Statera Biopharma, Inc. STAB (last ticker on record)
CIK 1318641Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Apr 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Sep 2007 to Nov 2019
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Jan 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Feb 2015 · Named in a filing · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in a filing · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 268 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Feb 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Apr 2015 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Feldman WeinsteinFirst linked Aug 2009 · Text search only · 278 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Aug 2007 · Text search only · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Troutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Jul 2006 · Text search only · 335 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Squire Sanders (US)First linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McGuireWoods LLP | Jan 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.11 |
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Feb 2015 | Named in a filing | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
| Cooley LLP | Dec 2013 | Named in a filing | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Feb 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 268 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 1.22 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Feb 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Pepper Hamilton | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Apr 2015 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Feldman Weinstein | Aug 2009 | Text search only | 278 | 0.92 | 1.17 | 1.20 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Aug 2007 | Text search only | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| Troutman Sanders LLP | Jul 2006 | Text search only | 335 | 1.15 | 0.61 | 1.16 |
| Squire Sanders (US) | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 199 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 1.13 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David S. WolpaMcGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- CECIL E. MARTIN IIIMcGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Jan 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Gregory SichenziaSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Feb 2015 · Named in a filing · 267 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.46× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Jeff CahlonSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Feb 2015 · Named in a filing · 65 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Marc RechtCooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in a filing · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.23× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Jeffrey P. SchultzMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Oct 2010 · Named in a filing · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.10× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Kenneth R. KochMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Oct 2010 · Named in a filing · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.86×
- Robert J. WildMayer BrownFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Henry I. RothmanTroutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Jul 2006 · Text search only · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.27× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Daniel G. BerickSquire Sanders (US)First linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David S. WolpaMcGuireWoods LLP | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.31 | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| CECIL E. MARTIN IIIMcGuireWoods LLP | Jan 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Gregory SichenziaSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Feb 2015 | Named in a filing | 267 | 1.06 | 1.46 | 1.24 |
| Jeff CahlonSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Feb 2015 | Named in a filing | 65 | 1.30 | 1.41 | 1.24 |
| Marc RechtCooley LLP | Dec 2013 | Named in a filing | 52 | 0.23 | 0.67 | 1.03 |
| Jeffrey P. SchultzMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Oct 2010 | Named in a filing | 46 | 2.10 | 0.66 | 1.53 |
| Kenneth R. KochMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Oct 2010 | Named in a filing | 63 | 1.72 | 0.67 | 1.86 |
| Robert J. WildMayer Brown | Jun 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| Henry I. RothmanTroutman Sanders LLP | Jul 2006 | Text search only | 30 | 0.27 | 0.38 | 1.11 |
| Daniel G. BerickSquire Sanders (US) | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.50 |