Surrozen, Inc./DE SRZN (last ticker on record)

CIK 1824893Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Restatement
Delisting notice (not a red flag)
95% wipeout

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 2; Newest began Dec 2022
Largest fall in its shares: 96%; Sep 2021 to Nov 2023
Law firms: 5; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 11; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Jul 5, 2023Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jan 5, 2023Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 1, 2022Shares down 95% from their high
Jul 30, 2021Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 14, 2021Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Cooley LLP	May 2021	Named in SEC correspondence	1,634	0.71	0.44	1.24
Goodwin Procter	Sep 2020	Named in SEC correspondence	1,221	0.79	0.31	1.17
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.	Mar 2026	Text search only	567	0.92	0.60	1.20
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati	May 2021	Text search only	1,468	1.09	0.60	1.42
Davis Polk	Sep 2020	Text search only	1,694	1.26	0.06	1.02

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Mark B. WeeksCooley LLP	Dec 2022	Named in a filing	38	0.00	0.61	0.56
John T. McKennaCooley LLP	Mar 2022	Named in SEC correspondence	97	0.53	0.43	1.10
Barbara L. BordenCooley LLP	May 2021	Named in a filing	50	0.89	0.31	0.32
Michael E. TentaCooley LLP	May 2021	Named in SEC correspondence	37	0.40	0.00	1.48
Dan EspinozaGoodwin Procter	Sep 2020	Named in SEC correspondence	35	2.03	0.00	1.00
Jacqueline MercierGoodwin Procter	Sep 2020	Named in SEC correspondence	18	0.85	0.00	0.59
Jocelyn M. ArelGoodwin Procter	Sep 2020	Named in SEC correspondence	63	1.45	0.00	1.44
Michael NordtvedtWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati	Dec 2022	Text search only	42	0.50	0.00	1.29
Mitchell S. BloomGoodwin Procter	May 2021	Text search only	109	0.38	0.00	1.03
Deanna L. KirkpatrickDavis Polk	Sep 2020	Text search only	112	1.74	0.00	0.76
Derek J. DostalDavis Polk	Sep 2020	Text search only	114	1.03	0.00	1.22