INTERCEPT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. ICPT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1270073Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jun 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Mar 2014 to May 2023
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 14
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 2023 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in a filing · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jan 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Jul 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Sep 2012 · Text search only · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Clifford Chance US LLPFirst linked Sep 2012 · Text search only · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Fried FrankFirst linked Sep 2012 · Text search only · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Nov 2023 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| DLA Piper | Mar 2023 | Named in a filing | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jan 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| HALE AND DORR | Apr 2014 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Goodwin Procter | Sep 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Jul 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Sep 2012 | Text search only | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| Clifford Chance US LLP | Sep 2012 | Text search only | 260 | 0.92 | 0.41 | 0.85 |
| Fried Frank | Sep 2012 | Text search only | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Matthew G. HurdSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 2023 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Laura KnollSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Oct 2023 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Andrew P. GilbertDLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in a filing · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.50× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Emilio RagosaMorgan LewisFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Graham RobinsonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jul 2018 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Brian A. JohnsonWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- David E. RedlickWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in a filing · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Jason L. KroppWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in a filing · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Bryan PitkoMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.95×
- William T. WhelanMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Sep 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Scott A. SamuelsMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Jul 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Brian V. BrehenySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jan 2018 · Text search only · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
- Brian HoffmannClifford Chance US LLPFirst linked Sep 2012 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.47×
- Christopher J. AustinOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Sep 2012 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.54×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew G. HurdSullivan & Cromwell | Nov 2023 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Laura KnollSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Oct 2023 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Andrew P. GilbertDLA Piper | Mar 2023 | Named in a filing | 49 | 0.65 | 0.50 | 1.01 |
| Emilio RagosaMorgan Lewis | Mar 2023 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| Graham RobinsonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jul 2018 | Named in a filing | 42 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.69 |
| Brian A. JohnsonWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Apr 2014 | Named in a filing | 27 | 1.43 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| David E. RedlickWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Apr 2014 | Named in a filing | 51 | 1.24 | 0.33 | 1.01 |
| Jason L. KroppWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Apr 2014 | Named in a filing | 46 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 1.38 |
| Bryan PitkoMorrison & Foerster | Sep 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 1.95 |
| William T. WhelanMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Sep 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| Scott A. SamuelsMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Jul 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 1.35 |
| Brian V. BrehenySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jan 2018 | Text search only | 50 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 0.60 |
| Brian HoffmannClifford Chance US LLP | Sep 2012 | Text search only | 17 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 0.47 |
| Christopher J. AustinOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Sep 2012 | Text search only | 21 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 2.54 |