PLATINUM ENERGY RESOURCES INC PGRI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1329605Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Dec 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Porter & HedgesFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Boyer & KetchandFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.87×
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Sills Cummis & GrossFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Littman KrooksFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 2.07×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Mar 2006 · Text search only · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porter & Hedges | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 108 | 1.13 | 0.36 | 1.44 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Boyer & Ketchand | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 1.87 |
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| Sills Cummis & Gross | Mar 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 44 | 1.02 | 0.82 | 0.93 |
| Littman Krooks | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 0.88 | 0.65 | 2.07 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Mar 2006 | Text search only | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bryan K. BrownPorter & HedgesFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Kenneth R. KochMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Oct 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.86×
- Michele F. VaillantMcCarter & EnglishFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- Phillip A. WylieFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.33× · Went dark 1.27× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Jeffrey P. SchultzMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Sep 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.10× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Steven D. UslanerLittman KrooksFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.36×
- Mitchell C. LittmanLittman KrooksFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 1.43× · 95% wipeout 2.47×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bryan K. BrownPorter & Hedges | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 2.34 | 0.00 | 1.38 |
| Kenneth R. KochMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Oct 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 63 | 1.72 | 0.67 | 1.86 |
| Michele F. VaillantMcCarter & English | Nov 2006 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 0.68 |
| Phillip A. Wylie | Mar 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 4.33 | 1.27 | 0.76 |
| Jeffrey P. SchultzMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Sep 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 46 | 2.10 | 0.66 | 1.53 |
| Steven D. UslanerLittman Krooks | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 2.36 |
| Mitchell C. LittmanLittman Krooks | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 14 | 0.64 | 1.43 | 2.47 |