Neptune Wellness Solutions Inc. NEPTF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1401395Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Sep 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jul 2019 to Feb 2024
- Law firms
- 15
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLPFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Fasken MartineauFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in a filing · 126 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLPFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 155 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Sep 2023 · Text search only · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Akerman LLPFirst linked Jan 2023 · Text search only · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Morrison Cohen LLPFirst linked Jan 2023 · Text search only · 74 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.77× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Jan 2023 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Nov 2022 · Text search only · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Jenner & BlockFirst linked Nov 2022 · Text search only · 122 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Nov 2022 · Text search only · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Nov 2022 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Barnes & ThornburgFirst linked Jan 2022 · Text search only · 167 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Jan 2022 · Text search only · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP | Jan 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 154 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Fasken Martineau | Mar 2021 | Named in a filing | 126 | 1.03 | 0.37 | 0.87 |
| Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Jul 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 155 | 1.19 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Feb 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| K&L Gates | Sep 2023 | Text search only | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Akerman LLP | Jan 2023 | Text search only | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.36 |
| Morrison Cohen LLP | Jan 2023 | Text search only | 74 | 1.77 | 0.85 | 1.15 |
| Proskauer Rose | Jan 2023 | Text search only | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Nov 2022 | Text search only | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Jenner & Block | Nov 2022 | Text search only | 122 | 1.12 | 0.78 | 0.94 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Nov 2022 | Text search only | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Sidley Austin | Nov 2022 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Barnes & Thornburg | Jan 2022 | Text search only | 167 | 1.07 | 0.70 | 0.86 |
| Pepper Hamilton | Jan 2022 | Text search only | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Thomas A. RoseSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 1.67× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Thomas M. RoseTroutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Christian G. KurtzPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Christopher J. CummingsPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Daniel J. WeberShearman & SterlingFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Daniel A. BagliebterMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked May 2023 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Ivan K. BlumenthalMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked May 2023 · Text search only · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas A. RoseSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 107 | 1.52 | 1.67 | 1.31 |
| Thomas M. RoseTroutman Sanders LLP | Jan 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 0.40 | 1.18 | 0.88 |
| Christian G. KurtzPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Feb 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Christopher J. CummingsPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Feb 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 60 | 1.20 | 0.38 | 0.74 |
| Daniel J. WeberShearman & Sterling | Feb 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.95 |
| Daniel A. BagliebterMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | May 2023 | Text search only | 25 | 2.69 | 0.00 | 1.49 |
| Ivan K. BlumenthalMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | May 2023 | Text search only | 29 | 1.31 | 0.00 | 1.61 |