Nano Mobile Healthcare, Inc. VNTH (last ticker on record)
CIK 1497130Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jun 2014 to Sep 2016
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Shulman Rogers, P.A.First linked Jul 2014 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.71× · Went dark 1.26× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Nov 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Cane Clark LLPFirst linked Aug 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shulman Rogers, P.A. | Jul 2014 | Named in a filing | 25 | 2.71 | 1.26 | 1.16 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Nov 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Cane Clark LLP | Aug 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 143 | 1.25 | 1.17 | 0.97 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Scott D. MuselesShulman Rogers, P.A.First linked Jul 2014 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.72×
- Scott DoneyThe Doney Law FirmFirst linked Aug 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Daniel I. DeWolfMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Dec 2014 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 2.62×
- Bryan R. ClarkCane Clark LLPFirst linked Aug 2010 · Text search only · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott D. MuselesShulman Rogers, P.A. | Jul 2014 | Named in a filing | 11 | 2.45 | 0.00 | 1.72 |
| Scott DoneyThe Doney Law Firm | Aug 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 121 | 1.04 | 1.39 | 0.86 |
| Daniel I. DeWolfMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Dec 2014 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 1.66 | 2.62 |
| Bryan R. ClarkCane Clark LLP | Aug 2010 | Text search only | 77 | 0.95 | 0.85 | 1.22 |