Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. CRVS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1626971Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- Mar 2017 to Mar 2023
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Feb 2016 · Text search only · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Dec 2015 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Nov 2015 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Dec 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.23 |
| Davis Polk | Nov 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Feb 2016 | Text search only | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.18 |
| HALE AND DORR | Dec 2015 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Nov 2015 | Text search only | 826 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.14 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Phillip S. StoupLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2022 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.78×
- Miles P. JenningsLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.00×
- Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Kathleen M. WellsLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- James R. TanenbaumMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Nov 2015 · Text search only · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 1.54× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phillip S. StoupLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2022 | Named in a filing | 27 | 1.15 | 0.00 | 1.78 |
| Miles P. JenningsLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.40 | 0.00 | 2.00 |
| Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 95 | 0.60 | 0.19 | 1.28 |
| Kathleen M. WellsLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| James R. TanenbaumMorrison & Foerster | Nov 2015 | Text search only | 46 | 1.41 | 1.54 | 1.06 |