CONVERSE INC
CIK 1209807Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Arnold & PorterFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 254 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.41 |
| Arnold & Porter | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 254 | 1.03 | 0.11 | 0.81 |
| Davis Polk | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Goodwin Procter | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.16 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.18 |
| Willkie Farr | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.82 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jack HelfandWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.51× · Went dark 3.58× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Kurt J. BerneyO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
- Robert B. OttArnold & PorterFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jack HelfandWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 7 | 4.51 | 3.58 | 0.00 |
| Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 102 | 1.24 | 0.83 | 1.44 |
| Kurt J. BerneyO Melveny & Myers LLP | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.39 | 0.00 | 1.89 |
| Robert B. OttArnold & Porter | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.49 |