ARTIVION, INC.

Previous wording

As an example of this risk, via a Ministerial Decree of July 6, 2022, published September 15, 2022, the Italian government stated that the spending ceiling for medical devices at the national and regional levels had been exceeded, requiring medical device companies to pay back alleged overpayments the government claims companies received between 2015 and 2018. Artivion’s repayment exposure for the period between 2015 and 2018 is estimated at approximately€215,000, which is subject to change as negotiations between us, industry representatives, and the Italian government are ongoing.

Current wording

As an example of this risk, via a Ministerial Decree of July 6, 2022, published September 15, 2022, the Italian government stated that the spending ceiling for medical devices at the national and regional levels had been exceeded, requiring medical device companies to pay back alleged overpayments the government claims companies received between 2015 and 2018. Ultimately, following the conclusion of judicial challenges, in August 2025 the Italian parliament agreed to a 75% reduction in the amounts due for the 2015–2018 period, which resulted in a payment obligation of approximately 0.1 million euros. In September 2025 we fulfilled that payment obligation.

Previous wording

The market for our products and services is competitive and affected by new product introductions and activities of other industry participants, including the introduction of novel products and therapies aimed at unrelated disease states or even overall patient health. In addition, such products and therapies like GLP-1 drugs, which we believe have or will have little to no actual impact on demand for our products, can lead to investor and customer confusion, can change investor focus, and can impact the perceived demand for our products, which may affect our stock price even if actual demand for our products is unaffected. We face intense competition in virtually all of our product lines, from, among others, Baxter, Ethicon (a Johnson & Johnson Company), Medtronic, Abbott Laboratories, Edwards Lifesciences, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Integra Life Sciences, LifeNet Health, Corcym, Anteris Technologies, Elutia (formerly Aziyo Biologics), Cook Medical, Gore & Associates, Terumo, LeMaitre Vascular, Maquet, Pfizer, and BioCer Entwicklungs-GmbH, and Grena Limited. Several of our competitors enjoy competitive advantages over us, including:

Current wording

The market for our products and services is competitive and affected by new product introductions and activities of other industry participants, including the introduction of novel products and therapies aimed at unrelated disease states or even overall patient health. In addition, such products and therapies like GLP-1 drugs, which we believe have or will have little to no actual impact on demand for our products, can lead to investor and customer confusion, can change investor focus, and can impact the perceived demand for our products, which may affect our stock price even if actual demand for our products is unaffected. We face intense competition in virtually all of our product lines, from, among others, Baxter, Ethicon (a Johnson & Johnson Company), Medtronic, Abbott Laboratories, Edwards Lifesciences, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Integra Life Sciences, LifeNet Health, Corcym, Anteris Technologies, Elutia (formerly Aziyo Biologics), Cook Medical, Gore & Associates, Terumo, LeMaitre Vascular, Maquet, Pfizer, BioCer Entwicklungs-GmbH, and Grena Limited. Several of our competitors enjoy competitive advantages over us, including:

Previous wording

Our aortic stent graft systems consist of two main product components: the stent graft and the delivery system. The stent graft is manufactured from several different raw materials that are manufactured internally or at various external suppliers, including single suppliers. The delivery systems we manufacture are comprised of several different raw materials and subassemblies. Our internal manufacturing processes include machining of plastic parts, suturing of stent grafts, processing of Nitinol, and weaving of textiles. Our conventional polyester grafts consist of two main product components: polyester fabric and collagen coating. The polyester fabric is woven from a few different yarns that are supplied by an external supplier. The collagen suspension we manufacture is comprised of a collagenous tissue that is supplied by a single supplier. The conventional ePTFE grafts we manufacture are comprised of various raw materials supplied by several suppliers. For some products the ePTFE grafts are heparin coated. For these products, the heparin suspension we manufacture is comprised of a heparin solution that is also supplied by an external supplier.

Current wording

Our aortic stent graft systems consist of two main product components: the stent graft and the delivery system. The stent graft is manufactured from several different raw materials that are manufactured internally or at various external suppliers, including single suppliers. The delivery systems we manufacture are comprised of several different raw materials and subassemblies, some of which are sourced from external suppliers, including single suppliers. Our internal manufacturing processes include machining of plastic parts, suturing of stent grafts, processing of Nitinol, and weaving of textiles. Our conventional polyester grafts consist of two main product components: polyester fabric and collagen coating. The polyester fabric is woven from a few different yarns that are supplied by an external supplier. The collagen suspension we manufacture is comprised of a collagenous tissue that is supplied by a single supplier. The conventional ePTFE grafts we manufacture are comprised of various raw materials supplied by several suppliers. For some products the ePTFE grafts are heparin coated. For these products, the heparin suspension we manufacture is comprised of a heparin solution that is also supplied by an external supplier.

Previous wording

Governments, investors, customers, employees and other stakeholders are continuing to focus on areas of corporate responsibility, and particularly matters related to environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors. Stakeholders are looking to companies that demonstrate strong ESG and sustainability practices as an indicator of long-term resilience. However, there is an increasing number of state-level and federal legislation, executive orders and other backlash against ESG matters that may conflict with other regulatory requirements or our various stakeholders’ expectations. Keeping up with and meeting these sometimes contradictory and evolving expectations can be difficult and expensive, and may disrupt our business and divert the attention of our management. We may be unable to make the investments in ESG programs that our competitors with greater financial resources are able to make or we may be challenged by governmental authorities if we choose to make such investments. Failure to meet the expectations of investors, other stakeholders, or certain governmental authorities in these areas may damage our reputation, impact employee retention, impact the willingness of our customers to do business with us, or otherwise impact our financial results and stock price.

Current wording

Certain governments, investors, customers, employees and other stakeholders are continuing to focus on areas of corporate responsibility, and particularly matters related to environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors. In some cases, stakeholders are looking to companies that demonstrate strong ESG and sustainability practices as an indicator of long-term resilience. However, there is an increasing number of state-level and federal legislation, executive orders and other backlash against ESG matters that may conflict with other regulatory requirements or our various stakeholders’ expectations. Keeping up with and meeting these sometimes contradictory and evolving expectations can be difficult and expensive, and may disrupt our business and divert the attention of our management. We may be unable to make the investments in ESG programs that our competitors with greater financial resources are able to make or we may be challenged by governmental authorities if we choose to make such investments. Failure to meet the expectations of investors, other stakeholders, or certain governmental authorities in these areas may damage our reputation, impact employee retention, impact the willingness of our customers to do business with us, or otherwise impact our financial results and stock price.

Previous wording

•Our Notified Bodies: The combination of the increased regulatory framework under the MDR and the UK’s exit from the European Union have both had an impact on notified bodies. The MDR has significantly increased the workload on existing notified bodies and as a result, many have elected to leave the space, including our Notified Body in the UK, LRQA. Although we were able to transition our LRQA-issued certification for BioGlue to a new notified body, DEKRA, we are still in the process of transitioning the LRQA-issue certification for PhotoFix and we periodically review the need to change notified bodies; and

Current wording

•Our Notified Bodies: The combination of the increased regulatory framework under the MDR and the UK’s exit from the European Union have both had an impact on notified bodies. The MDR has significantly increased the workload on existing notified bodies and as a result, many have elected to leave the space, including our Notified Body in the UK, LRQA. We have been able to transition our LRQA-issued certification for BioGlue and PhotoFix to a new notified body, DEKRA; and

Previous wording

As an example of this risk, in September 2022 we halted the PROACT Xa clinical trial based on the recommendation of the trial’s Data and Safety Monitoring Board (“DSMB”) due to insufficient evidence to support non-inferiority of apixaban to warfarin for valve thrombosis and thromboembolism. Similarly, in November 2023 we announced that we were no longer pursuing a labeling change for our On-X mitral valve in connection with our PROACT Mitral trial due to additional investments that would be required to do so. Finally, although we recently received regulatory approval to market BioGlue in China, it was only after a significantly longer and more expensive regulatory approval process than likely could reasonably have been anticipated when the program began.

Current wording

As an example of this risk, in September 2022 we halted the PROACT Xa clinical trial based on the recommendation of the trial’s Data and Safety Monitoring Board (“DSMB”) due to insufficient evidence to support non-inferiority of apixaban to warfarin for valve thrombosis and thromboembolism. Similarly, in November 2023 we announced that we were no longer pursuing a labeling change for our On-X mitral valve in connection with our PROACT Mitral trial due to additional investments that would be required to do so. Finally, although we have received regulatory approval to market BioGlue in China, it was only after a significantly longer and more expensive regulatory approval process than likely could reasonably have been anticipated when the program began.

Previous wording

In response to perceived increases in healthcare costs in recent years, there have been, and continue to be, proposals by the governmental authorities, third-party payors, and elected office holders and candidates to impact public health, control healthcare costs and, more generally, to reform the healthcare systems. These changes may impact costs and reimbursement, as well as potential changes to the regulatory environment and healthcare generally. Many US healthcare laws, including the Affordable Care Act and the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act, are complex, subject to change particularly during a change in administrations, and dependent on interpretation and enforcement decisions from government agencies with broad discretion. Changes in regulations, federal funding or staffing at administrative agencies like the FDA may impact, for example, the speed at which we are able to obtain regulatory reviews and approvals, and changes in the focus of those administrative agencies may result in the repeal of applicable regulations or guidance or impact us in other ways we cannot anticipate. This could delay clinical trials and product launches, impact the regulatory status of current products or services, or affect our competitive position. The impact of this uncertainty on us, our customers, or the specific services and relationships we have with our customers is not always clear. Our failure to accurately anticipate these changes, or our failure to comply with changes to legal and regulatory frameworks, could create liability for us, result in adverse publicity and negatively affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Current wording

In response to perceived increases in healthcare costs in recent years, there have been, and continue to be, proposals by the governmental authorities, third-party payors, and elected office holders and candidates to impact public health, control healthcare costs and, more generally, to reform the healthcare systems. These changes may impact costs and reimbursement, as well as potential changes to the regulatory environment and healthcare generally. Many US healthcare laws, including the Affordable Care Act and the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act, are complex, subject to change particularly during a change in administrations, and dependent on interpretation and enforcement decisions from government agencies with broad discretion. Changes in regulations, federal funding or staffing at administrative agencies like the FDA, along with the recent, and ongoing, federal government shutdown, may impact, for example, the speed at which we are able to obtain regulatory reviews and approvals. In addition, changes in the focus of those administrative agencies may result in the repeal of applicable regulations or guidance or impact us in other ways we cannot anticipate. This could delay clinical trials and product launches, impact the regulatory status of current products or services, or affect our competitive position. The impact of this uncertainty on us, our customers, or the specific services and relationships we have with our customers is not always clear. Our failure to accurately anticipate these changes, or our failure to comply with changes to legal and regulatory frameworks, could create liability for us, result in adverse publicity and negatively affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Previous wording

We are subject to an increasing number of federal, state, and foreign laws and regulations to address topics relating to data privacy, sustainability, and artificial intelligence. These regulations, some of which can be enforced by private parties or governmental entities, have been or are being promulgated and are constantly evolving and becoming increasingly complex and rigorous. These laws and regulations may include new compliance or disclosure requirements which increases our operating costs and requires significant management investment. Many of these laws and regulations, including the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) also include significant penalties for noncompliance. Although our practices, policies, and procedures are intended to comply with relevant laws and regulations, there can be no assurance that regulatory or enforcement authorities will view our arrangements as being in compliance, or that one or more of our employees or agents will not disregard aspects of our compliance programs. Any resulting government enforcement activities may be costly, result in negative publicity, or subject us to significant penalties.

Current wording

We are subject to an increasing number of federal, state, and foreign laws and regulations to address topics relating to data privacy, sustainability, and artificial intelligence. These regulations, some of which can be enforced by private parties or governmental entities, have been or are being promulgated and are constantly evolving and becoming increasingly complex and rigorous. These laws and regulations may include new compliance or disclosure requirements which increases our operating costs and requires significant management investment. Many of these laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) also include significant penalties for noncompliance. Although our practices, policies, and procedures are intended to comply with relevant laws and regulations, there can be no assurance that regulatory or enforcement authorities will view our arrangements as being in compliance, or that one or more of our employees or agents will not disregard aspects of our compliance programs. Any resulting government enforcement activities may be costly, result in negative publicity, or subject us to significant penalties.