Integrated Drilling Equipment Holdings Corp IRIG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1514418Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jones DayFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 685 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 964 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and PopeoFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 769 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jones Day | Oct 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 685 | 1.25 | 0.55 | 1.11 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Mar 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 964 | 0.95 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo | Mar 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.18 |
| Paul Hastings | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 769 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Boris DolgonosWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.93×
- Jeffrey P. SchultzMintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and PopeoFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.11× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.58×
- Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in a filing · 339 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in a filing · 417 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boris DolgonosWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 1.93 |
| Jeffrey P. SchultzMintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 46 | 2.11 | 0.66 | 1.58 |
| Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Mar 2011 | Named in a filing | 339 | 0.95 | 0.66 | 0.96 |
| Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Mar 2011 | Named in a filing | 417 | 0.79 | 0.42 | 1.02 |