Berkshire Grey, Inc. BGRY (last ticker on record)

CIK 1824734Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Restatement
Delisting notice (not a red flag)

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 1; Newest began Apr 2021
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 5; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 14; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Jul 20, 2023Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jan 13, 2023Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jun 10, 2021Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 30, 2021Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Morrison & Foerster	May 2023	Named in SEC correspondence	825	1.17	0.55	1.15
Goodwin Procter	Mar 2021	Named in SEC correspondence	1,221	0.79	0.31	1.17
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Sep 2020	Named in SEC correspondence	2,607	1.15	0.19	0.85
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.	May 2021	Text search only	567	0.92	0.60	1.20
White & Case	Mar 2021	Text search only	907	1.04	0.33	0.91

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
David P. SlotkinMorrison & Foerster	Jun 2023	Named in SEC correspondence	21	1.58	0.00	0.80
Andrew P. CampbellMorrison & Foerster	May 2023	Named in SEC correspondence	20	0.82	0.00	1.33
John T. HaggertyGoodwin Procter	May 2023	Named in SEC correspondence	25	0.38	0.00	0.90
Kenneth A. SiegelMorrison & Foerster	May 2023	Named in SEC correspondence	7	1.01	0.00	0.00
David H. RobertsGoodwin Procter	Sep 2021	Named in SEC correspondence	12	2.21	0.00	0.00
David RobertsO Melveny & Myers LLP	Sep 2021	Named in SEC correspondence	20	0.46	0.00	1.12
Blair T. ThetfordSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Mar 2021	Named in SEC correspondence	15	3.20	0.00	1.19
Jocelyn M. ArelGoodwin Procter	Mar 2021	Named in SEC correspondence	63	1.45	0.00	1.44
Mark S. OpperGoodwin Procter	Mar 2021	Named in SEC correspondence	12	0.00	0.00	0.74
Stephen F. ArcanoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Mar 2021	Named in SEC correspondence	35	1.14	0.00	0.52
Gregg A. NoelSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Sep 2020	Named in SEC correspondence	206	1.74	0.21	0.99
P. Michelle GasawaySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Sep 2020	Named in SEC correspondence	70	1.01	0.00	0.85
Lewis J. GeffenMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.	May 2021	Text search only	17	1.32	0.00	1.08
Dan EspinozaGoodwin Procter	Mar 2021	Text search only	35	2.03	0.00	1.00