ARTIVION, INC.
For the period ended Jun 30, 2025. Filed Aug 8, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Jun 30, 2025 · Filed Aug 8, 2025
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-Q
Period ended 2025-03-31; filed 2025-05-06.
0000784199-25-000074
Item 1A. Risk FactorsCurrent report: 10-Q
Period ended 2025-06-30; filed 2025-08-08.
0001628280-25-039166
Item 1A. Risk FactorsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 181 previous paragraphs and 183 current paragraphs.
174 unchanged; 7 reworded; 2 added; 0 removed; 0 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (2)
Current report
Recent healthcare and tax legislation could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Current report
On July 4, 2025 President Trump signed into law the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” which introduces comprehensive changes to U.S. tax and healthcare laws. We are still assessing the impact of this new legislation and we may not know the full impact of the legislation for some time, as many of its provisions will require interpretation and implementing regulations from federal agencies, including the Department of the Treasury. The law’s provisions include, but are not limited to, changes in corporate income tax rates and other business deductions, as well as changes to healthcare-related programs. The uncertainty surrounding these and other provisions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. We will continue to evaluate the impact of the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” as additional information and guidance becomes available.
Reworded paragraphs (7)
Previous wording
Our business involves a variety of risks and uncertainties, known and unknown, including, among others, the risks discussed below. These risks should be carefully considered together with the other information provided in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our other filings with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Our failure to adequately anticipate or address these risks and uncertainties may have a material, adverse impact on our business, reputation, revenues, financial condition, profitability, and cash flows. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known or knowable to us, or that we currently believe to be immaterial, may also adversely affect our business.
Current wording
Our business involves a variety of risks and uncertainties, known and unknown, including, among others, the risks discussed below. These risks should be carefully considered together with the other information provided in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our other filings with the SEC. Our failure to adequately anticipate or address these risks and uncertainties may have a material, adverse impact on our business, reputation, revenues, financial condition, profitability, and cash flows. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known or knowable to us, or that we currently believe to be immaterial, may also adversely affect our business.
Previous wording
As an example of this risk, via a Ministerial Decree of July 6, 2022, published September 15, 2022, the Italian government stated that the spending ceiling for medical devices at the national and regional levels had been exceeded, requiring medical device companies to pay back alleged overpayments the government claims companies received between 2015 and 2018. Ultimately, we were subject to an immaterial payment obligation following the conclusion of judicial challenges and negotiations between us, industry, US government representatives, and the Italian government.
Current wording
As an example of this risk, via a Ministerial Decree of July 6, 2022, published September 15, 2022, the Italian government stated that the spending ceiling for medical devices at the national and regional levels had been exceeded, requiring medical device companies to pay back alleged overpayments the government claims companies received between 2015 and 2018. Artivion’s repayment exposure for the period between 2015 and 2018 is estimated at approximately€215,000, which is subject to change as negotiations between us, industry representatives, and the Italian government are ongoing.
Previous wording
The market for our products and services is competitive and affected by new product introductions and activities of other industry participants, including the introduction of novel products and therapies aimed at unrelated disease states or even overall patient health. In addition, such products and therapies like GLP-1 drugs, which we believe have or will have little to no actual impact on demand for our products, can lead to investor and customer confusion, can change investor focus, and can impact the perceived demand for our products, which may affect our stock price even if actual demand for our products is unaffected. We face intense competition in virtually all of our product lines, from, among others, Baxter, Ethicon (a Johnson & Johnson Company), Medtronic, Abbott Laboratories, Edwards Lifesciences, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Integra Life Sciences, LifeNet Health, Corcym, Anteris Technologies, Elutia (formerly Aziyo Biologics), Cook Medical, Gore & Associates, Terumo, LeMaitre Vascular, Maquet, Pfizer, and BioCer Entwicklungs-GmbH. Several of our competitors enjoy competitive advantages over us, including:
Current wording
The market for our products and services is competitive and affected by new product introductions and activities of other industry participants, including the introduction of novel products and therapies aimed at unrelated disease states or even overall patient health. In addition, such products and therapies like GLP-1 drugs, which we believe have or will have little to no actual impact on demand for our products, can lead to investor and customer confusion, can change investor focus, and can impact the perceived demand for our products, which may affect our stock price even if actual demand for our products is unaffected. We face intense competition in virtually all of our product lines, from, among others, Baxter, Ethicon (a Johnson & Johnson Company), Medtronic, Abbott Laboratories, Edwards Lifesciences, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Integra Life Sciences, LifeNet Health, Corcym, Anteris Technologies, Elutia (formerly Aziyo Biologics), Cook Medical, Gore & Associates, Terumo, LeMaitre Vascular, Maquet, Pfizer, and BioCer Entwicklungs-GmbH, and Grena Limited. Several of our competitors enjoy competitive advantages over us, including:
Previous wording
As an example of this risk, in January 2025, the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (“CBER”) of the FDA issued two “final” guidance documents directed at the reduction of the risk of transmission of tuberculousis (Mtb) in processed human tissue (the “Guidances”), which is already exceedingly low. We believe these Guidances, if implemented as written, could significantly reduce the supply of safe implantable human tissue without simultaneously reducing the risk of Mtb transmission. Although some industry advocates and health care practitioners have expressed strong opposition to these new Guidances, and their implementation has been paused until at least May 2025, if and how they may ultimately be implemented and enforced, and how they may actually impact the availability of our donated tissue, remains to be seen and is difficult to predict.
Current wording
As an example of this risk, in January 2025, the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (“CBER”) of the FDA issued two “final” guidance documents directed at the reduction of the risk of transmission of tuberculousis (Mtb) in processed human tissue (the “Guidances”), which is already exceedingly low. In May 2025, the “final” Guidances were withdrawn and re-issued as drafts, with a public comment period that ended in July 2025. We and a number of other parties filed comments, the vast majority of which sought substantial modifications of the Guidances. We believe these Guidances, if implemented as written, could significantly reduce the supply of safe implantable human tissue without simultaneously reducing the risk of Mtb transmission sufficient to offset the harm to patients caused by reduced safe-tissue supply. Although some industry advocates and health care practitioners have expressed strong opposition to these new Guidances, and a number of them submitted comments regarding the Guidances during the recent comment period, if and how they may ultimately be implemented and enforced, and how they may actually impact the availability of our donated tissue, remains to be seen and is difficult to predict.
Previous wording
We have experienced, and expect to continue to be subject to the risk of, cybersecurity threats and incidents. For example, we experienced a previously-disclosed cyber-attack in the fourth quarter of 2024 that temporarily disrupted our business operations, including our ERP systems, and had an impact on revenue, manufacturing, order processing, shipping, and other corporate operations. Our claims for reimbursement with our insurer remain outstanding and we continue to incur expenses in connection with improving our global infrastructure and cybersecurity posture, additionally, we remain subject to other risks and uncertainties as a result of the incident, including those related to scrap, inventory levels, and timely shipping releases, as well as the potential to incur additional expenses.
Current wording
We have experienced, and expect to continue to be subject to the risk of, cybersecurity threats and incidents. For example, we experienced a previously-disclosed cybersecurity incident in the fourth quarter of 2024 that temporarily disrupted our business operations, including our ERP systems, and had an impact on revenue, manufacturing, order processing, shipping, and other corporate operations. Our claims for reimbursement with our insurer remain outstanding and we continue to incur expenses in connection with improving our global infrastructure and cybersecurity posture, additionally, we remain subject to other risks and uncertainties as a result of the incident, including those related to scrap, inventory levels, and timely shipping releases, as well as the potential to incur additional expenses.
Previous wording
The per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”) are used in a wide variety of consumer and industrial products, including medical devices and product packaging. PFAS have been subject to increasing regulations, and in some cases bans, by the Environmental Protection Agency and numerous states. These requirements impose a high compliance burden, and further regulation of PFAS-containing products is expected. Although we have yet to experience any material impact from this activity or identify any of our products materially impacted by PFAS-related regulation, the ultimate impact and associated cost of current and future rulemaking cannot be predicted at this time.
Current wording
The per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”) are used in a wide variety of consumer and industrial products, including medical devices and product packaging. PFAS have been subject to increasing global regulations, and in some cases bans, by the Environmental Protection Agency and numerous states. These requirements impose a high compliance burden, and further regulation of PFAS-containing products is expected. Although we have yet to experience any material impact from this activity or identify any of our products materially impacted by PFAS-related regulation, the ultimate impact and associated cost of current and future rulemaking cannot be predicted at this time.
Previous wording
The transition to a new presidential administration in the US brings several potential risks that could impact our business operations and financial performance. Changes in policy regarding international trade, including import and export regulation and international trade agreements, along with resulting volatility, could negatively impact our business. The US has imposed tariffs and export controls on certain goods and products imported from abroad, which has resulted in retaliatory tariffs. Additional tariffs imposed by the US on a broader range of imports, or further retaliatory trade measures taken by other countries in response, could result in an increase in supply chain costs that we may not be able to offset or that otherwise adversely impact our results of operations. In addition, political tensions between the US and certain other countries have escalated in recent years. Changes in foreign policy and the imposition of new sanctions could impact our ability to distribute products in certain regions. This could limit our market reach and affect our revenue streams. Changes in tax policy, including changes to corporate tax rates or changes in tax incentives that we currently benefit from, could also negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition.
Current wording
The transition to a new presidential administration in the US continues to bring several potential risks that could impact our business operations and financial performance. Changes in policy regarding international trade, including import and export regulation and international trade agreements, along with resulting volatility, could negatively impact our business. The US has imposed tariffs and export controls on certain goods and products imported from abroad, which has resulted in retaliatory tariffs. Additional tariffs imposed by the US on a broader range of imports, or further retaliatory trade measures taken by other countries in response, could result in an increase in supply chain costs that we may not be able to offset or that otherwise adversely impact our results of operations. In addition, political tensions between the US and certain other countries have escalated in recent years. Changes in foreign policy and the imposition of new sanctions could impact our ability to distribute products in certain regions. This could limit our market reach and affect our revenue streams. Changes in tax policy, including changes to corporate tax rates or changes in tax incentives that we currently benefit from, could also negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition.