FORUM MARKETS Inc FRMM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1690080Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Dec 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jun 2021 to Apr 2025
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Apr 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- The Loev Law Firm, PCFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.16× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Pryor CashmanFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 229 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Nov 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Jan 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Nov 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- The McGeary Law FirmFirst linked Aug 2020 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Cassels Brock & BlackwellFirst linked Nov 2019 · Text search only · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Apr 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| The Loev Law Firm, PC | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 91 | 1.27 | 1.16 | 1.07 |
| Pryor Cashman | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 229 | 1.28 | 1.25 | 1.28 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Nov 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Holland & Knight | Jan 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Nov 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| The McGeary Law Firm | Aug 2020 | Text search only | 25 | 1.07 | 0.54 | 1.14 |
| Cassels Brock & Blackwell | Nov 2019 | Text search only | 102 | 0.99 | 0.79 | 0.77 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stephen P. AlicantiDLA PiperFirst linked Apr 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- David M. LoevThe Loev Law Firm, PCFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 83 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 1.43× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- John S. GilliesThe Loev Law Firm, PCFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in a filing · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- M. Ali PanjwaniPryor CashmanFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.02× · Went dark 2.24× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Michael T. CampoliPryor CashmanFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.85×
- Daniel A. BagliebterMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Nov 2019 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Jeffrey P. SchultzMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Nov 2019 · Named in a filing · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.10× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Kenneth R. KochMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Nov 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.86×
- Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Nov 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Nov 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 416 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Matthew A. GrayEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Nov 2019 · Text search only · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.45×
- Michael A. MiduraEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jun 2017 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen P. AlicantiDLA Piper | Apr 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 42 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.51 |
| David M. LoevThe Loev Law Firm, PC | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 83 | 1.35 | 1.43 | 1.12 |
| John S. GilliesThe Loev Law Firm, PC | Aug 2020 | Named in a filing | 63 | 0.80 | 1.66 | 1.41 |
| M. Ali PanjwaniPryor Cashman | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 80 | 2.02 | 2.24 | 1.25 |
| Michael T. CampoliPryor Cashman | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.97 | 0.00 | 1.85 |
| Daniel A. BagliebterMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Nov 2019 | Named in a filing | 25 | 2.69 | 0.00 | 1.49 |
| Jeffrey P. SchultzMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Nov 2019 | Named in a filing | 46 | 2.10 | 0.66 | 1.53 |
| Kenneth R. KochMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Nov 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 63 | 1.72 | 0.67 | 1.86 |
| Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Nov 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 338 | 0.95 | 0.66 | 0.95 |
| Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Nov 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 416 | 0.78 | 0.42 | 1.04 |
| Matthew A. GrayEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Nov 2019 | Text search only | 42 | 1.43 | 0.00 | 1.45 |
| Michael A. MiduraEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jun 2017 | Text search only | 7 | 2.71 | 0.00 | 2.06 |