LIQTECH INTERNATIONAL INC LIQT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1307579Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Apr 2013 to Aug 2026
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked Sep 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Burton, Bartlett & GlogovacFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 1.58× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Dec 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Dec 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked May 2026 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Morse, Zelnick, Rose & Lander, LLPFirst linked Oct 2011 · Text search only · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Cletha A. WalstrandFirst linked Aug 2009 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.60×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Snell & Wilmer | Sep 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 244 | 1.34 | 1.19 | 1.38 |
| Burton, Bartlett & Glogovac | Jan 2014 | Named in a filing | 23 | 0.35 | 1.58 | 1.02 |
| K&L Gates | Apr 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Dec 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Richardson & Patel LLP | Dec 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.28 |
| Willkie Farr | May 2026 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Morse, Zelnick, Rose & Lander, LLP | Oct 2011 | Text search only | 56 | 0.85 | 0.52 | 1.80 |
| Cletha A. Walstrand | Aug 2009 | Text search only | 36 | 0.93 | 0.59 | 1.60 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John C. Scarborough Jr.K&L GatesFirst linked Sep 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.83×
- Matthew OgurickK&L GatesFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Clayton E. ParkerK&L GatesFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Jeffrey P. SchultzMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Dec 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.10× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Kenneth R. KochMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Dec 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.86×
- George LanderMorse, Zelnick, Rose & Lander, LLPFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Erin FogartyK&L GatesFirst linked May 2026 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.17×
- Michael BrandtWillkie FarrFirst linked May 2026 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John C. Scarborough Jr.K&L Gates | Sep 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 2.18 | 0.00 | 1.83 |
| Matthew OgurickK&L Gates | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 50 | 0.63 | 1.33 | 1.25 |
| Clayton E. ParkerK&L Gates | Apr 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 129 | 1.18 | 1.96 | 1.28 |
| Jeffrey P. SchultzMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Dec 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 46 | 2.10 | 0.66 | 1.53 |
| Kenneth R. KochMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Dec 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 63 | 1.72 | 0.67 | 1.86 |
| George LanderMorse, Zelnick, Rose & Lander, LLP | Oct 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.91 |
| Erin FogartyK&L Gates | May 2026 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.17 |
| Michael BrandtWillkie Farr | May 2026 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |