STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. SSKN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1051514Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jul 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Apr 2017 to Jul 2026
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stevens & LeeFirst linked Nov 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Duane MorrisFirst linked Jul 2015 · Named in a filing · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLPFirst linked May 2009 · Named in a filing · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 1.50× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stevens & Lee | Nov 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 127 | 1.08 | 0.74 | 0.59 |
| Duane Morris | Jul 2015 | Named in a filing | 413 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 1.06 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jun 2013 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP | May 2009 | Named in a filing | 55 | 0.59 | 1.50 | 1.41 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mark E. RosensteinLedgewood, PCFirst linked Nov 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Edward D. RicchiutoSidley AustinFirst linked Aug 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Kenneth R. KochMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Jul 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.86×
- John W. KauffmanDuane MorrisFirst linked Jul 2015 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.34× · 95% wipeout 2.15×
- Garrett M. WinslowMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Robert F. CharronEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 1.11× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Megan N. GatesMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Martin C. GlassJenner & BlockFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Stephen M. DavisGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- David C. PeckGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark E. RosensteinLedgewood, PC | Nov 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 38 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Edward D. RicchiutoSidley Austin | Aug 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Kenneth R. KochMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Jul 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 63 | 1.72 | 0.67 | 1.86 |
| John W. KauffmanDuane Morris | Jul 2015 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.00 | 2.34 | 2.15 |
| Garrett M. WinslowMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| Robert F. CharronEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 62 | 1.42 | 1.11 | 1.26 |
| Megan N. GatesMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 1.46 |
| Martin C. GlassJenner & Block | Jun 2013 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 1.52 |
| Stephen M. DavisGoodwin Procter | Jun 2013 | Named in a filing | 20 | 1.61 | 1.35 | 1.39 |
| David C. PeckGreenberg Traurig | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 1.16 |