MEDSOURCE TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, LLC MEDT (last ticker on record)

CIK 1084726Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

None

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 0; None on record
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 24; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 10; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Hogan Lovells US LLP	Jun 2010	Named in a filing	487	0.96	0.26	0.85
/ S / V ENABLE LLP	Jun 2010	Named in a filing	5	0.00	0.00	0.00
Snell & Wilmer	Jan 2006	Named in a filing	244	1.34	1.19	1.38
Venable LLP	Jan 2006	Named in a filing	506	0.79	0.38	0.73
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett	Dec 2005	Named in SEC correspondence	1,396	1.28	0.11	0.92
Lionel Sawyer & Collins	Aug 2004	Named in a filing	128	1.07	0.88	0.96
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.	Aug 2004	Named in a filing	567	0.92	0.60	1.20
Saul Ewing	Aug 2004	Named in a filing	100	1.22	1.01	1.14
Hogan & Hartson	May 2004	Named in SEC correspondence	390	1.03	0.30	1.18
Jenkens & Gilchrist	Jan 2002	Named in a filing	279	1.12	0.71	1.11
Kirkland & Ellis	Dec 2005	Text search only	1,686	0.98	0.17	0.87
Ballard Spahr	Aug 2004	Text search only	492	1.23	1.06	0.73
Shearman & Sterling	Aug 2004	Text search only	2,649	1.21	0.13	0.87
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Aug 2004	Text search only	2,607	1.15	0.19	0.85
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP	May 2004	Text search only	1,051	1.31	0.27	0.91
Miller & Martin	Mar 2002	Text search only	49	0.33	1.26	0.74
Robinson & Cole LLP	Mar 2002	Text search only	133	0.95	0.56	0.88
Choate Hall & Stewart	Jan 2002	Text search only	142	0.60	0.75	1.29
Faegre & Benson	Jan 2002	Text search only	160	0.90	0.59	1.08
Messerli & Kramer P.A.	Jan 2002	Text search only	24	0.64	1.65	1.40
Morrison Cohen LLP	Jan 2002	Text search only	74	1.77	0.85	1.15
Palmer & Dodge	Jan 2002	Text search only	98	0.89	0.75	0.99
Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison	Jan 2002	Text search only	826	1.02	0.18	0.83
White & Case	Jan 2002	Text search only	907	1.04	0.33	0.91

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Joseph KaufmanSimpson Thacher & Bartlett	Dec 2005	Named in SEC correspondence	45	0.82	0.00	0.46
Scott A. BerdanHolland & Hart	Aug 2004	Named in a filing	19	0.00	0.00	1.02
Christopher J. WalshHogan & Hartson	May 2004	Named in SEC correspondence	13	1.61	0.00	0.47
EDWARD R. MANDELLJenkens & Gilchrist	Jan 2002	Named in a filing	7	0.00	0.00	1.22
OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & Bartlett	Jun 2010	Text search only	160	1.27	0.15	0.90
Sean RodgersSimpson Thacher & Bartlett	Dec 2005	Text search only	17	0.33	0.00	0.00
Douglas WarnerWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP	Aug 2004	Text search only	18	1.00	0.00	1.61
Raymond D. AgranBallard Spahr	Aug 2004	Text search only	6	1.59	2.33	0.00
David B. MillerFaegre & Benson	Jan 2002	Text search only	9	0.96	0.00	0.00
MICHAEL LYTTONPalmer & Dodge	Jan 2002	Text search only	9	0.86	1.34	0.49