Cogent Biosciences, Inc. COGT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1622229Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Aug 2018 to Mar 2020
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked May 2022 · Named in a filing · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Duane MorrisFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in a filing · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Dec 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Nov 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Charles WilsonFirst linked Nov 2017 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Goulston & StorrsFirst linked Nov 2017 · Text search only · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Nov 2017 · Text search only · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | May 2022 | Named in a filing | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Duane Morris | Feb 2021 | Named in a filing | 413 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 1.06 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Dec 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Goodwin Procter | Nov 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Ropes & Gray | Nov 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Charles Wilson | Nov 2017 | Text search only | 25 | 0.72 | 0.81 | 0.92 |
| Goulston & Storrs | Nov 2017 | Text search only | 86 | 0.90 | 0.34 | 1.33 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Nov 2017 | Text search only | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sean FellerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in a filing · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Ryan A. MurrGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Andrew H. GoodmanGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.31×
- Caitlin L. MurrayGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Danielle LauzonGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Patrick O BrienRopes & GrayFirst linked Nov 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- William C. HicksMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked May 2022 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Dean M. ColucciDuane MorrisFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Kingsley L. TaftGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2017 · Text search only · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sean FellerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Mar 2021 | Named in a filing | 43 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| Ryan A. MurrGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 77 | 0.53 | 0.77 | 0.66 |
| Andrew H. GoodmanGoodwin Procter | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 0.31 |
| Caitlin L. MurrayGoodwin Procter | Nov 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.40 |
| Danielle LauzonGoodwin Procter | Nov 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.13 |
| Patrick O BrienRopes & Gray | Nov 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 45 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| William C. HicksMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | May 2022 | Text search only | 33 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Dean M. ColucciDuane Morris | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 49 | 0.36 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Kingsley L. TaftGoodwin Procter | Nov 2017 | Text search only | 43 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 1.47 |