RAINDANCE TECHNOLOGIES INC
CIK 1391950Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked May 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Aug 2014 · Text search only · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Jun 2014 · Text search only · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked May 2014 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked May 2014 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | May 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Aug 2014 | Text search only | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Jun 2014 | Text search only | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| HALE AND DORR | May 2014 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | May 2014 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joseph C. Theis Jr.Goodwin ProcterFirst linked May 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Mitchell S. BloomGoodwin ProcterFirst linked May 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 109 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Mitch BloomGoodwin ProcterFirst linked May 2014 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph C. Theis Jr.Goodwin Procter | May 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Mitchell S. BloomGoodwin Procter | May 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 109 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Mitch BloomGoodwin Procter | May 2014 | Text search only | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.03 |