Evofem Biosciences, Inc. EVFM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1618835Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Oct 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 100%
- Jan 2018 to Sep 2024
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLPFirst linked Jul 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 3.08× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Nov 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Nov 2017 · Text search only · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP | Jul 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 42 | 1.68 | 3.08 | 1.25 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Nov 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| DLA Piper | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| K&L Gates | Nov 2017 | Text search only | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Reed Smith | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dennis J. DoucetteProcopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLPFirst linked Jul 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.91× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
- Leanne A. GouldGunderson DettmerFirst linked May 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Adam C. LenainMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Nov 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Melanie Ruthrauff LevyMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Nov 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Patrick J. O MalleyDLA PiperFirst linked Nov 2017 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 4.16×
- Larry W. NishnickDLA PiperFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Michael S. KagnoffDLA PiperFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.81×
- Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2019 · Text search only · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Melanie RuthrauffMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Nov 2017 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Cheston J. LarsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.33× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Michael E. SullivanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Michael SandersReed SmithFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 2.06× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dennis J. DoucetteProcopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP | Jul 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.00 | 0.91 | 0.44 |
| Leanne A. GouldGunderson Dettmer | May 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.24 |
| Adam C. LenainMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Nov 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Melanie Ruthrauff LevyMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Nov 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.31 | 0.00 | 0.86 |
| Patrick J. O MalleyDLA Piper | Nov 2017 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 4.16 |
| Larry W. NishnickDLA Piper | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 4.03 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| Michael S. KagnoffDLA Piper | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.72 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
| Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLP | Nov 2019 | Text search only | 184 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Melanie RuthrauffMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Nov 2017 | Text search only | 9 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Cheston J. LarsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 46 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 1.55 |
| Michael E. SullivanLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 43 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 0.79 |
| Michael SandersReed Smith | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 15 | 1.13 | 2.06 | 1.80 |