Core Natural Resources, Inc.

Previous wording

•volatility and wide fluctuation in coal prices based upon a number of factors beyond our control including future plans to eliminate coal-fired generation facilities, oversupply relative to the demand available for our products, weather and the price and availability of alternative fuels;

Current wording

•volatility and wide fluctuation in coal prices based upon a number of factors beyond our control including future plans to eliminate coal-fired electric power generation facilities, oversupply relative to the demand available for our products, weather and the price and availability of alternative fuels and technologies;

Previous wording

•exposure to employee-related long-term liabilities; and

Current wording

•exposure to employee-related long-term liabilities;

Previous wording

•demand for electricity in the United States is impacted by industrial production, which, if weakened, would negatively impact the revenues, margins and profitability of our coal business;

Current wording

•demand for electricity in the U.S. is impacted by industrial production, which, if weakened, would negatively impact the revenues, margins and profitability of our coal business;

Previous wording

•demand for metallurgical coal depends on coke and steel demand in the United States and globally, which, if weakened, would negatively impact the revenues, margins and profitability of our metallurgical coal business or our thermal coal as higher priced high volatile metallurgical coal;

Current wording

•demand for metallurgical coal depends on coke and steel demand in the U.S. and globally, which, if weakened, would negatively impact the revenues, margins and profitability of our metallurgical coal business or our thermal coal as higher priced high-volatile metallurgical coal;

Previous wording

Prices for coal are volatile and can fluctuate widely based upon a number of factors beyond our control including oversupply relative to the demand available for our coal, weather, the price and availability of alternative fuels and plans by electricity generators to shut down or move away from coal-fired generation. A substantial or extended decline in the prices we receive for our coal will adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Current wording

Prices for coal are volatile and can fluctuate widely based upon a number of factors beyond our control including oversupply relative to the demand available for our coal, weather, the price and availability of alternative fuels and technologies and plans by electric power generators to shut down or move away from coal-fired generation. A substantial or extended decline in the prices we receive for our coal will adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Previous wording

•changes in the consumption pattern of industrial consumers, electricity generators and residential end-users of electricity;

Current wording

•changes in the consumption pattern of industrial consumers, electric power generators and residential end-users of electricity;

Previous wording

•the price and availability of alternative fuels and sources for electricity generation, especially natural gas and renewable energy sources;

Current wording

•the price and availability of alternative fuels and sources for electric power generation, especially natural gas and renewable energy sources;

Previous wording

During the year ended December 31, 2024, approximately 43% of the coal the Company produced was sold under multi-year sales contracts. If a substantial portion of our multi-year sales contracts are modified or terminated, if force majeure is exercised, or if we are unable to replace or extend the contracts or new contracts are priced at lower levels, our profitability would be adversely affected. In addition, if customers refuse to accept shipments of our coal for which they have existing contractual obligations, our revenues will decrease and we may have to reduce production at our mines until such customers honor their contractual obligations and begin accepting shipments of our coal again.

Current wording

During the year ended December 31, 2025, approximately 69% of the coal the Company produced was sold under multi-year sales contracts. If a substantial portion of our multi-year sales contracts are modified or terminated, if force majeure clauses are exercised, or if we are unable to replace or extend the contracts or new contracts are priced at lower levels, our profitability would be adversely affected. In addition, if customers refuse to accept shipments of our coal for which they have existing contractual obligations, our revenues will decrease and we may have to reduce production at our mines until such customers honor their contractual obligations and begin accepting shipments of our coal again.

Previous wording

The profitability of our multi-year sales coal supply contracts depends on a variety of factors, which vary from contract to contract and fluctuate during the contract term, including our production costs and other factors. Price changes, if any, provided in long-term supply contracts may not reflect our cost increases, and therefore, increases in our costs may reduce our profit margins. In addition, during periods of declining market prices, provisions in our long-term coal contracts for adjustment or renegotiation of prices and other provisions may increase our exposure to short-term coal price and electric power price volatility. As a result, we may not be able to obtain long-term agreements at favorable prices compared to either market conditions, as they may change from time to time, or our cost structure, which may reduce our profitability.

Current wording

The profitability of our multi-year sales contracts to supply coal depends on a variety of factors, which vary from contract to contract and fluctuate during the contract term, including our production costs and other factors. Price changes, if any, provided in long-term supply contracts may not reflect our cost increases, and therefore, increases in our costs may reduce our profit margins. In addition, during periods of declining market prices, provisions in our long-term coal contracts for adjustment or renegotiation of prices and other provisions may increase our exposure to short-term coal price and electric power price volatility. As a result, we may not be able to obtain long-term agreements at favorable prices compared to either market conditions, as they may change from time to time, or our cost structure, which may reduce our profitability.

Previous wording

There are inherent risks whenever a significant percentage of total revenues are concentrated with a limited number of customers. Revenues from our largest customers may fluctuate from time to time based on numerous factors, including market conditions, which may be outside of our control. If any of our largest customers experience declining revenues due to market, economic or competitive conditions, we could be pressured to reduce the prices that we charge for our coal, which could have an adverse effect on our margins, profitability, cash flows and financial position. If any customers were to significantly reduce their purchases of coal from us, including by failing to buy and pay for coal they committed to purchase in sales contracts, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected.

Current wording

A significant portion of our coal is sold in the export market, and we remain somewhat exposed to risks associated with a concentrated customer base both domestically and globally. There are inherent risks whenever a significant percentage of total revenues is concentrated with a limited number of customers. Revenues from our largest customers may fluctuate from time to time based on numerous factors, including market conditions, which may be outside of our control. If any of our largest customers experience declining revenues due to market, economic or competitive conditions, we could be pressured to reduce the prices that we charge for our coal, which could have an adverse effect on our margins, profitability, cash flows and financial position. If any customers were to significantly reduce their purchases of coal from us, including by failing to buy and pay for coal they committed to purchase in sales contracts, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected.

Previous wording

Our ability to collect payments from our customers for coal sold and delivered could be impaired if their creditworthiness declines or if they fail to honor their contracts. Because a significant portion of our sales are concentrated to a few material customers, if the creditworthiness of a significant customer declines or the customer significantly delays payments to us, our business, cash flows and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected. If we determine that a customer is not creditworthy, we may be able to withhold delivery under the customer's coal sales contract. However, if this occurs, we may decide to sell the customer's coal on the spot market, which may be at prices lower than the contracted price, or we may be unable to sell the coal at all. Furthermore, if customers refuse to accept shipments of our coal for which they have an existing contractual obligation or if we terminate a relationship with a significant customer due to credit risks, our revenue could decrease materially and we may have to reduce production at our mines until our customers’ contractual obligations are honored or we are able to replace a significant customer. In addition, our borrowing capacity under our receivables financing arrangement could be reduced if we experience prolonged and significant delays in payments by one or more material customers.

Current wording

Our ability to collect payments from our customers for coal sold and delivered could be impaired if their creditworthiness declines or if they fail to honor their contracts. If the creditworthiness of a significant customer declines or the customer significantly delays payments to us, our business, cash flows and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected. If we determine that a customer is not creditworthy, we may be able to withhold delivery under the customer’s coal sales contract. However, if this occurs, we may decide to sell the customer’s coal on the spot market, which may be at prices lower than the contracted price, or we may be unable to sell the coal at all. Furthermore, if customers refuse to accept shipments of our coal for which they have an existing contractual obligation or if we terminate a relationship with a significant customer due to credit risks, our revenue could decrease materially and we may have to reduce production at our mines until our customers’ contractual obligations are honored or we are able to replace a significant customer. In addition, our borrowing capacity under our receivables financing arrangement could be reduced if we experience prolonged and significant delays in payments by one or more material customers.

Previous wording

Also, our customer base may change with deregulation as domestic utilities sell their power plants to their non-regulated affiliates or third parties that may be less creditworthy, thereby increasing the risk we bear for customer payment default. Some power plant owners may have credit ratings that are below investment grade or may become below investment grade after we enter into contracts with them. Furthermore, our metallurgical customers operate in a highly competitive and cyclical industry where their creditworthiness could deteriorate rapidly.

Current wording

Also, our customer base may change if domestic utilities sell their power plants to their non-regulated affiliates or third parties that may be less creditworthy, thereby increasing the risk we bear for customer payment default. Some power plant owners may have credit ratings that are below investment grade or may become below investment grade after we enter into contracts with them. Furthermore, our metallurgical customers operate in a highly competitive and cyclical industry where their creditworthiness could deteriorate rapidly.

Previous wording

Decreases in coal consumption patterns for steel production, electricity generation and industrial applications could adversely affect our business.

Current wording

Decreases in coal consumption patterns for steel production, electric power generation and industrial applications could adversely affect our business.

Previous wording

Our business is closely linked to demand for electricity, and any changes in coal consumption by U.S. or international electric power generators would likely impact our business over the long term. According to the EIA, in 2024, the domestic electric power sector accounted for approximately 91% of total U.S. coal consumption. In 2024, the Pennsylvania Mining Complex sold approximately 41% of its coal to U.S. electric power generators, and we have annual or multi-year contracts in place with many of these electric power generators for a significant portion of our future production. The amount of coal consumed by the electric power generation industry is affected by, among other things:

Current wording

Our business is closely linked to demand for electricity, and any changes in coal consumption by U.S. or international electric power generators would likely impact our business over the long term. According to the EIA, in 2025, the domestic electric power sector accounted for approximately 92% of total U.S. coal consumption. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company sold approximately 68% of its sales tons to U.S. electric power generators, and we have annual or multi-year contracts in place with many of these electric power generators for a significant portion of our future production. The amount of coal consumed by the electric power generation industry is affected by, among other things:

Previous wording

•indirect competition from alternative fuel sources for power generation, such as natural gas, fuel oil, nuclear, hydroelectric, wind and solar power, and the location, availability, quality and price of those alternative fuel sources;

Current wording

•indirect competition from alternative fuel sources for electric power generation, such as natural gas, fuel oil, nuclear, hydroelectric, wind and solar power, and the location, availability, quality and price of those alternative fuel sources;

Previous wording

Changes in the coal industry that affect our customers, such as those caused by decreased electricity demand and increased competition, could also adversely affect our business. Indirect competition from natural gas-fired plants that are relatively more efficient, less expensive to construct and less difficult to permit than coal-fired plants has displaced a significant amount of coal-fired electric power generation and may continue to do so in the near term, particularly older, less efficient coal-fired power generators. Federal and state mandates for increased use of electricity derived from renewable energy sources could also affect demand for our coal. Such mandates, combined with other incentives to use renewable energy sources, such as tax credits, could make alternative fuel sources more competitive with coal. A decrease in coal consumption by the electric power generation industry could adversely affect the price of coal, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Current wording

Changes in the coal industry that affect our customers, such as those caused by decreased electricity demand and increased competition, could also adversely affect our business. Indirect competition from natural gas-fired plants that are relatively more efficient, less expensive to construct and less difficult to permit than coal-fired power plants has displaced a significant amount of coal-fired electric power generation and may continue to do so in the near term, particularly older, less efficient coal-fired electric power generators. Federal and state mandates for increased use of electricity derived from renewable energy sources could also affect demand for our coal. Such mandates, combined with other incentives to use renewable energy sources, such as tax credits, could make alternative fuel sources more competitive with coal. A decrease in coal consumption by the electric power generation industry could adversely affect the price of coal, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Previous wording

The metallurgical coal that we produce from the PAMC and the Itmann Mining Complex is sold to domestic and export customers involved in the production of steel. In addition, Arch’s principal product is a premium High-Vol metallurgical coal for blast furnace steel producers. Any deterioration in conditions in the U.S. or foreign steel industries, including a decrease in demand for steel or concerns regarding the continued financial viability of the industry, could reduce the demand for our metallurgical coal and could adversely impact the creditworthiness of our U.S. or foreign metallurgical coal customers and our ability to receive timely payments from these customers. In addition, the steel industry's demand for coal is affected by a number of factors, including the variable nature of that industry's business, technological developments in the steel-making process and the availability of substitutes for steel, such as aluminum, composites or plastics. When steel prices are lower, the prices that we charge steel industry customers for our metallurgical coal may decline, which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Current wording

The metallurgical coal that we produce is sold to domestic and export customers involved in the production of steel. Any deterioration in conditions in the U.S. or foreign steel industries, including a decrease in demand for steel or concerns regarding the continued financial viability of the industry, could reduce the demand for our metallurgical coal and could adversely impact the creditworthiness of our U.S. or foreign metallurgical coal customers and our ability to receive timely payments from these customers. In addition, the steel industry’s demand for coal is affected by a number of factors, including the variable nature of that industry’s business, technological developments in the steel-making process and the availability of substitutes for steel, such as aluminum, composites or plastics. When steel prices are lower, the prices that we charge steel industry customers for our metallurgical coal may decline, which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Previous wording

Also, premium High-Vol metallurgical coal generally commands a price premium over other forms of coal because of its value in use in blast furnaces for steel production. Premium High-Vol metallurgical coal has specific physical and chemical properties that can impact the efficiency of blast furnace operation. Alternative technologies are continually being investigated and developed with a view to reducing production costs or for other reasons, such as minimizing environmental or social impact. If competitive technologies emerge or are increasingly utilized that use other materials in place of our product or that diminish the required amount of our product, such as electric arc furnaces or pulverized coal injection processes, demand and price for our metallurgical coal might fall. Many of these alternative technologies are designed to use lower quality coals or other sources of carbon instead of higher cost High-Vol metallurgical coal. While conventional blast furnace technology has been the most economic large-scale steel production technology for several decades, and while emergent technologies typically take many years to commercialize, there can be no assurance that, over the longer term, competitive technologies not reliant on High-Vol metallurgical coal could emerge which could reduce demand and price premiums for High-Vol metallurgical coal.

Current wording

Also, premium High-Vol metallurgical coal generally commands a price premium over other forms of coal because of its value in use in blast furnaces for steel production. Premium High-Vol metallurgical coal has specific physical and chemical properties that can impact the efficiency of blast furnace operation. Alternative technologies are continually being investigated and developed with a view to reducing production costs or for other reasons, such as minimizing environmental or social impact. If competitive technologies emerge or are increasingly utilized that use other materials in place of our product or that diminish the required amount of our product, such as electric arc furnaces or pulverized coal injection processes, demand and price for our metallurgical coal might fall. Many of these alternative technologies are designed to use lower quality coals or other sources of carbon instead of higher cost High-Vol metallurgical coal. Over the longer term, the emergence of competitive technologies not reliant on High-Vol metallurgical coal could reduce demand and price premiums for High-Vol metallurgical coal.

Previous wording

The availability and reliability of modes of transportation and transportation facilities as well as fluctuations in transportation costs could affect the demand for our coal, and any significant damage to the CONSOL Marine Terminal that impacts its use could impair our ability to supply coal to our customers.

Current wording

The availability and reliability of modes of transportation and transportation facilities as well as fluctuations in transportation costs could affect the demand for our coal, and any significant damage to the Core Marine Terminal or the Dominion Terminal that impacts their use could impair our ability to supply coal to our customers.

Previous wording

Transportation logistics play an important role in allowing us to supply coal to our customers. Any significant delays, interruptions or other limitations on the ability to transport our coal could negatively affect our operations. Our coal is transported from our mines primarily by rail. To reach markets and end customers, our coal may also be transported by barge or by ocean vessels loaded at terminals, including our CONSOL Marine Terminal and DTA, in which we own a 35% interest following the Merger. Disruption of transportation services because of weather-related problems, strikes, lock-outs, terrorism, governmental regulation, third-party action or other events could temporarily impair our ability to supply coal to customers and adversely affect our profitability. For example, after a container ship struck a support column of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, Maryland causing it to collapse on March 26, 2024, vessel access in and out of the CONSOL Marine Terminal, which is located in the Port of Baltimore, was suspended. Until a channel was opened to normal operations on June 10, 2024, our inability to ship coal to our customers from the CONSOL Marine Terminal temporarily negatively impacted our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, transportation costs represent a significant portion of the delivered cost of coal and, as a result, the cost of delivery is a critical factor in a customer’s purchasing decision. Increases in transportation costs, including increases resulting from emission control requirements and fluctuation in the price of diesel fuel and demurrage, could make our coal less competitive. Any disruption of the transportation services we use or increase in transportation costs could have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Disruption in shipment levels over longer periods of time at the CONSOL Marine Terminal could cause our customers to look to other sources for their coal needs, negatively affecting our revenues and results of operations.

Current wording

Transportation logistics play a critical role in allowing us to supply coal to our customers. Any significant delays, interruptions or other limitations on the ability to transport our coal could negatively affect our operations. Our coal is transported from our mines primarily by rail. To reach markets and end customers, our coal may also be transported by barges or by ocean vessels loaded at terminals, including our wholly-owned Core Marine Terminal as well as the Dominion Terminal, operated by DTA, in which we own a 35% interest following the Merger. Disruption of transportation services because of weather-related problems, strikes, lock-outs, terrorism, governmental regulation, third-party action or other events could temporarily impair our ability to supply coal to customers and adversely affect our profitability. For example, after a container ship struck a support column of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, Maryland causing it to collapse on March 26, 2024, vessel access in and out of the Core Marine Terminal, which is located in the Port of Baltimore, was suspended. Until a channel was opened to normal operations on June 10, 2024, our inability to ship coal to our customers from the Core Marine Terminal temporarily negatively impacted our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, transportation costs represent a significant portion of the delivered cost of coal and, as a result, the cost of delivery is a critical factor in a customer’s purchasing decision. Increases in transportation costs, including increases resulting from emission control requirements and fluctuation in the price of diesel fuel and demurrage, could make our coal less competitive. Any disruption of the transportation services we use or increase in transportation costs could have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Disruption in shipment levels over longer periods of time at our East Coast terminals could cause our customers to look to other sources for their coal needs, negatively affecting our revenues and results of operations.

Previous wording

We compete with other producers primarily on the basis of price, coal quality, transportation costs and reliability of delivery. We compete with coal producers in various regions of the United States and with some foreign coal producers for domestic sales primarily to electric power generators. We also compete with both domestic and foreign coal producers for sales in international markets. Demand for our coal by our principal customers is affected by the delivered price of competing coals, other fuel supplies such as natural gas and petcoke, and alternative generating sources, including nuclear, natural gas, oil and renewable energy sources, such as hydroelectric, wind and solar power.

Current wording

We compete with other producers primarily on the basis of price, coal quality, transportation costs and reliability of delivery. We compete with coal producers in various regions of the U.S. and with some foreign coal producers for domestic sales primarily to electric power generators. We also compete with both domestic and foreign coal producers for sales in international markets. Demand for our coal by our principal customers is affected by the delivered price of competing coals, other fuel supplies such as natural gas and petcoke, and alternative generating sources, including nuclear, natural gas, oil and renewable energy sources, such as hydroelectric, wind and solar power.

Previous wording

We sell coal to foreign industrial end-users, electricity generators and to the more specialized metallurgical coal market, which are significantly affected by international demand and competition. The coal industry has experienced consolidation in recent years, including consolidation among some of our major competitors. As a result, a substantial portion of coal production is from companies that have significantly greater resources than we do. Current or further consolidation in the coal industry or current or future bankruptcy proceedings of coal competitors may adversely affect us. In addition, increases in coal prices could encourage existing producers to expand capacity or could encourage new producers to enter the market. If overcapacity results, the prices of and demand for our coal could significantly decline, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Current wording

We sell coal to foreign industrial end-users, electric power generators and to the more specialized metallurgical coal market, which are significantly affected by international demand and competition. The coal industry has experienced consolidation in recent years, including consolidation among some of our major competitors. Current or further consolidation in the coal industry or current or future bankruptcy proceedings of coal competitors may adversely affect us.

Previous wording

In addition, we face competition from foreign producers that sell their coal in the export market. Potential changes to international trade agreements, trade concessions or other political and economic arrangements may benefit coal producers operating in countries other than the United States. We may be adversely impacted on the basis of price or other factors with companies that in the future may benefit from favorable foreign trade policies or other arrangements. In addition, coal is sold internationally in U.S. dollars and, as a result, general economic conditions in foreign markets and changes in foreign currency exchange rates may provide our foreign competitors with a competitive advantage. If our competitors’ currencies decline against the U.S. dollar or against our foreign customers’ local currencies, those competitors may be able to offer lower prices for coal to our customers. Furthermore, if the currencies of our overseas customers were to significantly decline in value in comparison to the U.S. dollar, those customers may seek decreased prices for the coal we sell to them. Consequently, currency fluctuations could adversely affect the competitiveness of our coal in international markets, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Current wording

In addition, we face competition from foreign producers that sell their coal in the export market. Potential changes to international trade agreements, trade concessions or other political and economic arrangements may benefit coal producers operating in countries other than the U.S. We may be adversely impacted on the basis of price or other factors with companies that in the future may benefit from favorable foreign trade policies or other arrangements. In addition, coal is sold internationally in U.S. dollars and, as a result, general economic conditions in foreign markets and changes in foreign currency exchange rates may provide our foreign competitors with a competitive advantage. If our competitors’ currencies decline against the U.S. dollar or against our foreign customers’ local currencies, those competitors may be able to offer lower prices for coal to our customers. Furthermore, if the currencies of our overseas customers were to significantly decline in value in comparison to the U.S. dollar, those customers may seek decreased prices for the coal we sell to them. Consequently, currency fluctuations could adversely affect the competitiveness of our coal in international markets, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Previous wording

The United States, European Union and other large economies have recently experienced inflation at a rate significantly higher than recent years. While inflation has been easing, there can be no guarantee that this trend will continue. Current and future inflationary effects may be driven by, among other things, governmental stimulus and monetary policies, supply chain disruptions and geopolitical instability. This recent inflation has resulted in rising prices, including increases in freight rates, prices for energy and other costs, and has adversely impacted us and may further impact us negatively in the future. Sustained inflation could result in higher costs for transportation, energy, materials, supplies and labor. Our efforts to recover inflation-based cost increases from our customers may be hampered as a result of the structure of our contracts and the contract bidding process as well as competitive pressure in the industry, economic conditions and the countries to which we sell our export coal. Accordingly, substantial inflation may have an adverse impact on our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Inflation has also resulted in higher interest rates in the U.S., which could increase our cost of debt borrowing in the future.

Current wording

The U.S., European Union and other large economies have recently experienced inflation at a rate significantly higher than recent years. While inflation has been easing, there can be no guarantee that this trend will continue. Current and future inflationary effects may be driven by, among other things, governmental stimulus and monetary policies, supply chain disruptions and geopolitical instability. This recent inflation has resulted in rising prices, including increases in freight rates, prices for energy and other costs, and has adversely impacted us and may further impact us negatively in the future. Sustained inflation could result in higher costs for transportation, energy, materials, supplies and labor. Our ability to recover inflation-driven cost increases may be constrained by the terms of our contracts, the competitive nature of the contract bidding process and the economic and industry conditions prevailing in the countries to which we sell our export coal. Significant inflation may have an adverse impact on our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Inflation has also resulted in higher interest rates in the U.S., which could increase our cost of debt borrowing in the future.

Previous wording

For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, approximately 60%, 66% and 53%, respectively, of our annual coal revenue was derived from customers who exported our coal outside of the United States. A majority of Arch's metallurgical coal sales consist of sales to international customers, and we expect that international sales will continue to account for a large portion of our revenue. We believe that international markets will continue to account for a significant percentage of our revenue as we seek international expansion opportunities. The international markets are subject to a number of material risks, including, but not limited to:

Current wording

For the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, approximately 56%, 66% and 71%, respectively, of our annual coal revenue was derived from customers who exported our coal outside of the U.S., and we expect that international sales will continue to account for a large portion of our revenue as we seek international expansion opportunities. The international markets are subject to a number of material risks, including, but not limited to:

Previous wording

•changes in U.S. government policy with respect to these foreign countries may inhibit export of our products and limit potential customers' access to U.S. dollars in a country or region in which those potential customers are located;

Current wording

•changes in U.S. government policy with respect to certain foreign countries may inhibit export of our products and limit potential customers’ access to U.S. dollars in a country or region in which those potential customers are located;

Previous wording

Coal contains impurities, including sulfur, mercury, chlorine and other elements or compounds, many of which are released into the air along with fine particulate matter, nitrogen oxides and carbon dioxide when it is burned. Complying with regulations on these emissions can be costly for our customers, including those in the industrial, metallurgical and power generation markets. In order to comply with emissions standards promulgated under the federal Clean Air Act or similar state regulations seeking to limit the emissions that are generated as a result of coal combustion, coal users could be required to install costly emissions control devices, use or purchase emission credits or allowances, curtail operations or switch to other fuels, each of which has limitations. Because thermal coal currently accounts for a significant portion of our sales, our results could be materially affected by the extent to which our customers incur costs associated with controlling or limiting emissions from the use of coal or switch to alternative fuels. Rulemakings such as the Cross State Air Pollution Rule (“CSAPR”), the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (“NAAQS”), or the New Source Performance Standards (“NSPS”) and other Clean Air Act regulations may decrease the demand for our coal in industrial, metallurgical or electric power generation markets in the future. For more information, please see “Laws and Regulations” under Item 1 above.

Current wording

Coal contains impurities, including sulfur, mercury, chlorine and other elements or compounds, many of which are released into the air along with fine particulate matter, nitrogen oxides and carbon dioxide when it is burned. Complying with regulations on these emissions can be costly for our customers, including those in the industrial, metallurgical and electric power generation markets. In order to comply with emissions standards promulgated under the federal Clean Air Act or similar state regulations seeking to limit the emissions that are generated as a result of coal combustion, coal users could be required to install costly emissions control devices, use or purchase emissions credits or allowances, curtail operations or switch to other fuels, each of which has limitations. Because thermal coal currently accounts for a significant portion of our sales, our results could be materially affected by the extent to which our customers incur costs associated with controlling or limiting emissions from the use of coal or switch to alternative fuels. Rulemakings such as the Cross State Air Pollution Rule (“CSAPR”), the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (“NAAQS”), or the New Source Performance Standards (“NSPS”) and other Clean Air Act regulations may decrease the demand for our coal in industrial, metallurgical or electric power generation markets in the future. For more information, please see “Laws and Regulations” under Item 1 above.

Previous wording

Regulation to address climate change (or emissions of greenhouse gases including carbon dioxide and methane) and uncertainty regarding such regulation may affect us directly or indirectly by increasing our operating costs, reducing the value of our coal assets and adversely impacting the market for coal.

Current wording

Regulation to address climate change (or emissions of GHGs including carbon dioxide and methane) and uncertainty regarding such regulation may affect us directly or indirectly by increasing our operating costs, reducing the value of our coal assets and adversely impacting the market for coal.

Previous wording

The issue of global climate change continues to attract considerable public and scientific attention with widespread concern about the impacts of human activity (especially the emissions of GHGs such as carbon dioxide and methane). Combustion of fossil fuels, such as the coal we produce, results in the emission of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere by coal end-users, such as coal-fired electric power plants. Additionally, our coal mines release methane to the atmosphere during operations in order to promote a safe working environment for our miners underground.

Current wording

The issue of global climate change continues to attract considerable public and scientific attention with widespread concern about the impacts of human activity (especially the emissions of GHGs such as carbon dioxide and methane). Combustion of fossil fuels, such as the coal we produce, results in the emission of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere by coal end-users, such as coal-fired power plants. Additionally, methane released during our coal mining operations is ventilated to the atmosphere in order to promote a safe working environment for our miners underground.

Previous wording

Numerous proposals have been made and are likely to continue to be made at the international, national, regional and state levels of government that are intended to limit emissions of GHGs. The United States, for instance, has been a signatory to the United Nations-sponsored “Paris Agreement,” which requires nations party to the agreement to submit non-binding GHG emissions reduction goals every five years after 2020. On January 20, 2025, President Donald J. Trump issued an Executive Order directing the United States Ambassador to the United Nations to formally withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement. It is currently unclear what further action the administration will take to address climate change given this new policy direction. Nevertheless, the international community has been called upon to achieve a 43% reduction in GHG emissions by 2030 (compared to 2019 levels) through actions that drive the transition away from fossil fuels in energy systems. In addition, several individual U.S. states have already adopted measures requiring GHG emission reductions within their boundaries. Other states have elected to participate in regional cap-and-trade programs like the RGGI in the northeastern U.S. On November 1, 2023, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court issued its decision striking down Pennsylvania's participation in RGGI and determining that RGGI constitutes an illegal tax under the Pennsylvania Constitution. Following this decision, on November 21, 2023, Governor Josh Shapiro announced that the state will appeal the Commonwealth Court's decision. Any significant legislative changes at the international, national, state or local levels designed to reduce GHG emissions could significantly affect our ability to produce and sell our coal and develop our reserves, could increase the cost of the production and sale of coal and could materially reduce the value of our coal and coal reserves.

Current wording

In addition, several individual U.S. states have already adopted measures requiring GHG emissions reductions or a shift to renewable energy sources within their boundaries. Other states have elected to participate in regional cap-and-trade programs like the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (“RGGI”) in the northeastern U.S. Any significant legislative changes at the international, national, state or local levels designed to reduce GHG emissions could significantly affect our ability to produce and sell our coal and develop our reserves, could increase the cost of the production and sale of coal and could materially reduce the value of our coal and coal reserves.

Previous wording

Furthermore, adoption of comprehensive legislation or regulation focusing on climate change or GHG emission reductions for the United States or other countries where we sell coal, or the inability of utilities to obtain financing in connection with coal-fired plants, may make it more costly to operate coal-fired electric power generation plants and make coal less attractive for electric utility power plants in the future. Depending on the nature of the regulation or legislation, natural gas and/or alternative energy sources could gain added economic benefits versus coal-fueled power generation, especially if such regulation or legislation makes our coal more expensive as a result of increased compliance, operating and maintenance costs. Apart from actual regulation, uncertainty over the extent of regulation of GHG emissions may inhibit utilities from investing in the building of new coal-fired plants to replace older plants or investing in the upgrading of existing coal-fired plants. Any reduction in the amount of coal consumed by electric power generators as a result of actual or potential regulation of GHG emissions could decrease demand for our fossil fuels, thereby reducing our revenues and materially and adversely affecting our business and results of operations. Our customers may also have to invest in carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies in order to burn coal and comply with future GHG emission standards. Although we cannot predict the ultimate impact of any legislation or regulation, it is likely that any future laws, regulations or other policies aimed at reducing GHG emissions will negatively impact demand for our coal and could also negatively affect the value of our reserves and other assets.

Current wording

Furthermore, adoption of comprehensive legislation or regulation focusing on climate change or GHG emissions reductions for the U.S. or other countries where we sell coal, or the inability of utilities to obtain financing in connection with coal-fired power plants, may make it more costly to operate coal-fired power plants and make coal less attractive for electric utility power plants in the future. Depending on the nature of the regulation or legislation, natural gas and/or alternative energy sources could gain added economic benefits versus coal-fired power generation, especially if such regulation or legislation makes our coal more expensive as a result of increased compliance, operating and maintenance costs. Apart from actual regulation, uncertainty over the extent of regulation of GHG emissions may inhibit utilities from investing in the building of new coal-fired power plants to replace older plants or investing in the upgrading of existing coal-fired power plants. Any reduction in the amount of coal consumed by electric power generators as a result of actual or potential regulation of GHG emissions could decrease demand for our fossil fuels, thereby reducing our revenues and materially and adversely affecting our business and results of operations. Our customers may also have to invest in carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies in order to burn coal and comply with future GHG emissions standards. Although we cannot predict the ultimate impact of any legislation or regulation, it is likely that any future laws, regulations or other policies aimed at reducing GHG emissions will negatively impact demand for our coal and could also negatively affect the value of our reserves and other assets.

Previous wording

Additionally, if emissions of methane from coal mines are regulated in the future, we would likely be required to install additional pollution control devices, pay fees or taxes for our emissions or incur expenses associated with the purchase of emissions credits, in order to continue operation. Alternatively, we may need to curtail coal production. The magnitude of impact on our operations, capital expenditures, financial condition or cash flows would be dependent on the structure of any proposed regulation and the degree of emission reduction prescribed.

Current wording

Additionally, if emissions of methane from coal mines are regulated in the future, we would likely be required to install additional pollution control devices, pay fees or taxes for our emissions or incur expenses associated with the purchase of emissions credits in order to continue operation. Alternatively, we may need to curtail coal production. The magnitude of impact on our operations, capital expenditures, financial condition or cash flows would be dependent on the structure of any proposed regulation and the degree of emissions reduction prescribed.

Previous wording

Increasing attention to climate change risk has also resulted in a recent trend of governmental investigations and private litigation by local and state governmental agencies as well as private plaintiffs in an effort to hold energy companies accountable for the effects of climate change. Other public nuisance lawsuits have been brought in the past against power, coal, oil and gas companies alleging that their operations are contributing to climate change. The plaintiffs in these suits sought various remedies, including punitive and compensatory damages and injunctive relief. While the U.S. Supreme Court held that any federal common law had been displaced by the CAA and thus dismissed the public nuisance claims against the defendants in those cases, tort-type liabilities remain a possibility and a source of concern. For instance, we have been named as a defendant in multiple lawsuits brought by the City of Baltimore, the State of Delaware, the City of Annapolis, and Anne Arundel County, Maryland seeking to hold us and other energy companies liable for the effects of climate change caused by the release of GHGs. The outcome of this litigation is uncertain, and we could incur substantial legal costs associated with defending these and similar lawsuits in the future. Government entities in other states have brought similar claims seeking to hold a wide variety of companies that produce fossil fuels liable for the alleged impacts of the GHG emissions attributable to those fuels or for other grounds related to climate change, such as improper disclosure of climate change risks. Those lawsuits allege damages as a result of climate change and the plaintiffs are seeking unspecified damages and abatement under various tort theories. We have not been made a party to these other suits, but it is possible that we could be included in similar future lawsuits initiated by state and local governments as well as private claimants.

Current wording

Increasing attention to climate change risk has also resulted in governmental investigations and private litigation by local and state governmental agencies as well as private plaintiffs in an effort to hold energy companies accountable for the effects of climate change. Other public nuisance lawsuits have been brought in the past against power, coal, oil and gas companies alleging that their operations are contributing to climate change. The plaintiffs in these suits sought various remedies, including punitive and compensatory damages and injunctive relief. While the U.S. Supreme Court held that any federal common law had been displaced by the CAA and thus dismissed the public nuisance claims against the defendants in those cases, tort-type liabilities remain a possibility and a source of concern. For instance, we have been named as a defendant in multiple lawsuits brought by the City of Baltimore, the State of Delaware, the City of Annapolis, and Anne Arundel County, Maryland seeking to hold us and other energy companies liable for the effects of climate change caused by the release of GHGs. The outcome of this litigation is uncertain, due to the range of legal theories and the various court systems in which they are taking place, including for appeals. Even if we are ultimately successful, we could incur substantial legal costs associated with defending these and similar lawsuits in the future. Government entities in other states, as well as private plaintiffs, have brought similar claims seeking to hold a wide variety of companies that produce fossil fuels liable for climate-related impacts or for insufficient disclosure of associated risks, often seeking unspecified damages and abatement under various tort theories. We have not been made a party to these other suits, but it is possible that we could be included in similar future lawsuits initiated by state and local governments as well as private claimants.

Previous wording

Our coal mining operations are underground mines. Underground mining and related processing activities present inherent risks of injury or death to persons, damage to property and equipment and other potential legal or other liabilities. In addition, Arch's mining operations include surface mining operations that utilize explosives to remove the earth and rock covering the coal, which creates additional hazards. Our mines are subject to a number of operating risks that could disrupt operations, decrease production and increase the cost of mining at particular mines for varying lengths of time, thereby adversely affecting our operating results. In addition, if an operating risk occurs in our mining operations, we may not be able to produce sufficient amounts of coal to deliver under our multi-year coal contracts. Our inability to satisfy contractual obligations could result in our customers initiating claims against us or canceling their contracts. The operating risks that may have a significant impact on our coal operations include:

Current wording

Certain of our coal mining operations are underground mines. Underground mining and related processing activities present inherent risks of injury or death to persons, damage to property and equipment and other potential legal or other liabilities. We also have surface mining operations that utilize explosives to remove the earth and rock covering the coal, which creates additional hazards. Our mines are subject to a number of operating risks that could disrupt operations, decrease production and increase the cost of mining at particular mines for varying lengths of time, thereby adversely affecting our operating results. In addition, if an operating risk occurs in our mining operations, we may not be able to produce sufficient amounts of coal to deliver under our multi-year coal contracts. Our inability to satisfy contractual obligations could result in our customers initiating claims against us or canceling their contracts. The operating risks that may have a significant impact on our coal operations include:

Previous wording

The occurrence of any of these risks at our coal mining operations could adversely affect our ability to conduct our operations or result in substantial loss to us, either of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, the occurrence of any of these events in our coal mining operations which prevents our delivery of coal to a customer and which is not excusable as a force majeure event under our coal sales agreement could result in economic penalties, suspension or cancellation of shipments or ultimately termination of the coal sales agreement, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Current wording

The occurrence of any of these risks at our coal mining operations could adversely affect our ability to conduct our operations or result in substantial loss to us, either of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. For example, in January 2025, the Company sealed the Leer South mine’s active longwall panel in order to extinguish isolated combustion-related activity at the mine and did not resume longwall operations until December 2025. In addition, the occurrence of any of these events in our coal mining operations which prevents our delivery of coal to a customer and which is not excusable as a force majeure event under our coal sales agreement could result in economic penalties, suspension or cancellation of shipments or ultimately termination of the coal sales agreement, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Previous wording

Although we maintain insurance for a number of risks and hazards, we may not be insured or fully insured against the losses or liabilities that could arise from a significant accident in our coal operations. We may elect not to obtain insurance for any or all of these risks if we believe that the cost of available insurance is excessive relative to the risks presented. In addition, pollution and environmental risks generally are not fully insurable. Moreover, a significant mine accident could potentially cause a mine shutdown. The occurrence of an event that is not fully covered by insurance could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Current wording

In addition, we may not be insured or fully insured against the losses or liabilities that could arise from a significant accident in our coal operations. We may elect not to obtain insurance for any or all of these risks if we believe that the cost of available insurance is excessive relative to the risks presented. In addition, pollution and environmental risks generally are not fully insurable. Moreover, a significant mine accident could potentially cause a mine shutdown. The occurrence of an event that is not fully covered by insurance could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Previous wording

Federal and state laws require us to obtain surety bonds or post letters of credit to secure performance or payment of certain long-term obligations, such as mine closure or reclamation costs, federal and state workers' compensation costs, coal leases and other obligations. Over the past few years, the insurance and surety markets have been increasingly challenging, particularly for coal companies. We have experienced rising premiums, reduced coverage and/or fewer providers willing to underwrite policies and surety bonds. Terms have generally become more unfavorable, including increases in the amount of collateral required to secure surety bonds. However, more recently, we have seen insurance rates stabilize and even decrease on certain lines of coverage, as new insurance carriers have entered the market, although there is no assurance that this stabilization or decrease will be sustained or continued. In addition, federal and state regulators are considering making financial assurance requirements more stringent and costly with respect to self-insured coal workers' pneumoconiosis, mine closure and reclamation security amounts. Because we are required by federal and state law to have these bonds in place before mining can commence or continue, our failure to maintain surety bonds, letters of credit or other guarantees or security arrangements would materially and adversely affect our ability to mine or lease coal, and incurring additional rising costs to obtain and maintain such arrangements could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Additionally, coal and other mining companies are increasingly struggling to obtain adequate insurance coverage for their business and operations. Our failure to obtain adequate insurance coverages could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Further cost burdens on our ability to maintain adequate insurance and bond coverage may adversely impact our operations, financial position and liquidity.

Current wording

Federal and state laws require us to obtain surety bonds or post letters of credit to secure performance or payment of certain long-term obligations, such as mine closure or reclamation costs, federal and state workers’ compensation costs, coal leases and other obligations. Over the past few years, the insurance and surety markets have been increasingly challenging, particularly for coal companies. We have experienced rising premiums, reduced coverage and/or fewer providers willing to underwrite policies and surety bonds. Terms have generally become more unfavorable, including increases in the amount of collateral required to secure surety bonds. However, more recently, we have seen insurance rates and collateral requirements stabilize and even decrease on certain lines of coverage, as new insurance carriers have entered the market, although there is no assurance that this stabilization or decrease will be sustained or continued. In addition, federal and state regulators are considering making financial assurance requirements more stringent and costly with respect to self-insured coal workers’ pneumoconiosis, mine closure and reclamation security amounts. Because we are required by federal and state law to have these bonds in place before mining can commence or continue, our failure to maintain surety bonds, letters of credit or other guarantees or security arrangements would materially and adversely affect our ability to mine or lease coal, and incurring additional rising costs to obtain and maintain such arrangements could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Additionally, coal and other mining companies are increasingly struggling to obtain adequate insurance coverage for their business and operations. Our failure to obtain adequate insurance coverages could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Further cost burdens on our ability to maintain adequate insurance and bond coverage may adversely impact our operations, financial position and liquidity.

Previous wording

For reserves outside of our permits, we engage in discussions with drilling and transport companies on potential areas on which they can drill that may have a minimal effect on our mine plan. If a well is in the path of our mining for coal on land that has not yet been permitted for our mining activities, we may not be able to mine through the well unless we purchase it. Although we have purchased vertical wells in the past, the cost of purchasing a producing horizontal well could be substantially greater than that of a vertical well. Horizontal wells with multiple laterals extending from the well pad may access larger oil and natural gas reserves than a vertical well, which would typically result in a higher cost to acquire. The cost associated with purchasing oil and natural gas wells that are in the path of our coal mining activities could likewise make mining through those wells uneconomical, thereby effectively causing a loss of significant portions of our coal reserves, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Current wording

For reserves outside of our permits, we engage in discussions with drilling and transport companies on potential areas on which they can drill that may have a minimal effect on our mine plan. If a well is in the path of our mining for coal on land that has not yet been permitted for our mining activities, we may not be able to mine through the well unless we purchase it. The cost of purchasing a producing horizontal well could be substantially greater than that of a vertical well. Horizontal wells with multiple laterals extending from the well pad may access larger oil and natural gas reserves than a vertical well, which would typically result in a higher cost to acquire. The cost associated with purchasing oil and natural gas wells that are in the path of our coal mining activities could likewise make mining through those wells uneconomical, thereby effectively causing a loss of significant portions of our coal reserves, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Previous wording

Certain organizations that provide corporate governance and other corporate risk information to investors and stockholders have developed scores and ratings to evaluate companies and investment funds based upon ESG or “sustainability” metrics. Currently, there are no universal standards for such scores or ratings, but companies in the energy industry, and in particular those focused on coal, natural gas or petroleum extraction and refining, often perform less well under ESG assessments compared to companies in other industries. The importance of sustainability evaluations is becoming more broadly accepted by investors and stockholders. Indeed, many investment funds focus on positive ESG business practices and sustainability scores when making investments. In addition, investors, particularly institutional investors, use these scores to benchmark companies against their peers and if a company is perceived as lagging, these investors may engage with companies to require improved ESG disclosure or performance. Moreover, certain members of the broader investment community may consider a company's sustainability score as a reputational or other factor in making an investment decision. Consequently, a low ESG or sustainability score could result in our securities, both debt and equity, being excluded from the portfolios of certain investment funds and investors. Additionally, many investment funds and investors are beginning to avoid securities issued by any company in the coal, natural gas or petroleum extraction or refining business, regardless of their particular ESG or sustainability score. There have also been efforts in recent years affecting the investment community, including investment advisers, sovereign wealth funds, public pension funds, universities and other groups, promoting the divestment of fossil fuel equities, encouraging the consideration of ESG practices of companies in a manner that negatively affects coal companies, and also pressuring lenders to limit funding to companies engaged in the extraction of fossil fuel reserves. Relatedly, banks and investment banks based both domestically and internationally have announced that they have adopted climate change guidelines for lenders. The guidelines require the evaluation of carbon risks in the financing of electric power generation plants which may make it more difficult for utilities to obtain financing for coal-fired plants. The impact of such efforts may adversely affect the demand for and price of securities issued by us, and impact our access to the capital and financial markets. As such, our access to capital to fund our continuing operations and growth and diversification opportunities could become more restricted.

Current wording

Certain organizations that provide corporate governance and other corporate risk information to investors and stockholders have developed scores and ratings to evaluate companies and investment funds based upon ESG or “sustainability” metrics. Currently, there are no universal standards for such scores or ratings, but companies in the energy industry, and in particular those focused on coal, natural gas or petroleum extraction and refining, often perform less well under ESG assessments compared to companies in other industries. The importance of sustainability evaluations is becoming more broadly accepted by investors and stockholders, and poor performance or perceived performance on various ESG matters could result in our securities, both debt and equity, being excluded from the portfolios of certain investment funds and investors. Additionally, many investment funds and investors are beginning to avoid securities issued by any company in the coal, natural gas or petroleum extraction or refining business, regardless of their particular ESG or sustainability score. Relatedly, banks and investment banks based both domestically and internationally have announced that they have adopted climate change guidelines for lenders. The guidelines require the evaluation of carbon risks in the financing of electric power plants which may make it more difficult for utilities to obtain financing for coal-fired power plants. The impact of such efforts may adversely affect the demand for and price of securities issued by us and impact our access to the capital and financial markets. As such, our access to capital to fund our continuing operations and growth and diversification opportunities could become more restricted. Additionally, various policymakers have adopted or are considering adopting requirements for certain disclosures or other actions regarding climate or other ESG-related matters. These regulations are not uniform, and other policymakers have advocated for positions to restrict companies’ consideration of ESG factors. Such regulations increase the cost and complexity of compliance and associated risks.

Previous wording

While we may publish voluntary disclosures regarding ESG matters or take other actions from time to time, in an effort to improve the ESG profile of our operations or products, we cannot guarantee that these efforts will have the desired effect. For example, our voluntary disclosures may include statements based on assumptions, estimates or third-party information we believe to be reasonable, but which may be uncertain, variable or erroneous. In addition, we may commit to certain ESG initiatives over time, such as investing capital in projects and technologies to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions profile; however, we may not ultimately be able to achieve our goals or reach our commitments, either on the timeframes or costs initially anticipated or at all, due to factors within or outside of our control. Various business units or components of the Company have previously established climate change-related goals and targets. As a result of the Merger and continued efforts to harmonize policies across the new, combined company, the Company has suspended its previous goals and targets and is in the process of reevaluating those policies for the Company as a whole, consistent with investor and stakeholder expectations. If we do not, or are perceived to not, adapt or comply with investor or stakeholder expectations and standards on ESG matters, we may suffer from reputational damage and an increased risk of litigation or activism, and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Current wording

While we may publish voluntary disclosures regarding ESG matters or take other actions from time to time in an effort to improve the ESG profile of our operations or products, we cannot guarantee that these efforts will have the desired effect. For example, our voluntary disclosures may include statements based on assumptions, estimates or third-party information we believe to be reasonable, but which may be uncertain, variable or erroneous. In addition, we may commit to certain ESG initiatives over time, such as investing capital in projects and technologies to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions profile; however, we may not ultimately be able to achieve our goals or reach our commitments, either on the timeframes or costs initially anticipated or at all, due to factors within or outside of our control. Various business units or components of the Company have previously established climate change-related goals and targets. As a result of the Merger and continued efforts to harmonize policies across the new, combined company, the Company has suspended its previous goals and targets and is in the process of reevaluating those policies for the Company as a whole. However, stakeholder expectations vary and, at times, can conflict. Any failure to successfully address such expectations, including regulatory developments, may result in reputational damage, loss of customers or other adverse stakeholder engagement and an increased risk of litigation or activism, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.