GPC BIOTECH AG GPCBY (last ticker on record)
CIK 1117629Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Feb 2007 to Oct 2008
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Palmer & DodgeFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 98 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Covington & Burling | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Palmer & Dodge | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 98 | 0.89 | 0.75 | 0.99 |
| Ropes & Gray | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Danielle CarboneShearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 2.58×
- Jeffrey M. WiesenMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Marc A. RubensteinRopes & GrayFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danielle CarboneShearman & Sterling | Jun 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 0.82 | 0.98 | 2.58 |
| Jeffrey M. WiesenMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.27 |
| Marc A. RubensteinRopes & Gray | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 48 | 0.64 | 0.56 | 1.22 |