eFFECTOR Therapeutics, Inc. EFTR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1828522Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jun 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Sep 2021 to Oct 2024
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Jun 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Nov 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Ledgewood, PCFirst linked Nov 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Duane MorrisFirst linked Sep 2022 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Barnes & ThornburgFirst linked Jun 2021 · Text search only · 167 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Jun 2021 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jun 2021 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2020 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Jun 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Nov 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Ledgewood, PC | Nov 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 42 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Duane Morris | Sep 2022 | Text search only | 413 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 1.06 |
| Barnes & Thornburg | Jun 2021 | Text search only | 167 | 1.07 | 0.70 | 0.86 |
| HALE AND DORR | Jun 2021 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jun 2021 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Cooley LLP | Nov 2020 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Anthony GostanianLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Scott M. StantonMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.43×
- Marc D. MantellMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Jun 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.92×
- Matthew T. BushLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Ryan J. MaiersonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in a filing · 135 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- William C. HicksMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Jun 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Derick KauffmanLedgewood, PCFirst linked Nov 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Nov 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Mark E. RosensteinLedgewood, PCFirst linked Nov 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Nov 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 416 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- James T. SeeryDuane MorrisFirst linked Sep 2022 · Text search only · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthony GostanianLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| Scott M. StantonMorrison & Foerster | Jul 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 2.79 | 0.00 | 2.43 |
| Marc D. MantellMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Jun 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.92 |
| Matthew T. BushLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 50 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 1.23 |
| Ryan J. MaiersonLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2021 | Named in a filing | 135 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| William C. HicksMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Jun 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Derick KauffmanLedgewood, PC | Nov 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 34 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 0.99 |
| Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Nov 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 338 | 0.95 | 0.66 | 0.95 |
| Mark E. RosensteinLedgewood, PC | Nov 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 38 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Nov 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 416 | 0.78 | 0.42 | 1.04 |
| James T. SeeryDuane Morris | Sep 2022 | Text search only | 76 | 0.87 | 0.00 | 1.14 |