NeuroMetrix, Inc. NURO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1289850Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Jun 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jan 2008 to Aug 2024
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Jul 2023 · Named in a filing · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Jan 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Jan 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Mar 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- H. DAVID HENKENFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.25×
- Blank RomeFirst linked Oct 2021 · Text search only · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covington & Burling | Jul 2023 | Named in a filing | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| McGuireWoods LLP | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.11 |
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | Jan 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Jan 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Mar 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 159 | 0.92 | 0.69 | 0.88 |
| Goodwin Procter | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| H. DAVID HENKEN | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 10 | 3.18 | 0.00 | 3.25 |
| Blank Rome | Oct 2021 | Text search only | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stephen E. OlderMcGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.92× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.79×
- Garrett M. WinslowMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Jan 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Kyle GuseHeller EhrmanFirst linked Jan 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Jonathan L. KravetzMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Nov 2011 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Megan N. GatesMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Mar 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- William T. WhelanMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Mar 2010 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Phillip D. TorrenceHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Daniel P. AdamsGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2008 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- H. David HenkenGoodwin ProcterFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.29×
- Brad L. ShiffmanBlank RomeFirst linked Oct 2021 · Text search only · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- David S. WolpaMcGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Apr 2015 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen E. OlderMcGuireWoods LLP | Mar 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 2.92 | 0.66 | 1.79 |
| Garrett M. WinslowMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Jan 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| Kyle GuseHeller Ehrman | Jan 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Jonathan L. KravetzMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Nov 2011 | Named in a filing | 35 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 1.19 |
| Megan N. GatesMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Mar 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 1.46 |
| William T. WhelanMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Mar 2010 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| Phillip D. TorrenceHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 1.95 | 0.00 | 0.69 |
| Daniel P. AdamsGoodwin Procter | Apr 2008 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| H. David HenkenGoodwin Procter | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 2.29 |
| Brad L. ShiffmanBlank Rome | Oct 2021 | Text search only | 47 | 1.33 | 0.74 | 1.61 |
| David S. WolpaMcGuireWoods LLP | Apr 2015 | Text search only | 14 | 1.31 | 0.00 | 1.12 |