NewLead Holdings Ltd.
CIK 1322587Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fried FrankFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in a filing · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Sep 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Seward & KisselFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 164 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Norton RoseFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fried Frank | Dec 2010 | Named in a filing | 540 | 1.32 | 0.24 | 0.86 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Sep 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.18 |
| Seward & Kissel | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 164 | 0.78 | 0.19 | 1.31 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 0.98 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.14 |
| Norton Rose | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 305 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kenneth R. KochMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Mar 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.83×
- Todd E. MasonThompson Hine LLPFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Gary J. WolfeSeward & KisselFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.67×
- Robert E. LustrinSeward & KisselFirst linked May 2005 · Named in a filing · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 2.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth R. KochMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Mar 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 63 | 1.72 | 0.67 | 1.83 |
| Todd E. MasonThompson Hine LLP | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Gary J. WolfeSeward & Kissel | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 47 | 1.08 | 0.00 | 2.67 |
| Robert E. LustrinSeward & Kissel | May 2005 | Named in a filing | 40 | 1.29 | 0.55 | 2.91 |