Casa Systems Inc CASA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1333835Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Apr 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Apr 2018 to Apr 2024
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Dec 2016 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Dec 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Dec 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Aug 2023 · Text search only · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2018 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Arthur CoxFirst linked Dec 2017 · Text search only · 92 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Jan 2017 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Dec 2016 · Text search only · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Choate Hall & StewartFirst linked Dec 2016 · Text search only · 142 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| HALE AND DORR | Dec 2016 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Dec 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Dec 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Aug 2023 | Text search only | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Apr 2018 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Arthur Cox | Dec 2017 | Text search only | 92 | 0.68 | 0.43 | 0.91 |
| Sidley Austin | Jan 2017 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | Dec 2016 | Text search only | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
| Choate Hall & Stewart | Dec 2016 | Text search only | 142 | 0.60 | 0.75 | 1.29 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John M. MutkoskiGoodwin ProcterFirst linked May 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Mark BassWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Nov 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- David A. WestenbergWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Dec 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Mark R. FitzgeraldWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Dec 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.64×
- Michael C. LabriolaWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Dec 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.01×
- Michael D. MalineGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2023 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Ana SemperteguiKirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2018 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John M. MutkoskiGoodwin Procter | May 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| Mark BassWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Nov 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.41 |
| David A. WestenbergWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Dec 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| Mark R. FitzgeraldWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Dec 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 2.64 |
| Michael C. LabriolaWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Dec 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 2.01 |
| Michael D. MalineGoodwin Procter | Aug 2023 | Text search only | 45 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 1.36 |
| Ana SemperteguiKirkland & Ellis | Apr 2018 | Text search only | 13 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.81 |