CHIMERIX INC CMRX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1117480Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Aug 2015 to Aug 2024
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Apr 2025 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2020 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Norton RoseFirst linked Oct 2013 · Text search only · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Mar 2013 · Text search only · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSONFirst linked Mar 2013 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Jan 2013 · Text search only · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Jan 2013 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Apr 2025 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Cooley LLP | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Davis Polk | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2020 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Norton Rose | Oct 2013 | Text search only | 304 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.24 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Mar 2013 | Text search only | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON | Mar 2013 | Text search only | 58 | 1.13 | 0.57 | 1.27 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Jan 2013 | Text search only | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Holland & Knight | Jan 2013 | Text search only | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mark GordonWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Apr 2025 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- Victor GoldfeldWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Apr 2025 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
- Graham RobinsonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Mar 2025 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Laura KnollSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Mar 2025 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Nathan J. NouskajianCooley LLPFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Jason L. KentCooley LLPFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Richard D. Truesdell Jr.Davis PolkFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark GordonWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Apr 2025 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| Victor GoldfeldWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Apr 2025 | Named in a filing | 29 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.44 |
| Graham RobinsonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Mar 2025 | Named in a filing | 42 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.69 |
| Laura KnollSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Mar 2025 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Nathan J. NouskajianCooley LLP | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.92 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Jason L. KentCooley LLP | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Richard D. Truesdell Jr.Davis Polk | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 149 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 1.06 |