Peak Resorts Inc SKIS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1517401Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Sep 2019 · Named in a filing · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Armstrong TeasdaleFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- Stinson Leonard Street LLPFirst linked Nov 2014 · Text search only · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.96× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Oct 2014 · Text search only · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Gibbons P.C.First linked Nov 2011 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 3.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Pierce AtwoodFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.23×
- Stinson Morrison HeckerFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Ulmer & BerneFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perkins Coie | Sep 2019 | Named in a filing | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
| Armstrong Teasdale | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 64 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.51 |
| Stinson Leonard Street LLP | Nov 2014 | Text search only | 46 | 0.91 | 0.96 | 0.94 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Oct 2014 | Text search only | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Gibbons P.C. | Nov 2011 | Text search only | 10 | 0.73 | 3.27 | 0.99 |
| Pierce Atwood | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 32 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 0.23 |
| Stinson Morrison Hecker | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 93 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Ulmer & Berne | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 34 | 1.22 | 0.49 | 1.18 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jason DayPerkins CoieFirst linked Sep 2019 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- David J. ChampouxPierce AtwoodFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jason DayPerkins Coie | Sep 2019 | Named in a filing | 29 | 0.53 | 0.98 | 1.00 |
| David J. ChampouxPierce Atwood | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 11 | 2.36 | 0.00 | 0.00 |