Skip to main content

CAPRICOR THERAPEUTICS, INC.

For the period ended Sep 30, 2026. Filed Nov 10, 2026.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.

Sep 30, 2026 · Filed Nov 10, 2026

CAPR$8.87-9.9%Stored close · as of Nov 10, 2026

What changed in Risk Factors?

Read the current filing

Previous report: 10-Q

Period ended 2026-06-30; filed 2026-08-14.

0001104659-26-097294

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Current report: 10-Q

Period ended 2026-09-30; filed 2026-11-10.

0001104659-26-125355

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 27 previous paragraphs and 31 current paragraphs.

18 unchanged; 8 reworded; 5 added; 0 removed; 1 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 43 previous and 43 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

Added paragraphs (5)

Current report

In the arbitration, Capricor counterclaimed for breach of contract (repudiation and failure to perform), breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, rescission based on mutual mistake, declaration of Capricor's right to distribute Deramiocel, and unjust enrichment, reserving claims for unilateral mistake and frustration of purpose. Capricor seeks damages for NS's breaches and repudiation, declaratory and injunctive relief holding that the Distribution Agreement

Current report

has been repudiated and/or is rescinded such that Capricor is entitled to distribute, or hire another company to distribute, Deramiocel, and in the alternative Capricor seeks restitution for unjust enrichment.

Current report

We are building commercial capabilities and a corporate compliance program in preparation for the potential launch of Deramiocel, and we may be unable to do so effectively, on a timely basis or at all.

Current report

In preparation for the potential approval of Deramiocel, we are building sales, marketing, market access and patient support capabilities, together with a corporate compliance program designed to address the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the federal civil False Claims Act, the Physician Payments Sunshine Act and analogous state laws that govern the commercial activities of biopharmaceutical companies. We have not previously conducted these activities, and the scope, timing and cost of this effort remain uncertain. Our BLA for Deramiocel remains under FDA review, with a PDUFA target action date of November 22, 2026. In addition, whether we commercialize Deramiocel in the United States directly or through NS or another distributor will depend on the outcome of our arbitration with NS. As a result, we may incur commercial and compliance expenses prematurely or unnecessarily, or we may be unable to complete these capabilities in time to support a timely launch. Although effective compliance programs can mitigate the risk of investigation and

Current report

prosecution for violations of healthcare laws, these risks cannot be entirely eliminated. Our compliance program may not prevent our employees, consultants, contractors or distribution partners from engaging in misconduct. Any of these outcomes could materially adversely affect our business.
Reworded paragraphs (8)

Previous wording

Part 1, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, as filed with the SEC on March 17, 2026, describes important risk factors that could cause our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects to differ significantly from those suggested by forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or otherwise presented by us from time to time. Other than the addition of, and modifications to the risk factors listed below, there have been no material changes from the risk factors previously described under Part I, Item 1A of the Form 10-K and under Part II, Item 1A of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2026.

Current wording

Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, as filed with the SEC on March 17, 2026, describes important risk factors that could cause our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects to differ significantly from those suggested by forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or otherwise presented by us from time to time. Other than the addition of, and modifications to, the risk factors listed below, there have been no material changes from the risk factors previously described under Part I, Item 1A of the Form 10-K and under Part II, Item 1A of our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2026 and June 30, 2026.

Previous wording

On July 29, 2026, the FDA convened an Advisory Committee to review our BLA for Deramiocel. The single voting question presented to the Advisory Committee asked whether the available evidence supports the effectiveness of Deramiocel for the treatment of cardiomyopathy in patients with DMD. The Advisory Committee voted 3 in favor and 9 against, with no abstentions. The voting question addressed a narrower indication than we had proposed and did not include a vote on the HOPE-3 primary endpoint of upper limb function or on the overall benefit-risk profile of Deramiocel. At this time, we plan to submit an amendment to our BLA, which the FDA has indicated it is willing to review; however, we do not know how long it will take for the FDA to make a decision on our BLA. The FDA may give us a complete response letter (rejecting our amended BLA) or further delay approval of our amended BLA if applicable regulatory criteria are not satisfied and/or the FDA requires additional testing or information.

Current wording

On July 29, 2026, the FDA convened the Ad-Com Committee to review our BLA for Deramiocel. The single voting question presented to the Ad-Com Committee asked whether the available evidence supports the effectiveness of Deramiocel for the treatment of cardiomyopathy in patients with DMD. The Ad-Com Committee voted 3 in favor and 9 against, with no abstentions. The voting question addressed a narrower indication than we had proposed and did not include a vote on the HOPE-3 primary endpoint of upper limb function or on the overall benefit-risk profile of Deramiocel. With the approval of the FDA, we submitted an amendment to our BLA, which the FDA has indicated it is willing to review; however, we do not know how long it will take for the FDA to make a decision on our BLA. The FDA may give us a CRL (rejecting our amended BLA) or further delay approval of our amended BLA if applicable regulatory criteria are not satisfied and/or the FDA requires additional testing or information. The FDA also extended the PDUFA target action date to November 22, 2026.

Previous wording

We may not be successful in our newly filed litigation against NS, and the litigation could result in substantial costs, diversion of resources and harm to our business.

Current wording

We may not be successful in our dispute with NS, and the dispute could result in substantial costs, diversion of resources and harm to our business.

Previous wording

We have filed a Complaint for Equitable Relief and Application for Preliminary Injunction (the “Complaint”) in the Superior Court of New Jersey. The Complaint alleges that the defendants named therein, NS, have failed to adequately prepare for the commercial launch of the Company’s product Deramiocel in the United States pursuant to the Commercialization and Distribution Agreement dated January 25, 2022, between the Company and NS (the “U.S. Distribution Agreement”), and have otherwise materially breached the terms of the U.S. Distribution Agreement. In the Complaint, the Company seeks rescission of the U.S. Distribution Agreement, declaratory judgment that the Company has the right to distribute Deramiocel directly or through distributors other than NS, and other equitable remedies. Capricor withdrew the motion, without prejudice, having determined that resolving this contractual dispute in arbitration following the FDA's decision would give the parties a more complete regulatory record to work from. The Company estimates arbitration to begin this fall.

Current wording

We filed the Complaint in the Superior Court of New Jersey. The Complaint alleges that the defendants named therein, NS, failed to adequately prepare for the commercial launch of the Company’s product Deramiocel in the United States pursuant to the U.S. Distribution Agreement, and have otherwise materially breached the terms of the U.S. Distribution Agreement. In the Complaint, the Company sought rescission of the U.S. Distribution Agreement, declaratory judgment that the Company has the right to distribute Deramiocel directly or through distributors other than NS, and other equitable remedies. Capricor subsequently withdrew its application for a preliminary injunction, without prejudice, having determined that resolving this contractual dispute in arbitration following the FDA’s decision would give the parties a more complete regulatory record to work from. In the arbitration, NS filed a complaint for Breach of Contract against Capricor and demands declaratory and injunctive relief holding that Capricor breached the Distribution Agreement, that the Distribution Agreement remains in full force and effect, and requiring Capricor to perform its obligations thereunder. Capricor filed counterclaims as follows:

Previous wording

It is difficult to predict the outcome of any dispute, and there can be no assurance that we will prevail in this matter or obtain the remedies we seek. The arbitration process may continue for an extended period of time, may be expensive and time-consuming, and may divert the attention and resources of management and other personnel away from our business operations and strategic objectives. In addition, NS has asserted counterclaims against us. An adverse outcome in the arbitration or in any counterclaims could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Current wording

It is difficult to predict the outcome of any dispute, and there can be no assurance that we will prevail in this matter or obtain the remedies we seek. The arbitration process may continue for an extended period of time, may be expensive and time-consuming, and may divert the attention and resources of management and other personnel away from our business operations and strategic objectives. An adverse outcome in the arbitration or in any counterclaims could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Previous wording

We have a history of net losses, expect to continue to incur substantial net losses for the foreseeable future, and may never achieve or maintain profitability. Our operations to date have been primarily limited to organizing and staffing our company, developing our technology, and undertaking preclinical studies and clinical trials of our product candidates. We have not yet obtained regulatory approval for any of our product candidates. Specifically, our financial condition and operating results have varied significantly in the past and will continue to fluctuate from quarter-to-quarter and year-to-year in the future due to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. In particular, our expenditures on the commercialization of Deramiocel, if approved, will heavily depend on the outcome of our litigation with NS and, if we are successful in such litigation, whether we commercialize Deramiocel in the United States directly or through one or more distributors. Other factors relating to our business that may contribute to these fluctuations include the following factors:

Current wording

We have a history of net losses, expect to continue to incur substantial net losses for the foreseeable future, and may never achieve or maintain profitability. Our operations to date have been primarily limited to organizing and staffing our company, developing our technology, undertaking preclinical studies and clinical trials of our product candidates, and developing and expanding our manufacturing capabilities for our product candidates. We have not yet obtained regulatory approval for any of our product candidates. Specifically, our financial condition and operating results have varied significantly in the past and will continue to fluctuate from quarter-to-quarter and year-to-year in the future due to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. In particular, our expenditures on the commercialization of Deramiocel, if approved, will heavily depend on the outcome of our dispute with NS and, if we are successful in such dispute, whether we commercialize Deramiocel in the United States directly or through one or more distributors. Other factors relating to our business that may contribute to these fluctuations include the following factors:

Previous wording

We currently have no FDA approved products and so do not have experience in the commercialization, marketing, sale or distribution of pharmaceutical products on a commercial scale. As a result, even if we are successful in our litigation against NS, we may encounter significant difficulties or delays in successfully launching and commercializing any product candidates for which we obtain regulatory approval.

Current wording

We currently have no FDA approved products and so do not have experience in the commercialization, marketing, sale or distribution of pharmaceutical products on a commercial scale. As a result, even if we are successful in our dispute with NS, we may encounter significant difficulties or delays in successfully launching and commercializing any product candidates for which we obtain regulatory approval.

Previous wording

We are actively looking into potential additional strategic partnerships for our product candidates, particularly for Deramiocel in additional territories outside the United States and Japan, and for our exosomes product candidates. To the extent that we are successful in our dispute against NS, we may also explore strategic partnerships for the commercialization of Deramiocel in the United States. If we do not establish strategic partnerships, we potentially will have to undertake development and commercialization efforts with respect to our product candidates on our own, which would be costly and adversely impact our ability to commercialize any future products or product candidates. If we enter

Current wording

We are actively looking into potential additional strategic partnerships for our product candidates, particularly for Deramiocel in the United States and additional territories outside the United States and Japan, and for our exosomes product candidates. To the extent that we are successful in our dispute against NS, we may also explore strategic partnerships for the commercialization of Deramiocel in the United States. If we do not establish strategic partnerships, we potentially will have to undertake development and commercialization efforts with respect to our product candidates on our own, which would be costly and adversely impact our ability to commercialize any future products or product candidates. If we enter into any strategic partnerships with pharmaceutical, biotechnology or other life science companies, we will be subject to a number of risks, including:
Rearranged previous paragraphs (1)

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

into any strategic partnerships with pharmaceutical, biotechnology or other life science companies, we will be subject to a number of risks, including: