T2 Biosystems, Inc. TTOO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1492674Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Feb 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Oct 2023 to Aug 2025
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLPFirst linked Jul 2024 · Text search only · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Jul 2014 · Text search only · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Goulston & StorrsFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP | Jul 2024 | Text search only | 154 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Jul 2014 | Text search only | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Goodwin Procter | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Goulston & Storrs | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 86 | 0.90 | 0.34 | 1.33 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steven B. StokdykLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- N. Danny ShulmanHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked Sep 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Evan SmithLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Brian D. PaulsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Johan V. BrighamLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.88×
- Peter N. HandrinosLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLPFirst linked Mar 2021 · Text search only · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Haim ZaltzmanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 2014 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- Mark J. MacenkaGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.64×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven B. StokdykLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 62 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| N. Danny ShulmanHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | Sep 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 2.45 | 0.00 | 1.04 |
| Evan SmithLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| Brian D. PaulsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| Johan V. BrighamLatham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 1.85 | 0.00 | 1.88 |
| Peter N. HandrinosLatham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 85 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 1.34 |
| Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLP | Mar 2021 | Text search only | 184 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Haim ZaltzmanLatham & Watkins LLP | Jul 2014 | Text search only | 27 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 1.61 |
| Mark J. MacenkaGoodwin Procter | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 12 | 0.87 | 0.00 | 2.64 |