Larimar Therapeutics, Inc. LRMR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1374690Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Sep 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Mar 2015 to Sep 2019
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Nov 2022 · Named in a filing · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLPFirst linked Jul 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Jun 2020 · Named in a filing · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Dechert LLPFirst linked Aug 2020 · Text search only · 434 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- McCarter & EnglishFirst linked Mar 2020 · Text search only · 141 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Goulston & StorrsFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Nov 2022 | Named in a filing | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP | Jul 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 154 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Pepper Hamilton | Jun 2020 | Named in a filing | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Dechert LLP | Aug 2020 | Text search only | 434 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
| McCarter & English | Mar 2020 | Text search only | 141 | 1.18 | 0.69 | 0.78 |
| Goulston & Storrs | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 86 | 0.90 | 0.34 | 1.33 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jennifer L. PorterGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Rachael M. BusheyGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Andrew H. GoodmanGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.31×
- Danielle LauzonGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Laurie A. BurlingameGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Michael J. MinahanGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.91× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Mitchell S. BloomGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 109 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- William C. HicksMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Nov 2022 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jennifer L. PorterGoodwin Procter | Jun 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Rachael M. BusheyGoodwin Procter | Jun 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| Andrew H. GoodmanGoodwin Procter | Apr 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 0.31 |
| Danielle LauzonGoodwin Procter | Nov 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.13 |
| Laurie A. BurlingameGoodwin Procter | Mar 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 1.07 |
| Michael J. MinahanGoodwin Procter | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.61 | 0.91 | 1.80 |
| Mitchell S. BloomGoodwin Procter | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 109 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| William C. HicksMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Nov 2022 | Text search only | 33 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.94 |