AVEO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AVEO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1325879Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Mar 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Jul 2011 to Mar 2020
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2020 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- LeClairRyan A Professional CorporationFirst linked May 2015 · Text search only · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2010 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Bingham McCutchenFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 291 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HALE AND DORR | Dec 2009 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Cooley LLP | Nov 2020 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| LeClairRyan A Professional Corporation | May 2015 | Text search only | 93 | 0.77 | 0.42 | 1.10 |
| Goodwin Procter | Feb 2010 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Ballard Spahr | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Bingham McCutchen | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 291 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 1.06 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cynthia T. MazareasWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Patrick O BrienRopes & GrayFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Steven D. SingerWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Julio E. VegaBingham McCutchenFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 2.41× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- William S. PerkinsMorgan LewisFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cynthia T. MazareasWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.49 | 0.00 | 1.13 |
| Patrick O BrienRopes & Gray | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 45 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Steven D. SingerWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 42 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 1.27 |
| Julio E. VegaBingham McCutchen | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 22 | 0.78 | 2.41 | 0.76 |
| William S. PerkinsMorgan Lewis | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 7 | 2.70 | 0.00 | 1.47 |