CURAGEN CORP CRGN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1030653Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Dec 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Jan 2004 to Dec 2008
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lowenstein SandlerFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in a filing · 297 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in a filing · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Jul 2007 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Oct 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lowenstein Sandler | Nov 2009 | Named in a filing | 297 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.44 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Aug 2009 | Named in a filing | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.23 |
| HALE AND DORR | Jul 2007 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Oct 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.18 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Anthony O. PergolaLowenstein SandlerFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Ethan SkerryFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Philip P. RossettiHALE AND DORRFirst linked Jul 2007 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Michael L. FantozziMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Mar 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Jonathan L. KravetzMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthony O. PergolaLowenstein Sandler | Nov 2009 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| Ethan SkerryFenwick & West LLP | Nov 2009 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Philip P. RossettiHALE AND DORR | Jul 2007 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| Michael L. FantozziMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Mar 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| Jonathan L. KravetzMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 35 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 1.12 |