JAMBA, INC. JMBA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1316898Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Nov 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Nov 2006 to Mar 2009
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Sep 2018 · Named in a filing · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Feb 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Littman KrooksFirst linked Feb 2005 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 2.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Sep 2018 | Named in a filing | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| DLA Piper | Dec 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Feb 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Ropes & Gray | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Littman Krooks | Feb 2005 | Text search only | 32 | 0.88 | 0.65 | 2.07 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jeffrey D. MarellPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Sep 2018 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- CAMERON JAY RAINSDLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Eric WangDLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.85× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- John G. SaiaDLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2006 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.68×
- Martin P. DunnO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Kenneth R. KochMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Aug 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.86×
- Jay RainsDLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2006 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
- Ivan K. BlumenthalMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- Todd E. MasonThompson Hine LLPFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Mitchell C. LittmanLittman KrooksFirst linked Feb 2005 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 1.43× · 95% wipeout 2.47×
- Steven D. UslanerLittman KrooksFirst linked Feb 2005 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.36×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey D. MarellPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Sep 2018 | Named in a filing | 54 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| CAMERON JAY RAINSDLA Piper | Dec 2006 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.66 |
| Eric WangDLA Piper | Dec 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.85 | 1.28 | 0.95 |
| John G. SaiaDLA Piper | Dec 2006 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 1.68 |
| Martin P. DunnO Melveny & Myers LLP | Oct 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| Kenneth R. KochMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Aug 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 63 | 1.72 | 0.67 | 1.86 |
| Jay RainsDLA Piper | Dec 2006 | Text search only | 5 | 2.05 | 0.00 | 1.65 |
| Ivan K. BlumenthalMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 29 | 1.31 | 0.00 | 1.61 |
| Todd E. MasonThompson Hine LLP | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 29 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| Mitchell C. LittmanLittman Krooks | Feb 2005 | Text search only | 14 | 0.64 | 1.43 | 2.47 |
| Steven D. UslanerLittman Krooks | Feb 2005 | Text search only | 15 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 2.36 |