TMC the metals Co Inc. TMC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1798562Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fasken MartineauFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in a filing · 126 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Apr 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Stikeman ElliottFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in a filing · 225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Apr 2021 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Feb 2020 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fasken Martineau | Apr 2021 | Named in a filing | 126 | 1.03 | 0.37 | 0.87 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Apr 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Stikeman Elliott | Apr 2021 | Named in a filing | 225 | 1.08 | 0.11 | 1.06 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Feb 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Maples and Calder | Feb 2020 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Mayer Brown | Apr 2021 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Davis Polk | Feb 2020 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Daniel T. KajunskiMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Dec 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Jeffrey P. SchultzMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Oct 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.10× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Julian J. SeiguerKirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Michael L. FantozziMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Apr 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Christian O. NaglerKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2020 · Text search only · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Deanna L. KirkpatrickDavis PolkFirst linked Feb 2020 · Text search only · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Derek J. DostalDavis PolkFirst linked Feb 2020 · Text search only · 114 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Peter S. SeligsonKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2020 · Text search only · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel T. KajunskiMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Dec 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Jeffrey P. SchultzMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Oct 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 46 | 2.10 | 0.66 | 1.53 |
| Julian J. SeiguerKirkland & Ellis | Apr 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 69 | 0.24 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Michael L. FantozziMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Apr 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| Christian O. NaglerKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2020 | Text search only | 260 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Deanna L. KirkpatrickDavis Polk | Feb 2020 | Text search only | 112 | 1.74 | 0.00 | 0.76 |
| Derek J. DostalDavis Polk | Feb 2020 | Text search only | 114 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 1.22 |
| Peter S. SeligsonKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2020 | Text search only | 73 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 1.17 |