AIR INDUSTRIES GROUP AIRI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1009891Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Aug 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Aug 2007 to Aug 2026
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked May 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Mandelbaum SalsburgFirst linked Jun 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Eaton & Van Winkle LLPFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 375 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in a filing · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Dechert LLPFirst linked Oct 2026 · Text search only · 434 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Moore & Van AllenFirst linked Oct 2026 · Text search only · 131 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Graubard MillerFirst linked Dec 2024 · Text search only · 418 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Oct 2012 · Text search only · 567 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Wilentz Goldman & SpitzerFirst linked Oct 2012 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Goldstein & DiGioiaFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 1.31× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Phillips Nizer LLPFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.85× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | May 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Mandelbaum Salsburg | Jun 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.00 | 1.41 | 0.76 |
| Eaton & Van Winkle LLP | Feb 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 49 | 0.35 | 1.45 | 1.17 |
| ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 375 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 0.93 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Dec 2003 | Named in a filing | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Dechert LLP | Oct 2026 | Text search only | 434 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
| Moore & Van Allen | Oct 2026 | Text search only | 131 | 0.66 | 0.17 | 0.90 |
| Graubard Miller | Dec 2024 | Text search only | 418 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 1.16 |
| Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Oct 2012 | Text search only | 567 | 0.92 | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Wilentz Goldman & Spitzer | Oct 2012 | Text search only | 18 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.84 |
| Goldstein & DiGioia | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 19 | 1.62 | 1.31 | 1.47 |
| Phillips Nizer LLP | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 45 | 0.98 | 1.85 | 0.83 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jonathan J. RussoPillsbury WinthropFirst linked May 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 1.76× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Mark OrensteinEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 3.23× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Vincent J. McGillEaton & Van Winkle LLPFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.34× · Went dark 2.27× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Richard I. AnslowEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 153 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- William C. HicksMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.First linked Oct 2012 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Brian C. DaughneyBecker & Poliakoff LLPFirst linked Feb 2006 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 1.71× · 95% wipeout 1.58×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan J. RussoPillsbury Winthrop | May 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.26 | 1.76 | 1.18 |
| Mark OrensteinEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jun 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 3.23 | 0.00 |
| Vincent J. McGillEaton & Van Winkle LLP | Feb 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 0.34 | 2.27 | 1.56 |
| Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Jul 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 338 | 1.23 | 1.39 | 0.89 |
| Richard I. AnslowEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 153 | 1.23 | 1.12 | 0.95 |
| William C. HicksMintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. | Oct 2012 | Text search only | 33 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Brian C. DaughneyBecker & Poliakoff LLP | Feb 2006 | Text search only | 37 | 1.25 | 1.71 | 1.58 |