Eiger BioPharmaceuticals, Inc. EIGR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1305253Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Apr 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jun 2016 to Apr 2024
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Shaw PittmanFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in a filing · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in a filing · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Kilpatrick TownsendFirst linked Dec 2019 · Text search only · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2016 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Dec 2015 · Text search only · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jul 2014 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Jul 2014 · Text search only · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Oct 2013 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Jones DayFirst linked Oct 2013 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Sep 2013 · Text search only · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Dec 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Shaw Pittman | Dec 2015 | Named in a filing | 149 | 0.98 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| Sidley Austin | Jul 2014 | Named in a filing | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Cooley LLP | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Kilpatrick Townsend | Dec 2019 | Text search only | 154 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jun 2016 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Dec 2015 | Text search only | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Davis Polk | Jul 2014 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Perkins Coie | Jul 2014 | Text search only | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| DLA Piper | Oct 2013 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Jones Day | Oct 2013 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Sep 2013 | Text search only | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Carlton FlemingCooley LLPFirst linked Mar 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Peter N. MandelCooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.29×
- Glen Y. SatoCooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.66×
- Michael E. TentaCooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Mike HirdPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.82×
- Kristin VanderPasCooley LLPFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Jason L. KentCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Michael E. SullivanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Michael D. MalineGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2016 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Lee WhitleyFirst linked Jan 2016 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Cheston J. LarsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2013 · Text search only · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.33× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlton FlemingCooley LLP | Mar 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| Peter N. MandelCooley LLP | Jul 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 2.29 |
| Glen Y. SatoCooley LLP | Dec 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 1.50 | 0.00 | 1.66 |
| Michael E. TentaCooley LLP | Dec 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| Mike HirdPillsbury Winthrop | Dec 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.82 |
| Kristin VanderPasCooley LLP | Oct 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 61 | 0.47 | 0.00 | 1.49 |
| Jason L. KentCooley LLP | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Michael E. SullivanLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 0.79 |
| Michael D. MalineGoodwin Procter | Jun 2016 | Text search only | 45 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 1.36 |
| Lee Whitley | Jan 2016 | Text search only | 6 | 3.05 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Cheston J. LarsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2013 | Text search only | 46 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 1.55 |