Dynamics Research Corp DRCO (last ticker on record)
CIK 30822Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Nixon PeabodyFirst linked Oct 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Apr 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Apr 2017 · Text search only · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2017 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holland & Knight | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
| Nixon Peabody | Oct 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 196 | 1.13 | 0.78 | 0.90 |
| Ropes & Gray | Apr 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Apr 2017 | Text search only | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2017 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jonathan F. WolcottHolland & KnightFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Richard M. SteinNixon PeabodyFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Richard F. Langan Jr.Nixon PeabodyFirst linked Oct 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 1.67× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Ryan D. ThomasBass, Berry & SimsFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan F. WolcottHolland & Knight | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Richard M. SteinNixon Peabody | Dec 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 2.19 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Richard F. Langan Jr.Nixon Peabody | Oct 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.29 | 1.67 | 1.43 |
| Ryan D. ThomasBass, Berry & Sims | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |