Rib-X Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
CIK 1164994Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and PopeoFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in a filing · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked May 2012 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked May 2012 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Nov 2011 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo | Nov 2011 | Named in a filing | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.18 |
| HALE AND DORR | May 2012 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | May 2012 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.23 |
| DLA Piper | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| Willkie Farr | Nov 2011 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.82 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Daniel H. FollansbeeMintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and PopeoFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- John T. RudyMintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and PopeoFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Jonathan L. KravetzMintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and PopeoFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Megan N. GatesMintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and PopeoFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in a filing · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Mark A. CognettiWillkie FarrFirst linked Nov 2011 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.99× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel H. FollansbeeMintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo | Nov 2011 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.51 |
| John T. RudyMintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo | Nov 2011 | Named in a filing | 33 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| Jonathan L. KravetzMintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo | Nov 2011 | Named in a filing | 35 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| Megan N. GatesMintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo | Nov 2011 | Named in a filing | 43 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 1.48 |
| Mark A. CognettiWillkie Farr | Nov 2011 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 1.99 | 0.99 |