Arbutus Biopharma Corp

Previous wording

You should read the following discussion and analysis by our management of our financial position and results of operations in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included as part of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 and our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles and are presented in U.S. dollars.

Current wording

You should read the following discussion and analysis by our management of our financial position and results of operations in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included as part of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 and our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2025. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles and are presented in U.S. dollars.

Previous wording

Throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Form 10-Q), the “Company,” “Arbutus,” “we,” “us,” and “our,” except where the context requires otherwise, refer to Arbutus Biopharma Corporation and its consolidated subsidiary, and “our Board of Directors” refers to the board of directors of Arbutus Biopharma Corporation.

Current wording

Throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Form 10-Q), the “Company,” “Arbutus,” “we,” “us,” and “our,” except where the context requires otherwise, refer to Arbutus Biopharma Corporation and its consolidated subsidiary.

Previous wording

•our strategy, future operations, preclinical studies, clinical trials, prospects and the plans of management;

Current wording

•our strategy, future operations, preclinical studies, clinical trials, and prospects;

Previous wording

•the expected returns and benefits from strategic alliances, licensing agreements, and research collaborations with third parties, and the timing thereof;

Current wording

•the expected returns and benefits from strategic alliances, licensing agreements, and development collaborations with third parties, and the timing thereof;

Previous wording

We continue to protect and defend our intellectual property, which is the subject of our ongoing lawsuits against Moderna Therapeutics, Inc. (Moderna) and Pfizer Inc. and BioNTech SE (collectively, Pfizer/BioNTech) for their use of our patented lipid nanoparticle (LNP) technology in their COVID-19 vaccines. With respect to the Moderna lawsuit, the claim construction hearing occurred on February 8, 2024. On April 3, 2024, the court provided its claim construction ruling in which it construed the disputed claim terms and agreed with our position on most of the disputed claim terms. On August 5, 2024, we and Genevant Sciences Ltd. (Genevant), along with Moderna, filed a Stipulation to Extend Time (the Stipulation) with the court that requested an amended case schedule to accommodate certain outstanding discovery from Moderna and third parties. The court approved the amended case schedule and the start of the trial was moved from April 21, 2025 to September 24, 2025, subject to the court’s availability. The lawsuit against Pfizer/BioNTech is ongoing and a date for a claim construction hearing has been scheduled for December 18, 2024.

Current wording

We continue to protect and defend our intellectual property, which is the subject of our ongoing lawsuits against Moderna Therapeutics, Inc. (Moderna) and against Pfizer Inc. and BioNTech SE (collectively, Pfizer/BioNTech) for their use of our patented lipid nanoparticle (LNP) delivery technology in their COVID-19 messenger ribonucleic acid interference (mRNA)-LNP vaccines. With respect to the Moderna lawsuit in the United States, a trial date has been set for September 29, 2025. With respect to the Pfizer/BioNTech lawsuit, the claim construction hearing occurred in December 2024. The court is expected to provide its ruling on the Pfizer/BioNTech lawsuit claim construction and issue a further scheduling order, including the date for trial, in 2025. On March 3, 2025, we announced that, along with Genevant Sciences Ltd. (Genevant), we have filed five international lawsuits against Moderna in connection with the use of our LNP technology in Moderna’s COVID-19 mRNA-LNP vaccines and, in the Unified Patent Court, also Moderna’s respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccines.

Previous wording

We believe that a combination of compounds that can suppress HBV DNA replication and HBsAg expression as well as boost patients’ HBV-specific immune response could address the most important elements to achieving a functional cure. Functional cure is defined as sustained HBsAg loss and HBV DNA less than the lower limit of quantification (<LLOQ) 24 weeks off treatment, with or without anti-HBsAg antibodies. We are developing imdusiran as a cornerstone in a combination therapy that also includes antivirals and immunologics. We believe that a combination therapy delivered over a finite treatment period that results in a significant increase in the functional cure rate (i.e., a cure rate of at least 20%) would be a meaningful advancement for patients with cHBV infection.

Current wording

Our current HBV strategy is to develop a functional cure for patients with cHBV infection with imdusiran as a potential cornerstone in a combination therapy. We believe that a combination of compounds that can suppress hepatitis B virus deoxyribonucleic acid (HBV DNA) replication and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) expression as well as boost patients’ HBV-specific immune response could address the most important elements to achieving a functional cure. Functional cure is defined as sustained HBsAg loss and HBV DNA less than the lower limit of quantification (<LLOQ) after 24 weeks off treatment, with or without anti-hepatitis B surface antibodies (anti-HBs). By providing a functional cure for patients with cHBV, we aim to prevent complications of disease progression, to decrease HBV burden by minimizing patient stigma and to address the need for finite and more efficacious HBV treatments that further improve long-term outcomes and reduce associated healthcare costs.

Previous wording

•Imdusiran is our proprietary, conjugated GalNAc, subcutaneously-delivered RNAi therapeutic product candidate that suppresses all HBV antigens, including HBsAg expression, which is thought to be a key prerequisite to enable reawakening of a patient’s immune system to respond to HBV. Over 250 patients with cHBV infection have been dosed with imdusiran in our Phase 1 and ongoing Phase 2a clinical trials. Clinical data generated thus far has shown imdusiran to be generally safe and well-tolerated, while also providing meaningful reductions in HBsAg and HBV DNA.

Current wording

•Imdusiran is our proprietary, GalNAc-conjugated, subcutaneously-delivered RNAi therapeutic product candidate that suppresses all HBV antigens, including HBsAg, which is thought to be a key prerequisite to enable reawakening of a patient’s immune system to respond to HBV. Over 250 patients with cHBV infection have been dosed with imdusiran in our Phase 1 and Phase 2a clinical trials. Clinical data generated thus far has shown imdusiran provides meaningful reductions in HBsAg and HBV DNA and leads to functional cure in some patients, while being generally safe and well-tolerated. To date, eight patients have reached functional cure, off all treatment, in combination therapy that includes imdusiran, including two patients who did not receive any pegylated interferon alfa-2a (IFN) as part of the combination therapy.

Previous wording

•AB-101 is our proprietary oral PD-L1 inhibitor that has the potential to reawaken patients’ HBV-specific immune response by inhibiting PD-L1. AB-101 is currently in a Phase 1a/1b clinical trial (AB-101-001) evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of single- and multiple-ascending oral doses in healthy subjects and patients with cHBV infection. Parts 1 and 2 of this clinical trial enrolled sequential cohorts of healthy subjects receiving single and multiple doses, respectively, of AB-101 at increasing dose levels. The data showed that AB-101 was generally well-tolerated with evidence of dose-dependent receptor occupancy. We have moved into Part 3 of this clinical trial which evaluates repeat dosing of AB-101 in patients with cHBV, and we expect to report preliminary data in the first half of 2025.

Current wording

•AB-101 is our proprietary oral PD-L1 inhibitor that has the potential to reawaken patients’ HBV-specific immune response by inhibiting PD-L1. AB-101 is currently in a Phase 1a/1b clinical trial (AB-101-001) evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of single- and multiple-ascending oral doses in healthy subjects and patients with cHBV infection. The data from healthy subjects in Parts 1 and 2 and cHBV patients to date in Part 3 of this clinical trial have showed that AB-101 was generally well-tolerated with evidence of high receptor occupancy.

Previous wording

Our strategy is to position imdusiran as a potential cornerstone therapeutic in combination with AB-101 or other agents with potentially complementary mechanisms of action. We are currently conducting two Phase 2a clinical trials combining imdusiran with other agents. The intent of these trials is to initially lower HBsAg levels with imdusiran and then administer a complementary agent, in this case an immune modulator or a therapeutic vaccine, to further lower HBsAg levels and promote anti-HBV immunity. We believe that if we can lower HBsAg and promote immunity, we may achieve sustained HBsAg loss and HBV DNA <LLOQ, potentially leading to a functional cure.

Current wording

To help position imdusiran as a potential cornerstone in a combination therapy, we fully enrolled two Phase 2a clinical trials that combined imdusiran with other agents. The intent of these trials was to initially lower HBsAg levels with imdusiran and then administer a complementary agent, an immune modulator or a therapeutic vaccine, to further lower HBsAg levels and promote anti-HBV immunity. We believe that if we can lower HBsAg and promote immunity, we may achieve sustained HBsAg loss and HBV DNA <LLOQ, potentially leading to a functional cure in many patients with cHBV.

Previous wording

Our imdusiran development program includes the following Phase 2a clinical trials:

Current wording

Our imdusiran development program includes the following two Phase 2a clinical trials:

Previous wording

We continue to explore expansion opportunities for our pipeline through development activities and potential strategic alliances.

Current wording

We continue to explore expansion opportunities for our pipeline through potential strategic alliances.

Previous wording

RNAi therapeutics represent a significant advancement in drug development. RNAi therapeutics utilize a natural pathway within cells to silence genes by eliminating the disease-causing proteins that they code for. We are developing an RNAi therapeutic that is designed to reduce HBsAg expression and other HBV antigens in people with cHBV infection. Reducing HBsAg is widely believed to be a key prerequisite to enable a patient’s immune system to reawaken and respond against the virus.

Current wording

RNAi therapeutics represent a significant advancement in drug development. RNAi therapeutics utilize a natural pathway within cells to effectively silence genes by eliminating the disease-causing proteins that they code for. We are developing an RNAi therapeutic, imdusiran (AB-729), that is designed to reduce HBsAg and other HBV antigen expression in people with cHBV infection. Reducing HBsAg is widely believed to be a key prerequisite to enable a patient’s immune system to reawaken and respond against the virus.

Previous wording

Imdusiran (AB-729) is a subcutaneously-delivered single-trigger RNAi therapeutic targeted to hepatocytes using our proprietary covalently conjugated GalNAc delivery technology. Imdusiran reduces all HBV antigens and inhibits viral replication.

Current wording

–Targeted to hepatocytes using our proprietary covalently conjugated GalNAc delivery technology which provides highly efficient liver-targeted uptake and enables subcutaneous dosing.

Previous wording

IM-PROVE I Phase 2a proof-of-concept clinical trial evaluating imdusiran in combination with Peg-IFNα-2a

Current wording

IM-PROVE I Phase 2a proof-of-concept clinical trial evaluating imdusiran in combination with IFN

Previous wording

We have completed enrollment in a randomized, open label, multicenter Phase 2a proof-of-concept clinical trial investigating the safety and antiviral activity of imdusiran in combination with a short course of Peg-IFNα-2a and ongoing NA therapy in 43 stably NA-suppressed, HBeAg negative, non-cirrhotic patients with cHBV infection. The primary objective of this trial is to initially lower HBsAg levels with imdusiran and then administer Peg-IFNα-2a as an immunomodulator to promote anti-HBV immune reawakening. We believe that if we can lower HBsAg and promote immune reawakening, we may achieve sustained HBsAg loss and HBV DNA <LLOQ, potentially leading to a functional cure. After 24-weeks of dosing with imdusiran (60mg every 8 weeks, 4 doses), patients were randomized into one of four arms to receive a short course of Peg-IFNα-2a plus ongoing NA therapy for either 12 or 24 weeks, with or without an additional two doses of imdusiran. After completion of the assigned Peg-IFNα-2a treatment period, all patients remained on NA therapy for the initial 24-week follow-up period, and then discontinued NA treatment, provided they met protocol-defined stopping criteria. Patients who stopped NA therapy entered an intensive follow-up period for 48 weeks.

Current wording

We have completed enrollment in IM-PROVE I, a randomized, open label, multicenter Phase 2a proof-of-concept clinical trial investigating the safety and antiviral activity of imdusiran in combination with a short course of IFN and ongoing NA therapy in 43 stably NA-suppressed, HBeAg negative, non-cirrhotic patients with cHBV infection. The primary objective of this trial was to initially lower HBsAg levels with imdusiran and then administer IFN as an immunomodulator to promote anti-HBV immune reawakening. We believe that if we can lower HBsAg and promote immune reawakening, we may achieve sustained HBsAg loss and HBV DNA <LLOQ, potentially leading to a functional cure. After 24-weeks of dosing with imdusiran (60mg every 8 weeks, 4 doses) plus ongoing NA therapy, patients were randomized into one of four cohorts to receive a short course of IFN plus ongoing NA therapy for either 12 or 24 weeks, with or without up to two additional doses of imdusiran. After completion of the assigned IFN treatment period, all patients remained on NA therapy for the initial 24-week follow-up period, and then discontinued NA treatment, provided they met protocol-defined stopping criteria. Patients who stopped NA therapy entered an intensive follow-up period for 48 weeks.

Previous wording

These data from the IM-PROVE I trial suggest that the combination of imdusiran and 24 weeks of Peg-IFNα-2a was generally safe and well-tolerated. There were no serious adverse events related to imdusiran or Peg-IFNα-2a, and no adverse events leading to discontinuation. The most common imdusiran-related treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were transient ALT elevations and injection site bruising. The Peg-IFNα-2a-related TEAEs were consistent with the known safety profile of Peg-IFNα-2a.

Current wording

These data from the IM-PROVE I trial suggest that the combination of imdusiran and 24 weeks of IFN was generally safe and well-tolerated. There were no serious adverse events related to imdusiran, IFN or NA therapy, and no adverse events leading to discontinuation. The most common imdusiran-related treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were transient alanine aminotransferase elevations and injection site bruising. The IFN-related TEAEs were consistent with the known safety profile of IFN.

Previous wording

Through a clinical collaboration agreement with Barinthus that we entered into in July 2021, we have completed enrollment in IM-PROVE II, a Phase 2a proof-of-concept clinical trial evaluating the safety, antiviral activity and immunogenicity of Barinthus’ VTP-300, an HBV antigen specific immunotherapy, administered after imdusiran in patients with cHBV infection. The initial trial design enrolled 40 NA-suppressed, HBeAg negative or positive, non-cirrhotic cHBV infected patients. The primary objective of this trial was to initially lower HBsAg levels with imdusiran and then administer VTP-300 as an immunomodulator to promote anti-HBV immune reawakening. We believe that if we can lower HBsAg and promote immune reawakening, we may achieve sustained HBsAg loss and HBV DNA <LLOQ, potentially leading to a functional cure. All patients received imdusiran (60mg every 8 weeks, 4 doses) plus NA therapy for 24 weeks. After week 24, treatment with imdusiran was stopped. Patients continued only on NA therapy and were randomized to receive VTP-300 or placebo at week 26 and week 30. At week 48, all patients were evaluated for eligibility to discontinue NA therapy and are followed for an additional 24 to 48 weeks.

Current wording

Through a clinical collaboration agreement with Barinthus that we entered into in July 2021, we have completed enrollment in IM-PROVE II, a Phase 2a proof-of-concept clinical trial evaluating the safety, antiviral activity and immunogenicity of a combination treatment with Barinthus’ VTP-300, an HBV immunotherapy, administered after imdusiran in patients with cHBV infection. The initial trial design enrolled 40 NA-suppressed, HBeAg negative or positive, non-cirrhotic cHBV infected patients. The primary objective of this trial was to initially lower HBsAg levels with imdusiran and then administer VTP-300 as an immunomodulator to promote anti-HBV immune reawakening. All patients received imdusiran (60mg every 8 weeks, 4 doses) plus NA therapy for 24 weeks. After week 24, treatment with imdusiran was stopped. Patients continued only on NA therapy and were randomized to receive VTP-300 or placebo at week 26 and week 30. At week 48, all patients were evaluated for eligibility to discontinue NA therapy and are being followed for an additional 24 to 48 weeks. Subsequently, we amended the IM-PROVE II clinical trial protocol to include another cohort that received imdusiran, VTP-300, NA therapy and low dose nivolumab (Opdivo®), an approved PD-1 inhibitor in oncology. In this additional cohort, patients received imdusiran (60mg every 8 weeks, 4 doses) plus NA therapy for 24 weeks, followed by administration of VTP-300 plus up to two low doses of nivolumab while remaining on NA therapy. At week 48, all patients were evaluated for eligibility to discontinue NA therapy, and are being followed for an additional 24 to 48 weeks.

Previous wording

The IM-PROVE II clinical trial is being managed by us, subject to oversight by a joint development committee comprised of representatives from both companies. We and Barinthus retain full rights to our respective product candidates and will split all costs associated with the clinical trial. Pursuant to the agreement, the parties may undertake a larger Phase 2b clinical trial depending on the results of the initial Phase 2a clinical trial.

Current wording

The IM-PROVE II clinical trial is being managed by us, subject to oversight by a joint development committee comprised of representatives from both companies. We and Barinthus retain full rights to our respective product candidates and are splitting all costs associated with the clinical trial. Pursuant to the agreement, the parties could have undertaken a larger Phase 2b clinical trial depending on the results of the initial Phase 2a clinical trial. However, in January 2025, Barinthus announced a shift in its strategic business focus that included postponing further development of VTP-300 after its ongoing VTP-300 clinical trials have concluded. The parties do not intend to undertake a larger Phase 2b with this combination treatment regimen.

Previous wording

PD-L1 inhibitors complement our pipeline of agents and could potentially be an important part of a combination therapy for the treatment of HBV by reawakening the immune system. Highly functional HBV-specific T-cells within our immune system are believed to be required for long-term HBV viral resolution. However, HBV-specific T-cells become functionally defective, and greatly reduced in their frequency during cHBV infection. One approach to boost HBV-specific T-cells is to prevent PD-L1 proteins from binding to PD-1 and thus inhibiting the HBV-specific immune function of T-cells. Immune checkpoints such as PD-1/PD-L1 play an important role in the induction and maintenance of immune tolerance and in T-cell activation.

Current wording

PD-L1 inhibitors complement our pipeline of agents and could potentially be an important part of a combination therapy for the treatment of HBV by reawakening the immune system. Highly functional HBV-specific T-cells within our immune system are believed to be required for long-term HBV viral resolution. However, HBV-specific T-cells become functionally defective, and greatly reduced in number during cHBV infection. One approach to boost HBV-specific T-cells is to prevent PD-L1 proteins from binding to PD-1, which would otherwise lead to inhibition of the HBV-specific immune function of T-cells.

Previous wording

AB-101 is our proprietary oral small-molecule PD-L1 inhibitor candidate that we believe will allow for controlled checkpoint blockade while minimizing the systemic safety issues typically seen with checkpoint inhibitor antibody therapies. AB-101 is differentiated from monoclonal antibody checkpoint inhibitors such as durvalumab (anti-PD-L1) and nivolumab (anti-PD-1) because it is liver centric, has a much shorter duration of effect which may provide dosing and safety advantages, and has a novel mechanism of action as it binds to PD-L1 on the surface of cells causing dimerization and internalization of the PD-L1 protein followed by degradation within hours.

Current wording

AB-101 is our proprietary oral small-molecule PD-L1 inhibitor candidate that we believe will allow for controlled checkpoint blockade while minimizing the systemic safety issues often seen with checkpoint inhibitor antibody therapies. AB-101 is differentiated from monoclonal antibody checkpoint inhibitors such as durvalumab (anti-PD-L1) and nivolumab (anti-PD-1) because it is liver centric, has a much shorter duration of effect in preclinical models (which may provide dosing and safety advantages), and has a novel mechanism of action as it binds to PD-L1 on the surface of cells causing dimerization, internalization and degradation of the PD-L1 protein.

Previous wording

We are currently dosing study subject in our Phase 1a/1b clinical trial for AB-101 (AB-101-001). The AB-101-001 clinical trial is designed to investigate the safety, tolerability and PK/PD of single and multiple-ascending oral doses of AB-101 for up to 28 days in healthy subjects and patients with cHBV infection. The trial consists of three parts starting with single ascending doses in healthy subjects, followed by multiple ascending doses in healthy subjects and culminating with multiple doses in patients with cHBV infection. Safety and PK/PD assessments are performed prior to dose escalation in all parts of the clinical trial.

Current wording

AB-101-001 is a Phase 1a/1b clinical trial designed to investigate the safety, tolerability and PK/PD of single and multiple-ascending oral doses of AB-101 for up to 28 days in healthy subjects and patients with cHBV infection. The trial consists of three parts starting with single ascending doses in healthy subjects, followed by multiple ascending doses in healthy subjects and culminating with multiple doses in patients with cHBV infection. Safety and PK/PD assessments are performed prior to dose escalation in all parts of the clinical trial.

Previous wording

Part 1 of this clinical trial enrolled four sequential cohorts of eight healthy subjects each (6 active: 2 placebo) receiving a single dose of AB-101 at increasing dose levels. The data showed that AB-101 was well-tolerated with evidence of dose-dependent receptor occupancy. In the 25mg cohort, all five evaluable subjects showed evidence of receptor occupancy between 50-100%.

Current wording

Part 1 of this clinical trial enrolled five sequential cohorts of eight healthy subjects each (6 active: 2 placebo) receiving a single dose of AB-101 at increasing dose levels. In Part 1, all five evaluable subjects in the 40mg cohort showed evidence of 100% receptor occupancy. Part 2 of this clinical trial enrolled three sequential cohorts of ten healthy subjects that each received 10, 25 or 40 mg of AB-101 (8 active: 2 placebo) daily for seven days. In Part 2, all subjects in the 40mg cohort showed evidence of high receptor occupancy between 74-100%, with six of the eight subjects demonstrating 100% receptor occupancy during the seven-day dosing period. Across Parts 1 and 2, eleven of the thirteen evaluable healthy subjects that received either single or multiple doses of 40mg of AB-101 achieved 100% receptor occupancy. The data from Part 1 and Part 2 showed that AB-101 was well-tolerated with evidence of high receptor occupancy.

Previous wording

We have moved into Part 3 of this clinical trial which evaluates repeat dosing of AB-101 for 28 days in patients with cHBV and we expect to report preliminary data in the first half of 2025.

Current wording

We have moved into Part 3 of this clinical trial which evaluates repeat doses of AB-101 for 28 days in patients with cHBV. At the EASL Congress in May 2025, we presented data showing that a single dose of 10 mg of AB-101 for 28 days in cHBV patients was well tolerated with PD-L1 receptor occupancy similar to that seen in healthy subjects at this dose. Treatment with AB-101 in Part 3 of this clinical trial was generally safe and well-tolerated. There were no serious adverse events or early discontinuations due to AB-101 and no evidence of liver dysfunction to date. Part 3 of this clinical trial is ongoing.

Previous wording

In December 2021, we entered into a technology transfer and license agreement (the License Agreement) with Qilu, pursuant to which we granted Qilu a sublicensable, royalty-bearing license, under certain intellectual property owned by us, which is non-exclusive as to development and manufacturing and exclusive with respect to commercialization of imdusiran, including pharmaceutical products that include imdusiran, for the treatment or prevention of hepatitis B in China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan (the Territory).

Current wording

In December 2021, we entered into a technology transfer and license agreement (the License Agreement) with Qilu, pursuant to which we granted Qilu a sublicensable, royalty-bearing license, under certain intellectual property owned by us, which is non-exclusive as to development and manufacturing and exclusive with respect to commercialization of imdusiran, including pharmaceutical products that include imdusiran, for the treatment or prevention of hepatitis B in China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan (Greater China and Taiwan).

Previous wording

In partial consideration for the rights granted by us, Qilu paid us a one-time upfront cash payment of $40 million on January 5, 2022 and agreed to pay us milestone payments totaling up to $245 million, net of withholding taxes, upon the achievement of certain technology transfer, development, regulatory and commercialization milestones. Qilu also agreed to pay us double-digit royalties into the low twenties percent based upon annual net sales of imdusiran in the Territory. The royalties are payable on a product-by-product and region-by-region basis, subject to certain limitations.

Current wording

In partial consideration for the rights granted by us, Qilu paid us a one-time upfront cash payment of $40 million on January 5, 2022 and agreed to pay us up to $245 million, net of withholding taxes, upon the achievement of certain technology transfer, development, regulatory and commercialization milestones. Qilu also agreed to pay us double-digit royalties into the low twenties percent based upon annual net sales of imdusiran in Greater China and Taiwan. The royalties are payable on a product-by-product and region-by-region basis, subject to certain limitations.

Previous wording

Qilu is responsible for all costs related to developing, obtaining regulatory approval for, and commercializing imdusiran for the treatment or prevention of hepatitis B in the Territory. Qilu is required to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop, seek regulatory approval for, and commercialize at least one imdusiran product candidate in the Territory. A joint development committee has been established between us and Qilu to coordinate and review the development, manufacturing and commercialization plans. Both parties also have entered into a supply agreement and related quality agreement pursuant to which we will manufacture or have manufactured and supply Qilu with all quantities of imdusiran necessary for Qilu to develop and commercialize in the Territory until we have completed manufacturing technology transfer to Qilu and Qilu has received all approvals required for it or its designated contract manufacturing organization to manufacture imdusiran in the Territory.

Current wording

Qilu is responsible for all costs related to developing, obtaining regulatory approval for, and commercializing imdusiran for the treatment or prevention of hepatitis B in Greater China and Taiwan. Qilu is required to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop, seek regulatory approval for, and commercialize at least one imdusiran product candidate in Greater China and Taiwan. A joint development committee has been established between us and Qilu to coordinate and review the development, manufacturing and commercialization plans. Both parties also have entered into a supply agreement and related quality agreement pursuant to which we will manufacture or have manufactured and supply Qilu with all quantities of imdusiran necessary for Qilu to develop and commercialize in Greater China and Taiwan until we have completed manufacturing technology transfer to Qilu and Qilu has received all approvals required for it or its designated contract manufacturing organization to manufacture imdusiran in Greater China and Taiwan.

Previous wording

In 2012, we entered into a license agreement with Alnylam that entitles Alnylam to develop and commercialize products with our LNP delivery technology. Alnylam’s ONPATTRO, which represents the first approved application of our LNP technology, was approved by the FDA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) during the third quarter of 2018 and was launched by Alnylam immediately upon approval in the United States. Under the terms of this license agreement, we are entitled to tiered royalty payments on global net sales of ONPATTRO ranging from 1.00% - 2.33% after offsets, with the highest tier applicable to annual net sales above $500 million. This royalty interest was sold to the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS), effective as of January 1, 2019, for $20 million in gross proceeds before advisory fees. OMERS will retain this entitlement until it has received $30 million in royalties, at which point 100% of this royalty entitlement on future global net sales of ONPATTRO will revert to us. OMERS has assumed the risk of collecting up to $30 million of future royalty payments from Alnylam and we are not obligated to reimburse OMERS if they fail to collect any such future royalties. If this royalty entitlement reverts to us, it has the potential to provide an active royalty stream or to be otherwise monetized again in full or in part. From the inception of the royalty sale through September 30, 2024, an aggregate of $24.4 million of royalties have been earned by OMERS.

Current wording

In 2012, we entered into a license agreement with Alnylam that entitles Alnylam to develop and commercialize products with our LNP delivery technology. Alnylam’s ONPATTRO, which represents the first approved application of our LNP technology, was approved by the FDA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) during the third quarter of 2018 and was launched by Alnylam immediately upon approval in the United States. Under the terms of this license agreement, we are entitled to tiered royalty payments on global net sales of ONPATTRO ranging from 1.00% - 2.33% after offsets, with the highest tier applicable to annual net sales above $500 million. This royalty interest was sold to the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS), effective as of January 1, 2019, for $20 million in gross proceeds before advisory fees. OMERS will retain this entitlement until it has received $30 million in royalties, at which point 100% of this royalty entitlement on future global net sales of ONPATTRO will revert to us. OMERS has assumed the risk of collecting up to $30 million of future royalty payments from Alnylam and we are not obligated to reimburse OMERS if it fails to collect any such future royalties. If this royalty entitlement reverts to us, it has the potential to provide an active royalty stream or to be otherwise monetized again in full or in part. From the inception of the royalty sale through March 31, 2025, an aggregate of $25.3 million of royalties have been earned by OMERS.

Previous wording

In April 2018, we entered into an agreement with Roivant Sciences Ltd. (Roivant), our largest shareholder, to launch Genevant, a company focused on a broad range of RNA-based therapeutics enabled by our LNP and ligand conjugate delivery technologies. We licensed rights to our LNP and ligand conjugate delivery platforms to Genevant for RNA-based applications outside of HBV, except to the extent certain rights had already been licensed to other third parties (the Genevant License). We retained all rights to our LNP and conjugate delivery platforms for HBV.

Current wording

In April 2018, we entered into an agreement with Roivant Sciences Ltd. (Roivant), our largest shareholder, to launch Genevant, a company focused on nucleic acid- and gene editing-based therapeutics enabled by our LNP and ligand conjugate delivery technologies. We licensed rights to our LNP and ligand conjugate delivery platforms to Genevant outside of HBV, except to the extent certain rights had already been licensed to other third parties (the Genevant License). We retained all rights to our LNP and conjugate delivery platforms for HBV.

Previous wording

In July 2020, Roivant recapitalized Genevant through an equity investment and conversion of previously issued convertible debt securities held by Roivant. We participated in the recapitalization of Genevant with an equity investment of $2.5 million. In connection with the recapitalization, the three parties entered into an Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement that provides Roivant with substantial control of Genevant. We have a non-voting observer seat on Genevant’s Board of Directors.

Current wording

In July 2020, Roivant recapitalized Genevant through an equity investment and conversion of previously issued convertible debt securities held by Roivant. We participated in the recapitalization of Genevant with an equity investment of $2.5 million. In connection with the recapitalization, the three parties entered into an Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement that provides Roivant with substantial control of Genevant. We have the right to have a non-voting observer attend meetings of Genevant’s Board of Directors.

Previous wording

On February 28, 2022, we and Genevant filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware against Moderna, Inc. and a Moderna affiliate (collectively, Moderna) seeking damages for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,058,069, 8,492,359, 8,822,668, 9,364,435, 9,504,651, and 11,141,378 in the manufacture and sale of MRNA-1273, Moderna’s vaccine for COVID-19. The patents relate to nucleic acid-lipid particles and lipid vesicles, as well as compositions and methods for their use. The lawsuit does not seek an injunction or otherwise seek to impede the sale, manufacture or distribution of MRNA-1273. However, we seek fair compensation for Moderna’s use of our patented technology that was developed with great effort and at great expense, without which Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine would not have been successful. On May 6, 2022, Moderna filed a partial motion to dismiss the claims “relating to Moderna’s sale and provision of COVID-19 vaccine doses to the U.S. Government.” On November 2, 2022, the court issued an Order denying Moderna’s motion. On November 30, 2022, Moderna filed its Answer to the Complaint and Counterclaims. We and Genevant filed our Answer to Moderna’s Counterclaims on December 21, 2022. On February 14, 2023, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a Statement of Interest in the action. On February 16, 2023, the court held an Initial Pretrial Conference after which it issued an Order, dated February 16, 2023, ordering that within 14 days of the issuance of the Order, the parties and the U.S. Government were to submit letters regarding the impact of the Governments’ Statement of Interest on the scheduling of the matter. On March 10, 2023, the court reaffirmed its denial of Moderna’s motion to dismiss. On March 16, 2023, the court held a Rule 16 scheduling conference, and on March 21, 2023, the court issued a scheduling order in the matter without setting a trial date. On June 9, 2023, the court granted the parties’ request to extend the time for claim construction briefing. The claim construction hearing was held on February 8, 2024. On April 3, 2024, the court issued its opinion regarding the claims construction. The court agreed with both of our positions regarding the Composition of Total Lipid (‘069) Patent that: (i) the claimed molar percentage (mol. %) ranges can be met by any particle and is not limited to “finished” particles that are not subjected to further process steps; and (ii) that the claimed mol. % ranges include standard variation based on the number of significant figures recited in the claim. The court also agreed with our position regarding the Cationic Lipid with Protonatable Tertiary Amine (‘378) Patent that there is no limitation as to the mol. % of the claimed cationic lipid. Regarding the Encapsulation of mRNA (‘651) Patent, the court held that “wherein at least 70% / at least 80% / about 90% of the mRNA in the formulation is fully encapsulated in the lipid vesicles” means “wherein at least 70% / at le…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Current wording

On February 28, 2022, we and Genevant filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware against Moderna, Inc. and a Moderna affiliate (collectively, Moderna) seeking damages for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,058,069, 8,492,359, 8,822,668, 9,364,435, 9,504,651, and 11,141,378 in the manufacture and sale of MRNA-1273, Moderna’s vaccine for COVID-19. The patents relate to nucleic acid-lipid particles and lipid vesicles, as well as compositions and methods for their use. The lawsuit does not seek an injunction or otherwise seek to impede the sale, manufacture or distribution of MRNA-1273. However, we seek fair compensation for Moderna’s use of our patented technology that was developed with great effort and at great expense, without which Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine would not have been successful. On May 6, 2022, Moderna filed a partial motion to dismiss the claims “relating to Moderna’s sale and provision of COVID-19 vaccine doses to the U.S. Government.” On November 2, 2022, the court issued an Order denying Moderna’s motion. On February 14, 2023, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a Statement of Interest in the action. On February 16, 2023, the court held an Initial Pretrial Conference after which it issued an Order directing the parties and the U.S. Government to submit letters regarding the impact of the Government’s Statement of Interest. On March 10, 2023, the court reaffirmed its denial of Moderna’s motion to dismiss. The claim construction hearing was held on February 8, 2024. On April 3, 2024, the court issued its opinion regarding the claims construction. The court agreed with both of our positions regarding the Composition of Total Lipid (’069) Patent that: (i) the claimed molar percentage (mol. %) ranges can be met by any particle and is not limited to “finished” particles that are not subjected to further process steps; and (ii) that the claimed mol. % ranges include standard variation based on the number of significant figures recited in the claim. The court also agreed with our position regarding the Cationic Lipid with Protonatable Tertiary Amine (’378) Patent that there is no limitation as to the mol. % of the claimed cationic lipid. Regarding the Encapsulation of mRNA (’651) Patent, the court held that “wherein at least 70% / at least 80% / about 90% of the mRNA in the formulation is fully encapsulated in the lipid vesicles” means “wherein at least 70% / at least 80% / about 90% of the mRNA is fully, as distinct from partially, contained inside the lipid vesicles”. Trial is currently scheduled for September 29, 2025. Expert discovery has concluded and the case is entering the summary judgement stage.

Previous wording

On April 4, 2023, we and Genevant filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey against Pfizer Inc. (Pfizer) and BioNTech SE (BioNTech) seeking damages for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,504,651; 8,492,359; 11,141,378; 11,298,320; and 11,318,098 in the manufacture and sale of any COVID-19 mRNA-LNP vaccines. The patents relate to nucleic acid-lipid particles and their composition, manufacture, delivery and methods of use. The lawsuit does not seek an injunction or otherwise seek to impede the sale, manufacture or distribution of any COVID-19 mRNA-LNP vaccines. However, we seek fair compensation for Pfizer’s and BioNTech’s use of our patented technology that was developed with great effort and at great expense, without which their COVID-19 mRNA-LNP vaccines would not have been successful. On July 10, 2023, Pfizer and BioNTech filed their answer to the complaint, affirmative defenses and counterclaims. We and Genevant filed our answer to these counterclaims on August 14, 2023. A scheduling conference was held on August 28, 2023 and the court issued a Letter Order on September 7, 2023 setting certain court dates. Subsequently, the claim construction hearing was scheduled for December 18, 2024. Scheduling of subsequent case dates, including the date for trial, will be set at a later time that is yet to be determined. Document and written discovery in the action is ongoing.

Current wording

On April 4, 2023, we and Genevant filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey against Pfizer Inc. (Pfizer) and BioNTech SE (BioNTech) seeking damages for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,504,651; 8,492,359; 11,141,378; 11,298,320; and 11,318,098 in the manufacture and sale of any COVID-19 mRNA-LNP vaccines. The patents relate to nucleic acid-lipid particles and their composition, manufacture, delivery and methods of use. The lawsuit does not seek an injunction or otherwise seek to impede the sale, manufacture or distribution of any COVID-19 mRNA-LNP vaccines. However, we seek fair compensation for Pfizer’s and BioNTech’s use of our patented technology that was developed with great effort and at great expense, without which their COVID-19 mRNA-LNP vaccines would not have been successful. The claim construction hearing occurred in December 2024. The court is expected to provide its ruling on the claim construction and issue a further scheduling order, including the date for trial, in 2025. Fact discovery in the action is ongoing.

Previous wording

On April 5, 2018, Moderna and Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corporation (Merck) filed Notices of Opposition to Arbutus’ European patent EP 2279254 (the ’254 Patent) with the European Patent Office (EPO), requesting that the ‘254 Patent be revoked in its entirety for all contracting states. We filed a response to Moderna and Merck’s oppositions on September 3, 2018. A hearing was conducted before the Opposition Division of the EPO on October 10, 2019. At the conclusion of the hearing, the EPO upheld an auxiliary request adopting the amendment, as put forth by us, of certain claims of the ‘254 Patent. In February 2020 Moderna and Merck filed Notices of Appeal challenging the EPO’s grant of the auxiliary request. Merck filed its notice of appeal on February 24, 2020 and Moderna on February 27, 2020. Both Merck and Moderna perfected their appeals by filing Grounds of Appeal on April 30, 2020. We filed our responses to the appeals on September 18, 2020. On March 22, 2022, Moderna filed further written submissions to which we and Genevant responded in August 2022. On April 18, 2023, we and Genevant withdrew our auxiliary request, however, the original (main) request remains in the action. We and Moderna informed the Board of Appeals that we would not object to a remittance of the matter without a hearing to the Opposition Division of the EPO. The hearing in this matter before the Board of Appeals was subsequently cancelled and resubmitted to the Opposition Division (i.e., lower board) of the EPO. On October 31, 2023, the Opposition Division issued a summons for oral proceedings and provided its preliminary and non-binding opinion on the subject matter to be discussed at the hearing. On November 3, 2023, we responded to the summons and on January 15, 2024, Moderna and Merck filed their reply to the written opinion of the Opposition Division, as well as to our written submission of November 3, 2023. We responded to Moderna and Merck’s reply on April 5, 2024. Oral proceedings were held on June 6, 2024, and the Opposition Division upheld the ‘254 Patent but declined our and Genevant’s request to broaden certain claims in the ‘254 Patent. Both parties have given notice of their intent to appeal the Opposition Division’s decision, and the deadline for filing for their respective grounds for appeal is November 25, 2024.

Current wording

On April 5, 2018, Moderna and Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corporation (Merck) filed Notices of Opposition to Arbutus’ European patent EP 2279254 (the ’254 Patent) with the European Patent Office (EPO), requesting that the ’254 Patent be revoked in its entirety for all contracting states. We filed a response to Moderna and Merck’s oppositions on September 3, 2018. A hearing was conducted before the Opposition Division of the EPO on October 10, 2019. At the conclusion of the hearing, the EPO upheld an auxiliary request adopting the amendment, as put forth by us, of certain claims of the ’254 Patent. In February 2020 Moderna and Merck filed Notices of Appeal challenging the EPO’s grant of the auxiliary request. Merck filed its notice of appeal on February 24, 2020 and Moderna on February 27, 2020. Both Merck and Moderna perfected their appeals by filing Grounds of Appeal on April 30, 2020. We filed our responses to the appeals on September 18, 2020. On March 22, 2022, Moderna filed further written submissions to which we and Genevant responded in August 2022. On April 18, 2023, we and Genevant withdrew our auxiliary request, however, the original (main) request remains in the action. We and Moderna informed the Board of Appeals that we would not object to a remittance of the matter without a hearing to the Opposition Division of the EPO. The hearing in this matter before the Board of Appeals was subsequently cancelled and resubmitted to the Opposition Division (i.e., lower board) of the EPO. On October 31, 2023, the Opposition Division issued a summons for oral proceedings and provided its preliminary and non-binding opinion on the subject matter to be discussed at the hearing. On November 3, 2023, we responded to the summons and on January 15, 2024, Moderna and Merck filed their reply to the written opinion of the Opposition Division, as well as to our written submission of November 3, 2023. We responded to Moderna and

Previous wording

While we are the patent holder, the ‘127 Patent, the ‘254 Patent, the other patents in our LNP portfolio have been licensed to Genevant and are included in the rights licensed by us to Genevant under the Genevant License.

Current wording

While we are the patent owner, the ’254 Patent, the ’767 Patent, and the other patents in our LNP portfolio have been licensed to Genevant under the Genevant License.

Previous wording

Total revenue decreased $3.3 million and $11.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2023, due primarily to: i) a decrease in license revenue recognized related to our progress towards the satisfaction of our performance obligations with respect to the technology transfer and licensing agreement with Qilu; and ii) a decrease in license royalty revenue from Alnylam and Acuitas due to lower sales of ONPATTRO in 2024 compared to 2023.

Current wording

Total revenue increased $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024, due primarily to an increase in license revenue recognized related to our progress towards the satisfaction of our performance obligations with respect to the technology transfer and licensing agreement with Qilu, partially offset by a decrease in license royalty revenue from Alnylam and Acuitas due to lower sales of ONPATTRO in the 2025 period compared to the 2024 period.

Previous wording

Research and development expenses decreased $5.9 million and $10.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2023. The decreases were due primarily to the discontinuation of our coronavirus and AB-161 programs in September 2023, along with related headcount reductions, as part of our efforts to focus our pipeline on our lead HBV product candidates. In connection with our cessation of all discovery efforts in August 2024, we expect our research expenses to continue to be reduced in future periods.

Current wording

Research and development expenses decreased $6.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to the same period in 2024. The decrease was due primarily to our decision in the third quarter of 2024 to cease all discovery efforts, discontinue our IM-PROVE III clinical trial and implement a 40% reduction in our workforce to streamline the organization to focus our efforts on advancing the clinical development of imdusiran and AB-101. In connection with our cessation of all discovery efforts in August 2024 and an additional 57% reduction in our workforce in the first quarter of 2025, we expect our research expenses to continue to be reduced in future periods.

Previous wording

General and administrative expenses decreased $1.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2024, as compared to the same period in 2023, due primarily to decreased employee compensation-related expenses associated with a reduction in headcount in connection with the prioritization of our HBV pipeline in September 2023. Total general and administrative expenses remained substantially similar for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 compared to the same period in 2023, with higher litigation-related legal fees offset by a reduction in employee compensation-related expenses and insurance premiums.

Current wording

General and administrative expenses increased $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, as compared to the same period in 2024, due primarily to an increase in litigation-related legal fees, partially offset by a decrease in employee compensation-related expenses.

Previous wording

Contingent consideration is a liability related to our acquisition of Enantigen Therapeutics, Inc. in October 2014. In general, as time passes and assuming no changes to the assumptions related to the contingency, the fair value of the contingent consideration increases as the progress of our programs get closer to triggering contingent payments based on certain sales milestones of our first commercial product for cHBV. As imdusiran continues to progress through Phase 2a proof-of-concept clinical trials, we will adjust our assumptions regarding probability of success commensurate with the progression of the program, which will increase the fair value of the liability.

Current wording

Contingent consideration is a liability related to our acquisition of Enantigen Therapeutics, Inc. in October 2014. In general, as time passes and assuming no changes to the assumptions related to the contingency, the fair value of the contingent consideration increases as the progress of our programs get closer to triggering contingent payments based on certain sales milestones of our first commercial product for cHBV. As imdusiran continues to progress through clinical trials, we will adjust our assumptions regarding probability of success commensurate with the progression of the program, which will increase the fair value of the liability.

Previous wording

The increase in interest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 compared to the same periods in 2023 was due primarily to higher interest earned on our cash and investment balances due to a general increase in market interest rates. We anticipate a decrease in interest income in immediate future periods due to lower interest earned on our cash and investment balances due to a general decrease in market interest rates.

Current wording

The decrease in interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024 was due primarily to less interest earned on our cash and investment balances due to a lower average balance and a general decrease in market interest rates.

Previous wording

Interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 and 2023 consisted primarily of non-cash amortization of discount and issuance costs related to the sale of a portion of our ONPATTRO royalty interest to OMERS in July 2019. The decrease is related to the declining balance of the unamortized discount and issuance costs.

Current wording

Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 consisted primarily of non-cash amortization of discount and issuance costs related to the sale of a portion of our ONPATTRO royalty interest to OMERS in July 2019. The decrease is related to the declining balance of the unamortized discount and issuance costs.

Previous wording

For the nine months ended September 30, 2024, net cash provided by investing activities was $9.5 million, resulting primarily from maturities of investments in marketable securities of $108.0 million, partially offset by additional investments in marketable securities of $98.3 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2023, net cash provided by investing activities was $28.5 million, which resulted primarily from maturities of investments in marketable securities of $86.0 million, partially offset by additional investments in marketable securities of $56.5 million.

Current wording

For the three months ended March 31, 2025, net cash provided by investing activities was $11.3 million, resulting primarily from maturities of investments in marketable securities of $46.1 million, partially offset by additional investments in marketable securities of $34.7 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2024, net cash provided by investing activities was $11.7 million, which resulted primarily from maturities of investments in marketable securities of $37.2 million, partially offset by additional investments in marketable securities of $25.4 million.