YIELD10 BIOSCIENCE, INC. YTEN (last ticker on record)

CIK 1121702Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

95% wipeout
Delisting notice (not a red flag)
Restructuring
Bankruptcy

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 3; Newest began Dec 2024
Largest fall in its shares: 99%; Apr 2017 to Jan 2025
Law firms: 6; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 8; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Dec 6, 2024Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 15, 2024Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 29, 2024Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Feb 16, 2024Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 6, 2023Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Nov 17, 2023Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Sep 25, 2023Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 19, 2023Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 26, 2019Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Nov 14, 2019Shares down 95% from their high
Jul 1, 2019Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 17, 2017Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jan 3, 2017Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jul 26, 2016Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jul 7, 2016Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jan 5, 2015Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Oct 6, 2014Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jul 11, 2014Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jan 12, 2012Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jun 17, 2011Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Covington & Burling	Jul 2023	Named in SEC correspondence	447	1.07	0.27	0.99
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.	Aug 2006	Named in SEC correspondence	567	0.92	0.60	1.20
Goodwin Procter	Jul 2006	Named in SEC correspondence	1,221	0.79	0.31	1.17
Fish & Richardson	Nov 2006	Text search only	37	0.93	1.30	2.73
Piper Rudnick	Aug 2006	Text search only	183	1.09	0.37	0.82
Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP	Aug 2006	Text search only	150	1.08	0.42	1.31

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Joel I. PapernikMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.	Jun 2023	Named in SEC correspondence	14	0.61	2.47	1.34
Michael F. NertneyEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP	Nov 2017	Named in a filing	19	0.00	0.00	1.04
Megan N. GatesMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.	Mar 2017	Named in SEC correspondence	43	0.60	0.56	1.46
Thomas S. LevatoGoodwin Procter	Oct 2015	Named in SEC correspondence	28	1.00	0.00	2.32
Joseph C. Theis Jr.Goodwin Procter	Apr 2011	Named in SEC correspondence	31	1.01	0.00	1.01
Christopher J. DennGoodwin Procter	Jul 2006	Named in SEC correspondence	6	0.00	0.00	1.58
John M. MutkoskiGoodwin Procter	Jul 2006	Named in SEC correspondence	26	0.39	0.00	1.25
Robert E. PuopoloGoodwin Procter	Jul 2006	Named in SEC correspondence	35	0.00	0.00	0.88