Sintx Technologies, Inc. SINT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1269026Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Oct 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Feb 2021 to Aug 2026
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Jul 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked May 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Polsinelli PCFirst linked Apr 2018 · Text search only · 82 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Apr 2018 · Text search only · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Holland & HartFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 240 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.92× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Patton BoggsFirst linked Sep 2013 · Text search only · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Stoel RivesFirst linked Sep 2013 · Text search only · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Davis PolkFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Jul 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
| Cooley LLP | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | May 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Polsinelli PC | Apr 2018 | Text search only | 82 | 1.22 | 0.81 | 1.36 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Apr 2018 | Text search only | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| Holland & Hart | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 240 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.86 |
| Patton Boggs | Sep 2013 | Text search only | 186 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 1.35 |
| Stoel Rives | Sep 2013 | Text search only | 208 | 0.84 | 0.67 | 1.20 |
| Sidley Austin | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Davis Polk | May 2007 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Winston & Strawn | May 2007 | Text search only | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dan LymanDorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Nov 2019 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Michael R. NewtonDorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Feb 2018 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 12.36× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- David F. MarxDorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Jul 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 3.19× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Brian P. KeaneMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Oct 2014 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Daniel T. KajunskiMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Jonathan L. KravetzMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked May 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Sarah WilliamsEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Apr 2018 · Text search only · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 1.90× · 95% wipeout 1.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dan LymanDorsey & Whitney LLP | Nov 2019 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| Michael R. NewtonDorsey & Whitney LLP | Feb 2018 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 12.36 | 1.21 |
| David F. MarxDorsey & Whitney LLP | Jul 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.41 | 3.19 | 1.16 |
| Brian P. KeaneMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Oct 2014 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.32 |
| Daniel T. KajunskiMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Jonathan L. KravetzMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | May 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 1.19 |
| Sarah WilliamsEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Apr 2018 | Text search only | 49 | 1.71 | 1.90 | 1.66 |