestenbergWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 31 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| R. Randall WangBryan Cave | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 28 | 1.34 | 0.00 | 1.14 |
| Marianne GilleranGadsby Hannah LLP | Jul 1997 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 4.34 | 0.00 |