INNOVATE Corp. VATE (last ticker on record)

CIK 1006837Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Bankruptcy
Restructuring
Restatement
Delisting notice (not a red flag)

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 3; Newest began Feb 2016
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 16; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 15; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Feb 26, 2024Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Nov 2, 2022Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jun 29, 2022Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 10, 2017Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Feb 22, 2016Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Nov 8, 2013Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 3, 2012Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
Jul 3, 2012Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 5, 2010Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jun 15, 2009Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 29, 2009Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
Apr 29, 2009Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
Apr 23, 2009Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
Mar 16, 2009Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 16, 2009Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jul 28, 2006Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jun 16, 2006Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 14, 2006Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 14, 2005Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jun 17, 2005Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Oct 15, 2004Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Oct 15, 2004Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton	Aug 2026	Named in a filing	741	1.31	0.12	0.76
Woods Oviatt Gilman	Sep 2023	Named in SEC correspondence	20	1.57	1.71	0.90
Pillsbury Winthrop	May 2018	Named in a filing	516	1.13	0.82	1.27
Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy	Jun 2017	Named in a filing	439	1.03	0.35	0.76
Latham & Watkins LLP	Oct 2015	Named in SEC correspondence	2,667	0.98	0.31	1.10
Jenner & Block	Sep 2014	Named in a filing	122	1.12	0.78	0.94
Andrews Kurth LLP	Dec 2010	Named in a filing	398	1.27	0.35	1.30
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.	Dec 2010	Named in a filing	567	0.92	0.60	1.20
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Jul 2006	Named in SEC correspondence	2,607	1.15	0.19	0.85
HALE AND DORR	Mar 2006	Named in a filing	665	1.06	0.33	1.26
Cooley LLP	Oct 2001	Named in a filing	1,634	0.71	0.44	1.24
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett	Jun 2000	Named in a filing	1,396	1.28	0.11	0.92
Hogan & Hartson	Feb 1999	Named in SEC correspondence	390	1.03	0.30	1.18
Kelley Drye & Warren	May 1998	Named in a filing	152	1.24	0.53	1.21
Pepper Hamilton	Aug 1996	Named in SEC correspondence	340	1.03	0.35	1.13
Kleinberg Kaplan Wolff & Cohen	Mar 2020	Text search only	27	1.26	3.69	1.35

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Gregory W. GribbenWoods Oviatt Gilman	Sep 2023	Named in SEC correspondence	6	1.82	0.00	1.13
Gregory A. FernicolaSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Sep 2020	Named in SEC correspondence	67	1.07	0.40	0.85
Richard J. GrossmanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Mar 2020	Named in SEC correspondence	48	0.33	0.00	0.99
Todd E. FreedSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Mar 2020	Named in SEC correspondence	28	0.78	0.00	0.39
Thomas A. MonsonJenner & Block	Sep 2014	Named in a filing	12	1.76	0.00	1.57
Lance SchulerAndrews Kurth LLP	Dec 2010	Named in a filing	5	1.61	0.00	1.58
Casey T. FleckSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Jul 2009	Named in a filing	20	1.85	0.00	0.47
Thomas W. WhiteWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING	Mar 2006	Named in a filing	11	0.85	1.73	3.72
Brian J. LynchHogan & Hartson	May 2002	Named in SEC correspondence	14	1.10	0.00	0.99
Darren K. DeStefanoCooley LLP	May 2002	Named in a filing	43	0.00	0.00	1.32
Edward P. Tolley IIISimpson Thacher & Bartlett	Jun 2000	Named in a filing	58	0.93	0.00	0.53
JAMES D. EPSTEINPepper Hamilton	Aug 1996	Named in SEC correspondence	7	2.03	0.00	0.00
Adam FleisherCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton	Aug 2026	Text search only	24	1.46	0.00	0.72
Christopher P. DavisKleinberg Kaplan Wolff & Cohen	Mar 2020	Text search only	17	0.65	4.87	1.91
Peter C. KruppSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Jul 2006	Text search only	20	0.58	0.00	0.50