UNITED STATES CELLULAR CORP
For the period ended Dec 31, 2024. Filed Feb 21, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2024 · Filed Feb 21, 2025
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-K
Period ended 2023-12-31; filed 2024-02-16.
0000821130-24-000007
Item 1A. Risk FactorsCurrent report: 10-K
Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-02-21.
0000821130-25-000023
Item 1A. Risk FactorsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 155 previous paragraphs and 177 current paragraphs.
103 unchanged; 51 reworded; 23 added; 1 removed; 0 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (23)
Current report
Announced Transactions and Strategic Alternatives Review Risk Factors
Current report
1)TDS and UScellular entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of May 24, 2024 with T-Mobile and USCC Wireless Holdings, LLC, pursuant to which, among other things, UScellular has agreed to sell its wireless operations and select spectrum assets to T-Mobile. In addition, UScellular, and certain subsidiaries of UScellular, entered into the Verizon Purchase Agreement on October 17, 2024, and the AT&T Purchase Agreement on November 6, 2024 to sell certain wireless spectrum licenses. There is no guarantee that the transactions contemplated by the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Verizon Purchase Agreement, or the AT&T Purchase Agreement will be able to be consummated or that UScellular will be able to find buyers at mutually agreeable prices for its spectrum assets not subject to the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Verizon Purchase Agreement, or the AT&T Purchase Agreement. Costs and uncertainties related to the transactions could have adverse effects on UScellular's financial condition or results of operations.
Current report
On August 4, 2023, TDS and UScellular announced that the Boards of Directors of both companies decided to initiate a process to explore a range of strategic alternatives for UScellular. As part of this review, on May 28, 2024, UScellular announced that its Board of Directors unanimously approved the execution of the Securities Purchase Agreement pursuant to which, among other things, UScellular has agreed to sell its wireless operations and select spectrum assets to T-Mobile. The Securities Purchase Agreement also contemplates, among other things, a Short-Term Spectrum Manager Lease Agreement and Short-Term Spectrum Manager Sublease Agreements that will become effective at the closing date, which provide T-Mobile with an exclusive license to use certain UScellular spectrum assets and leases at no cost for up to one-year for the purpose of providing continued, uninterrupted service to customers.
Current report
On October 17, 2024, UScellular, and certain subsidiaries of UScellular, entered into the Verizon Purchase Agreement to sell certain AWS, Cellular and PCS wireless spectrum licenses and agreed to grant Verizon certain rights to lease such licenses prior to the transaction close.
Current report
On November 6, 2024, UScellular, and certain subsidiaries of UScellular, entered into the AT&T Purchase Agreement to sell certain 3.45 GHz and 700 MHz wireless spectrum licenses and agreed to grant AT&T certain rights to lease and sub-lease such licenses prior to the transaction close.
Current report
The transactions resulting from the strategic alternatives review are subject to regulatory approval, which UScellular may not be able to obtain on the terms or timeline currently contemplated, or at all. Similarly, UScellular may not be able to satisfy the other closing conditions applicable to each of the transactions, which in the case of the Verizon and AT&T transactions include the closing of the T-Mobile transaction and, for the Verizon transaction, the termination of the T-Mobile Short-Term Spectrum Manager Lease Agreement. The T-Mobile and AT&T transactions include certain wireless spectrum licenses that are held by entities in which UScellular is a non-controlling limited partner. The closing with respect to these wireless spectrum licenses is contingent upon UScellular's purchase, which is pending receipt of regulatory approval, of the remaining equity in the entities that UScellular does not currently own.
Current report
The strategic alternatives review process has already resulted in the incurrence of significant expense primarily related to legal and financial advisors - this is expected to continue. Further, as a result of changes to its spectrum units of accounting, UScellular recognized a significant impairment on its spectrum assets during 2024 and there may be further events and circumstances that occur which may result in additional impairments for the spectrum that is retained, or for the spectrum that is pending sale if such sales do not close as expected.
Current report
There can be no assurance that the strategic alternatives review process, which is ongoing, will result in the transactions or any strategic alternative of any kind being successfully completed or that the process or any outcomes of the process will not have an adverse impact on UScellular's business or financial statements. In addition, UScellular may be unable to find buyers at mutually agreeable prices for its spectrum assets not subject to the recent transactions, including the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Verizon Purchase Agreement, or the AT&T Purchase Agreement.
Current report
See Note 7 — Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to the T-Mobile, Verizon and AT&T transactions, including the uncertainty related to certain portions of the transaction proceeds.
Current report
2)If the T-Mobile, Verizon and AT&T transactions are not consummated, substantial changes will be required to the manner in which UScellular’s wireless business is conducted, and we expect there will be a material adverse effect on UScellular's financial condition and results of operations.
Current report
If the T-Mobile, Verizon and AT&T transactions are not consummated, UScellular would continue to operate its wireless business in an environment of intensifying competitive pressures and limited capital resources. In that scenario, UScellular would be required to develop and implement new strategic plans. The continued operation of the wireless business with its lack of scale and structural disadvantages under these conditions will result in a material adverse effect on UScellular's customers, financial condition and results of operations.
Current report
In addition, if the T-Mobile, Verizon and AT&T transactions are not consummated, the funds contemplated to be received as a result of such transactions would not be available for investment in other UScellular businesses, repayment of debt or the payment of dividends to UScellular stockholders, including TDS.
Current report
Further, if the T-Mobile, Verizon and AT&T transactions are not consummated, UScellular's stock price likely would decline to the extent that the current market price reflects an assumption that the transactions will be completed.
Current report
3)If the T-Mobile, Verizon and AT&T transactions are consummated, substantial costs will be triggered and substantial changes will be required to the manner in which UScellular’s remaining business is conducted, which could have a material adverse effect on UScellular's financial condition and results of operations.
Current report
The successful consummation of the T-Mobile, Verizon and AT&T transactions will trigger substantial costs and require significant changes to the manner in which the UScellular business is operated. In addition, UScellular would, following the closing of the T-Mobile, Verizon and AT&T transactions, be subject to certain business risks that it does not currently face.
Current report
In terms of costs, UScellular expects that the closing of the transaction will trigger or accelerate the recognition of certain cash and non-cash obligations. Such obligations include contingent advisory fees, employee compensation and severance, employee stock award costs, debt extinguishment, income tax expense, administrative costs, restructuring expenses and other wind down costs. Additionally, following the close of the T-Mobile transaction, it is uncertain which towers T-Mobile will choose to locate on, and therefore, it is unknown how many and which towers with no tenants will remain in UScellular's tower portfolio. UScellular expects to incur significant decommissioning costs for certain towers that UScellular elects to retire, and such decommissioning costs are also expected to include remaining obligations under related ground leases. These costs are expected to have a significant impact on UScellular's cash flows and financial statements.
Current report
If the transactions from the strategic alternatives process are successfully completed, the remaining UScellular business, which includes the tower business, interests in certain non-operating equity method investments and wireless spectrum licenses not included in the announced transactions, will be of a significantly smaller scale than its current operations. This could produce operational, cost and borrowing disadvantages relative to its current operations.
Current report
At the T-Mobile closing, UScellular and T-Mobile will enter into a Master License Agreement, pursuant to which, among other things, T-Mobile will lease space on certain additional UScellular-owned towers for a minimum of 15 years and extend the term of certain existing leases to 15 years. If T-Mobile fails to meet its obligations to UScellular, it would likely have an adverse impact on UScellular's business and financial statements.
Current report
In addition, if the transactions are successfully completed, UScellular will retain certain wireless spectrum licenses with FCC build-out requirements that have not yet been satisfied. Such licenses would require significant investments to deploy and if the sale of its wireless operations is completed, UScellular would no longer have an existing wireless business to operate the retained spectrum. Additionally, if the T-Mobile transaction is successfully completed, but the Verizon and AT&T transactions are not completed, UScellular would retain additional wireless spectrum licenses with no existing wireless business to operate the spectrum. As renewal of all wireless spectrum licenses is predicated upon their initial and continued operation in accordance with FCC requirements, such licenses could be subject to forfeiture should UScellular not incur significant expenses to operate the spectrum or engage another carrier to do so. Further, UScellular could fail to monetize remaining spectrum assets including the wireless spectrum licenses that are subject to a Put/Call Agreement with T-Mobile as it is uncertain if the call option will be exercised or if the conditions required to exercise the put option will occur. All of these events could have a significant adverse effect on UScellular’s financial condition and results of operation.
Current report
See Note 7 — Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to the Put/Call Agreement.
Current report
▪Increases in ground lease rates for owned towers;
Current report
See Note 14 — Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to legal proceedings.
Removed paragraphs (1)
Previous report
17)TDS and UScellular have initiated a process to explore a range of strategic alternatives for UScellular and there can be no assurance that any strategic alternative will be successfully identified or completed, that any such strategic alternative will result in additional value for UScellular and its shareholders, or that the process will not have an adverse impact on UScellular's business or financial statements.
Reworded paragraphs (51)
Previous wording
This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including exhibits, contains statements that are not based on historical facts and represent forward-looking statements, as this term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, that address activities, events or developments that UScellular intends, expects, projects, believes, estimates, plans or anticipates will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. The words “believes,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “projects” and similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying them. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, events or developments to be significantly different from any future results, events or developments expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include those set forth below under “Risk Factors” in this Form 10-K. Each of the following risks could have a material adverse effect on UScellular’s business, financial condition or results of operations. However, such factors are not necessarily all of the important factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the forward-looking statements contained in this document. Other unknown or unpredictable factors also could have material adverse effects on future results, performance or achievements. UScellular undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. The reader should carefully consider the following risk factors and other information contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this Form 10-K to understand the material risks relating to UScellular’s business.
Current wording
This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including exhibits, contains statements that are not based on historical facts and represent forward-looking statements, as this term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, that address activities, events or developments that UScellular intends, expects, projects, believes, estimates, plans or anticipates will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. The words “believes,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “projects” and similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying them. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, events or developments to be significantly different from any future results, events or developments expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include those set forth below under “Risk Factors” in this Form 10-K. Each of the following risks could have a material adverse effect on UScellular’s business, financial condition or results of operations. However, such factors are not necessarily all of the important factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the forward-looking statements contained in this document. Other unknown or unpredictable factors also could have material adverse effects on future results, performance or achievements. UScellular undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. The reader should carefully consider the following risk factors and other information contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this Form 10-K to understand the material risks relating to UScellular’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
Previous wording
On August 4, 2023, TDS and UScellular announced that the Boards of Directors of both companies decided to initiate a process to explore a range of strategic alternatives for UScellular. This comprehensive process could result in a diversion of management's attention from UScellular's existing business; a failure to achieve financial and operating objectives; the failure to retain key personnel, customers, business partners or contracts; and volatility in UScellular's stock price. In addition, this process has already resulted in the incurrence of significant expense - this is expected to continue. It is possible that any outcomes of the strategic alternatives review could change the composition of UScellular's long-lived assets, how UScellular may derive cash flows from these assets and may result in uncertainty related to asset recoverability. This may impact UScellular's asset groups for purposes of assessing wireless spectrum licenses and/or property, plant and equipment for impairment and may require in the near term an impairment assessment to be performed which may result in an impairment. There can be no assurance that such comprehensive process will result in any strategic alternative of any kind being successfully identified or completed or that the process or any outcomes of the process will not have an adverse impact on UScellular's business or financial statements.
Current wording
The uncertainty regarding the transactions and continued strategic alternatives review process could result in: a diversion of management's attention from UScellular's existing business; a failure to achieve financial and operating objectives; adverse effects on UScellular's financial condition or results of operations; a failure to retain key personnel, customers, business partners or contracts; and volatility in UScellular's stock price.
Previous wording
10)A failure by UScellular to complete significant network construction and systems implementation activities as part of its plans to improve the quality, coverage, capabilities and capacity of its network, support and other systems and infrastructure could have an adverse effect on its operations.
Current wording
4)A delay or failure by UScellular to complete significant network construction and systems implementation activities as part of its plans to improve the quality, coverage, capabilities and capacity of its network, support and other systems and infrastructure as well as renew wireless spectrum licenses, could adversely affect its operations.
Previous wording
UScellular’s business plan includes significant construction activities and enhancements to its network, support and other systems and infrastructure. Additionally, the deployment of new wireless technologies, including 5G, will require substantial investments in UScellular's wireless network. As UScellular deploys, expands and enhances its network, it may need to acquire additional spectrum. Also, as UScellular continues to build out and enhance its network, UScellular must, among other things, continue to:
Current wording
UScellular’s business plan includes enhancements to its network, support and other systems and infrastructure. UScellular also has the obligation to continue to maintain operation of wireless spectrum licenses that are currently deployed, as well as, FCC build-out requirements for certain wireless spectrum licenses that have not yet been satisfied. Such licenses require significant investments to deploy and the incurrence of ongoing network expenses to operate, as renewal of all wireless spectrum licenses is predicated upon their initial and continued operation in accordance with FCC requirements. Failure to continue to operate a wireless spectrum license or failure to initiate the operation of a spectrum license by the respective FCC build-out deadline could result in forfeiture of such license which could have a material adverse effect on UScellular's business, financial condition or results of operations. Additionally, the deployment of new wireless technologies, including the continued deployment of 5G, will require substantial investments in UScellular's wireless network. Also, as UScellular continues to build out and enhance its network, UScellular must, among other things, continue to:
Previous wording
Any difficulties encountered in completing these activities, as well as problems in vendor equipment availability, labor availability, inflation or other pressures on costs, technical resources, system performance or system adequacy, could delay implementation and deployment of new technologies, delay expansion of operations and product capabilities in new or existing markets or result in increased costs. Failure to successfully deploy new technologies, including 5G, and/or build-out and enhance UScellular’s network, support facilities and other systems and infrastructure in a cost-effective manner, and in a manner that satisfies consumers' expectations for quality and coverage, could have an adverse effect on UScellular’s business, business prospects, financial condition or results of operations.
Current wording
Any difficulties encountered in completing these activities, as well as problems in vendor equipment availability, labor availability, inflation or other pressures on costs, technical resources, system performance or system adequacy, could delay implementation and deployment of new technologies, delay expansion of operations and product capabilities in new or existing markets or result in increased costs. Failure to successfully deploy new technologies, including the continued deployment of 5G, and/or build-out and enhance UScellular’s network, support facilities and other systems and infrastructure in a cost-effective manner, and in a manner that satisfies consumers' expectations for quality and coverage, has adversely affected and could continue to adversely affect UScellular’s business, business prospects, financial condition or results of operations.
Previous wording
1)Intense competition involving products, services, pricing, promotions and network speed and technologies could adversely affect UScellular’s revenues or increase its costs to compete.
Current wording
5)Intense competition involving products, services, pricing, promotions and network speed and technologies could adversely affect UScellular’s revenues or increase its costs to compete.
Previous wording
Competition in the wireless industry is intense and is expected to remain intense in the future due to multiple factors such as increasing market penetration, introduction of new products, new competitors, increasing promotional aggressiveness and changing prices. There is competition in service plan pricing; handsets and other devices; promotional discounts; network quality, coverage, speed and technologies, including 5G technology; distribution; new entrants; bundled services and products, such as content; and other categories. In particular, wireless competition includes aggressive service plan and device pricing, including pricing for unlimited plans, which could result in switching activity and churn and limit UScellular's ability to monetize future growth in data usage. In addition, competition based on network speed may increase as customer demand for higher speeds increases. These competitive factors have resulted in losses of retail connections and UScellular anticipates that they will continue to do so. Similarly, these competitive pressures have caused the prices for services and products to decline and the costs to compete to increase and UScellular anticipates that they will continue to do so.
Current wording
Competition in the wireless industry is intense and is expected to increase in intensity into the foreseeable future due to multiple factors such as increasing market penetration, introduction of new products, new competitors, increasing promotional aggressiveness and changing prices. There is competition in service plan pricing; handsets and other devices; promotional discounts; network quality, coverage, speed and technologies, including 5G technology; distribution; new entrants; bundled services, such as home internet and wireless; and other categories. In particular, wireless competition includes aggressive service plan and device pricing, including pricing for unlimited plans, which could result in switching activity and churn and limit UScellular's ability to monetize future growth in data usage. In addition, competition based on network speed may increase as customer demand for higher speeds increases. These competitive factors have and are expected to continue to result in losses of retail connections, may cause the prices for certain services and products to decline and the costs to compete to increase.
Previous wording
UScellular’s competitors include national or global telecommunications and cable wireless companies that are larger than UScellular, possess greater financial and other resources, possess more extensive coverage areas and more spectrum within their coverage areas, and market other services with their communications services that UScellular does not offer. UScellular and its competitors are actively marketing their deployment of 5G and, as a result, are raising consumer awareness of the technology. If UScellular cannot keep pace with its competitors in deploying 5G or other comparable offerings, or if UScellular's deployment of 5G technology does not result in significant incremental revenues, UScellular's financial condition, results of operations and ability to do business could continue to be adversely affected. In addition, new technologies, services and products that are more commercially effective than the technologies, services and products offered by UScellular may be developed and create new sources of competition. Further, new technologies may be proprietary such that UScellular is not able to adopt such technologies. There can be no assurance that UScellular will be able to compete successfully in this environment.
Current wording
UScellular’s competitors include national or global telecommunications and cable wireless companies that are larger than UScellular, possess greater financial and other resources, possess more extensive coverage areas and more spectrum within their coverage areas, and market other services with their communications services that UScellular does not offer. UScellular and its competitors are actively marketing their deployment of 5G and, as a result, continue to raise consumer awareness of the technology. If UScellular continues to not keep pace with its competitors in deploying 5G or other comparable offerings, or if UScellular's deployment of 5G technology does not result in significant incremental revenues, UScellular's financial condition, results of operations and ability to do business could continue to be adversely affected. In addition, new technologies, services and products that are more commercially effective than the technologies, services and products offered by UScellular may be developed and create new sources of competition. Further, new technologies may be proprietary such that UScellular is not able to adopt such technologies. There can be no assurance that UScellular will be able to compete successfully in this environment.
Previous wording
Sources of competition to UScellular’s business typically include at least four competing wireless telecommunications service providers across UScellular's service area, wireline telecommunications service providers, cable wireless companies, resellers (including MVNOs), and providers of alternative telecommunications services. In particular, competition from cable wireless companies has increased in recent periods, as they have continued to expand their presence in the wireless industry and have offered more competitive pricing. Many of UScellular’s wireless competitors and other competitors have substantially greater financial, technical, marketing, sales, purchasing and distribution resources than UScellular.
Current wording
Sources of competition to UScellular’s business typically include at least four competing wireless telecommunications service providers across UScellular's service area, wireline telecommunications service providers, cable wireless companies, resellers (including MVNOs), and providers of alternative telecommunications services. In particular, competition from cable wireless companies has increased in recent periods and is expected to increase into the foreseeable future, as they have continued to expand their presence in the wireless industry and have offered more competitive pricing. Many of UScellular’s wireless and other competitors have substantially greater financial, technical, marketing, sales, purchasing and distribution resources than UScellular.
Previous wording
Competition in the tower industry is also challenging, as UScellular competes with public and private tower companies, wireless carrier tower alliances, private equity sponsored tower companies, and owners of non-communications sites such as utility towers, rooftop structures, water towers, and other alternative structures. Many of these competitors are larger than UScellular, have greater financial and other resources, have more advantageous tower locations than UScellular, have greater capacity on their towers, and have more scale and coverage nationwide than UScellular – such factors could result in an inability to acquire or build additional towers, difficulty in leasing tower space, or cause lease revenue to decline in the future.
Current wording
Competition in the tower industry is also challenging, as UScellular competes with public and private tower companies, private equity sponsored tower companies, and owners of non-communications sites such as utility towers, rooftop structures, water towers, and other alternative structures. Many of these competitors are larger than UScellular, have greater financial and other resources, have more advantageous tower locations than UScellular, have greater capacity on their towers, and have more scale and coverage nationwide than UScellular – such factors could result in an inability to acquire or build additional towers, difficulty in leasing tower space or renewing leases, or cause lease revenue to decline in the future.
Previous wording
4)UScellular’s smaller scale relative to larger competitors that may have greater financial and other resources than UScellular could cause UScellular to be unable to compete successfully, which could adversely affect its business, financial condition or results of operations.
Current wording
6)UScellular’s lack of scale and structural disadvantages relative to larger competitors that may have greater financial and other resources than UScellular has caused and could continue to cause UScellular to be unable to compete successfully, which has adversely affected and could continue to adversely affect its business, financial condition or results of operations.
Previous wording
UScellular has smaller scale efficiencies compared to larger competitors. UScellular may be unable to compete successfully with larger companies that have substantially greater financial, technical, marketing, sales, purchasing and distribution resources or that offer more services than UScellular, which could adversely affect UScellular’s revenues and costs of doing business. Specifically, UScellular’s smaller scale relative to most of its competitors could have the following impacts, among others:
Current wording
UScellular has lack of scale and structural disadvantages compared to larger competitors. UScellular may be unable to compete successfully with larger companies that have substantially greater financial, technical, marketing, sales, purchasing and distribution resources or that offer more services than UScellular, which has adversely affected and could continue to adversely affect UScellular’s revenues and costs of doing business. Specifically, UScellular’s lack of scale and structural disadvantages relative to most of its competitors could have the following impacts, among others:
Previous wording
▪Increased operating and capital expenditure costs due to lack of leverage with vendors;
Current wording
▪Increased operating and capital expenditure costs due to lack of leverage with vendors and dispersed geography;
Previous wording
2)Changes in roaming practices or other factors could cause UScellular's roaming revenues to decline from current levels, roaming expenses to increase from current levels and/or impact UScellular's ability to service its customers in geographic areas where UScellular does not have its own network, which could have an adverse effect on UScellular's business, financial condition or results of operations.
Current wording
7)Changes in roaming practices or other factors could cause UScellular's roaming revenues to decline from current levels, roaming expenses to increase from current levels and/or impact UScellular's ability to service its customers in geographic areas where UScellular does not have its own network, which could have an adverse effect on UScellular's business, financial condition or results of operations.
Previous wording
UScellular’s service revenues include roaming revenues related to the use of UScellular’s network by other carriers’ customers who travel within UScellular’s coverage areas. Changes in FCC rules or actions, industry practices or the network footprints of carriers could have an adverse effect on UScellular’s roaming revenues. For example, the expansion of other carriers' network coverage in UScellular's footprint and/or lower roaming rates with other carriers could continue to decrease future roaming revenues for UScellular.
Current wording
UScellular’s service revenues include roaming revenues related to the use of UScellular’s network by other carriers’ customers who travel within UScellular’s coverage areas. Changes in FCC rules or actions, industry practices or the network footprints of carriers could have an adverse effect on UScellular’s roaming revenues. For example, the expansion of other carriers' network coverage in UScellular's footprint and/or lower roaming rates with other carriers has decreased and is expected to continue to decrease roaming revenues for UScellular.
Previous wording
3)An inability to attract diverse people of outstanding talent throughout all levels of the organization, to develop their potential through education and assignments, and to retain them by keeping them engaged, challenged and properly rewarded could have an adverse effect on UScellular's business, financial condition or results of operations.
Current wording
8)An inability to attract people of outstanding talent throughout all levels of the organization, to develop their potential through education and assignments, and to retain them by keeping them engaged, challenged and properly rewarded could have an adverse effect on UScellular's business, financial condition or results of operations.
Previous wording
UScellular’s business is highly technical and competition for skilled talent in the wireless industry is intense. Due to competition, limited supply, and/or rising wage levels for qualified management, technical, sales and other personnel, there can be no assurance that UScellular will be able to continue to attract and/or retain people of outstanding potential for the development of its business. In addition, a person's expectation of an in-office, remote or hybrid working model could negatively affect talent acquisition and retention. The loss of existing key personnel due to competition, wage levels and/or retirements, the failure to recruit highly skilled and diverse personnel in a timely and cost-effective manner, the inability to foster and maintain a diverse and inclusive work environment, or failure to maintain its commitment to environmental and social responsibility could have an adverse effect on UScellular’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
Current wording
UScellular’s business is highly technical and competition for skilled talent in the wireless industry is intense. Due to competition, limited supply, and/or rising wage levels for qualified management, technical, sales and other personnel, there can be no assurance that UScellular will be able to continue to attract and/or retain people of outstanding potential for the development of its business. In addition, a person's expectation of an in-office, remote or hybrid working model could negatively affect talent acquisition and retention. The loss of existing key personnel due to competition, wage levels and/or retirements, the failure to recruit highly skilled personnel in a timely and cost-effective manner, the inability to foster and maintain an inclusive work environment, or failure to maintain its commitment to environmental and social responsibility could have an adverse effect on UScellular’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
Previous wording
5)Changes in various business factors, including changes in demand, consumer preferences and perceptions, price competition, churn from customer switching activity and other factors, could have an adverse effect on UScellular’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
Current wording
9)Changes in various business factors, including changes in demand, consumer preferences and perceptions, price competition, cost increases, churn from customer switching activity and other factors, could have an adverse effect on UScellular’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
Previous wording
6)A failure by UScellular to obtain access to adequate radio spectrum to meet current or anticipated future needs and/or to accurately predict future needs for radio spectrum could have an adverse effect on UScellular’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
Current wording
10)A failure by UScellular to obtain access to adequate radio spectrum to meet current or anticipated future needs and/or to accurately predict future needs for radio spectrum could have an adverse effect on UScellular’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
Previous wording
UScellular’s business depends on the ability to use portions of the radio spectrum licensed by the FCC. UScellular could fail to obtain access to sufficient spectrum capacity, including spectrum needed to support 5G and future technologies, in new or existing markets, whether through FCC auctions or other transactions, to meet the anticipated spectrum requirements associated with increased demand for existing services, especially increases in customer demand for data services and network speed, and to enable deployment of next-generation services. UScellular believes that this increased demand for data services and network speed reflects a trend that will continue for the foreseeable future. Data usage, including usage under unlimited plans, could exceed current forecasts resulting in a need for increased investment in spectrum or other network components. UScellular could fail to accurately forecast its future spectrum requirements considering changes in plan offerings, customer usage patterns, spectrum build-out and technology requirements and the expanded demands of new services. Such a failure could have an adverse impact on the quality of UScellular’s services or UScellular’s ability to roll out such future services in some markets, could require that UScellular curtail existing services to make spectrum available for next-generation services, or UScellular could be effectively capped in increasing market share. As spectrum constrained providers gain customers, they use up their network capacity. Since they lack spectrum, they can respond to demand only by adding cell sites, which is capital intensive, adds fixed operating costs, is limited by zoning considerations, and ultimately may not be cost effective. Further, a spectrum constrained provider will generally not be able to achieve the data speeds that other competitors with more spectrum are able to provide.
Current wording
UScellular’s business depends on the ability to use portions of the radio spectrum licensed by the FCC. UScellular could fail to obtain access to sufficient spectrum capacity, including spectrum needed to support future technologies, in new or existing markets, whether through FCC auctions or other transactions, to meet the anticipated spectrum requirements associated with increased demand for existing services, especially increases in customer demand for data services and network speed, and to enable deployment of next-generation services. UScellular believes that this increased demand for data services and network speed reflects a trend that will continue for the foreseeable future. Data usage, including usage under unlimited plans, could exceed current forecasts resulting in a need for increased investment in spectrum or other network components. UScellular could fail to accurately forecast its future spectrum requirements considering changes in plan offerings, customer usage patterns, spectrum build-out and technology requirements and the expanded demands of new services. Such a failure could have an adverse impact on the quality of UScellular’s services or UScellular’s ability to roll out such future services in some markets, could require that UScellular curtail existing services to make spectrum available for next-generation services, or UScellular could be effectively capped in increasing market share. As spectrum constrained providers gain customers, they use up their network capacity. Since they lack spectrum, they can respond to demand only by adding cell sites, which is capital intensive, adds fixed operating costs, is limited by zoning considerations, and ultimately may not be cost effective. Further, a spectrum constrained provider will generally not be able to achieve the data speeds that other competitors with more spectrum are able to provide.
Previous wording
7)Advances or changes in technology could render certain technologies used by UScellular obsolete, could put UScellular at a competitive disadvantage, could reduce UScellular’s revenues or could increase its costs of doing business.
Current wording
11)Advances or changes in technology could render certain technologies used by UScellular obsolete, could put UScellular at a competitive disadvantage, could reduce UScellular’s revenues or could increase its costs of doing business.
Previous wording
8)Complexities associated with deploying new technologies present substantial risk and UScellular investments in unproven technologies may not produce the benefits that UScellular expects.
Current wording
12)Complexities associated with deploying new technologies present substantial risk and UScellular investments in unproven technologies may not produce the benefits that UScellular expects.
Previous wording
UScellular is deploying 5G technology in its network and has launched commercial 5G services in portions of substantially all of its markets. The continued deployment of 5G technology will require substantial additional investments in UScellular's wireless networks to remain competitive in the industry. Transition to 5G or other new technologies involves significant time, cost and risk, and anticipated products and revenues may not be realized. Furthermore, the wireless business experiences rapid technology changes and new services and products. If UScellular fails to effectively deploy new wireless technologies, services or products on a timely basis, this could have an adverse impact on UScellular’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
UScellular is deploying 5G technology in its network and has launched commercial 5G services in portions of substantially all of its markets. The continued deployment of 5G technology will require substantial additional investments in UScellular's wireless networks to remain competitive in the industry. Transition to 5G or other new technologies involves significant time, cost and risk, and anticipated products and revenues may not be realized. Due to its lack of scale, UScellular has higher costs per subscriber than its larger competitors and is balancing the timing of investments, such as its 5G deployment, with liquidity constraints. Furthermore, the wireless business experiences rapid changes in technology and services and products. If UScellular fails to effectively deploy new wireless technologies, services or products on a timely basis, this could have an adverse impact on UScellular’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
9)Costs, integration problems or other factors associated with acquisitions, divestitures or exchanges of properties or wireless spectrum licenses and/or expansion of UScellular’s business could have an adverse effect on UScellular’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
Current wording
13)Costs, integration problems or other factors associated with acquisitions, divestitures or exchanges of properties or wireless spectrum licenses and/or expansion of UScellular’s business could have an adverse effect on UScellular’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
Previous wording
As part of UScellular’s operating strategy, UScellular from time to time may be engaged in the acquisition, divestiture or exchange of companies, businesses, strategic properties, wireless spectrum or other assets. UScellular may change the markets in which it operates and the services that it provides through such acquisitions, divestitures and/or exchanges. In general, UScellular may not disclose the negotiation of such transactions until a definitive agreement has been reached.
Current wording
UScellular has entered into and may continue to enter into agreements to divest of companies, businesses, wireless spectrum and other assets. UScellular may also be engaged in the acquisition, divestitures or exchange of companies, businesses, strategic properties, wireless spectrum or other assets. UScellular may change the markets in which it operates and the services that it provides through such acquisitions, divestitures and/or exchanges. In general, UScellular may not disclose the negotiation of such transactions until a definitive agreement has been reached.
Previous wording
11)Difficulties involving third parties with which UScellular does business, including changes in UScellular's relationships with or financial or operational difficulties, including supply chain disruptions, of key suppliers or independent agents and third-party national retailers who market UScellular’s services, could adversely affect UScellular's business, financial condition or results of operations.
Current wording
14)Difficulties involving third parties with which UScellular does business, including changes in UScellular's relationships with or financial or operational difficulties, including supply chain disruptions, of key suppliers or independent agents and third-party national retailers who market UScellular’s services, could adversely affect UScellular's business, financial condition or results of operations.
Previous wording
Operation of UScellular’s supply chain and management of its device inventory and network equipment require accurate forecasting of customer growth and demand. If overall demand for wireless devices or the mix of demand for wireless devices is significantly different than UScellular’s expectations, UScellular could face inadequate or excess supplies of particular models of wireless devices. This could result in lost sales opportunities or an excess supply of device inventory or network equipment that may need to be written down, depreciated, or disposed of for a loss. If network equipment is not available or requires extended lead times due to supply chain challenges, or if overall demand for wireless services or the mix of demand for wireless services is significantly different than UScellular’s expectations, UScellular may not be able to adequately maintain a network that supports customer demand. Further, UScellular's supply chain could be disrupted unexpectedly by raw material shortages, wars, natural disasters, disease or other factors. Supply chain disruptions may result in limited component availability, constraints on certain devices, extended lead times, delayed construction and additional uncertainty.
Current wording
Operation of UScellular’s supply chain and management of its device inventory and network equipment require accurate forecasting of customer growth and demand. If overall demand for wireless devices or the mix of demand for wireless devices is significantly different than UScellular’s expectations, UScellular could face inadequate or excess supplies of particular models of wireless devices. This could result in lost sales opportunities or an excess supply of device inventory that may need to be written down, depreciated, or disposed of for a loss. If network equipment is not available or requires extended lead times due to supply chain challenges, or if overall demand for wireless services or the mix of demand for wireless services is significantly different than UScellular’s expectations, UScellular may not be able to adequately maintain a network that supports customer demand. Also, if UScellular fails to accurately forecast customer usage and network demands, UScellular may have excess supply of network equipment inventory that may need to be written down, depreciated or disposed at a loss. Further, UScellular's supply chain could be disrupted unexpectedly by raw material shortages, wars, natural disasters, disease or other factors. Supply chain disruptions may result in limited component availability, constraints on certain devices, extended lead times, delayed construction and additional uncertainty.
Previous wording
12)A failure by UScellular to maintain flexible and capable telecommunication networks or information technologies, or a material disruption thereof, could have an adverse effect on UScellular’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
Current wording
15)A failure by UScellular to maintain flexible and capable telecommunication networks or information technologies, or a material disruption thereof, could have an adverse effect on UScellular’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
Previous wording
13)Uncertainty in UScellular’s or TDS' future cash flow and liquidity or the inability to access capital, deterioration in the capital markets, changes in interest rates, other changes in UScellular’s or TDS' performance or market conditions, changes in UScellular’s or TDS' credit ratings or other factors could limit or restrict the availability of financing on terms and prices acceptable to UScellular, which has required and could in the future require UScellular to reduce or delay its construction, development or acquisition programs, reduce the amount of wireless spectrum licenses acquired, divest assets or businesses, and/or reduce or cease share repurchases.
Current wording
16)Uncertainty in UScellular’s or TDS' future cash flow and liquidity or the inability to access capital, deterioration in the capital markets, changes in interest rates, other changes in UScellular’s or TDS' performance or market conditions, changes in UScellular’s or TDS' credit ratings or other factors could limit or restrict the availability of financing on terms and prices acceptable to UScellular, which has required and could in the future require UScellular to reduce or delay its construction, development or acquisition programs, divest assets or businesses, and/or reduce or cease share repurchases.
Previous wording
UScellular’s credit rating currently is sub-investment grade. UScellular has incurred negative free cash flow (defined as Cash flows from operating activities less Cash paid for additions to property, plant and equipment and less Cash paid for software license agreements) at times in the past and this could occur in the future. UScellular may require substantial additional capital for, among other uses, acquisitions of providers of telecommunications services or products, spectrum license or system acquisitions, capital expenditures, the repurchase of shares, or making additional investments. There can be no assurance that sufficient funds will continue to be available to UScellular or its subsidiaries on terms or at prices acceptable to UScellular. Insufficient cash flows from operating activities, changes in UScellular's credit ratings, defaults of the terms of debt or credit agreements, uncertainty of access to capital, deterioration in the capital markets, reduced regulatory capital at banks which in turn limits their ability to lend, other changes in the performance of UScellular or in market conditions or other factors could limit or restrict the availability of financing on terms and prices acceptable to UScellular, which could require UScellular to reduce its acquisition, capital expenditure and business development programs, reduce the acquisition and development of wireless spectrum licenses, divest assets and/or reduce or cease share repurchases. UScellular cannot provide assurance that circumstances that could have a material adverse effect on its liquidity or capital resources will not occur.
Current wording
UScellular’s credit rating currently is sub-investment grade. UScellular has incurred negative free cash flow (defined as Cash flows from operating activities less Cash paid for additions to property, plant and equipment and less Cash paid for software license agreements) at times in past periods, and this could occur in future periods. UScellular may require substantial additional capital for, among other uses, capital expenditures, acquisitions, investments in new technologies, and the repurchase of shares. There can be no assurance that sufficient funds will continue to be available to UScellular or its subsidiaries on terms or at prices acceptable to UScellular. Insufficient cash flows from operating activities, changes in UScellular's credit ratings, defaults of the terms of debt or credit agreements, uncertainty of access to capital, deterioration in the capital markets, reduced regulatory capital at banks which in turn limits their ability to lend, other changes in the performance of UScellular or in market conditions or other factors could limit or restrict the availability of financing on terms and prices acceptable to UScellular, which could require UScellular to reduce its capital expenditure, acquisition and business development programs, reduce the development of wireless spectrum licenses, divest assets and/or reduce or cease share repurchases. Due to its lack of scale, UScellular has higher costs per subscriber than its competitors and is balancing the timing of investments, such as its 5G deployment, with liquidity constraints. UScellular cannot provide assurance that circumstances that could have a material adverse effect on its liquidity or capital resources will not occur.
Previous wording
14)UScellular has a significant amount of indebtedness which could adversely affect its financial performance and in turn adversely affect its ability to make payments on its indebtedness, comply with terms of debt covenants and incur additional debt.
Current wording
17)UScellular has a significant amount of indebtedness which could adversely affect its financial performance and in turn adversely affect its ability to make payments on its indebtedness, comply with terms of debt covenants and incur additional debt.
Previous wording
UScellular has a significant amount of indebtedness and may need to incur additional indebtedness. UScellular’s level of indebtedness could have important consequences. For example, it (i) may limit UScellular’s ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures or general corporate purposes, particularly if the ratings assigned to its debt securities by rating organizations are revised downward; (ii) will require UScellular to dedicate a substantial portion of its cash flow from operations to the payment of interest and principal on its debt, thereby reducing the funds available to UScellular for other purposes including expansion through acquisitions, capital expenditures, acquisition of wireless spectrum licenses, marketing spending and expansion of its business; and (iii) may limit UScellular’s flexibility to adjust to changing business and market conditions and make UScellular more vulnerable to a downturn in general economic conditions as compared to UScellular’s competitors. UScellular’s ability to make scheduled payments on its indebtedness or to refinance it will depend on its financial and operating performance which, in turn, is subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and other factors beyond its control. A substantial portion of UScellular's debt is subject to variable interest rates, which has increased interest expense in recent periods and UScellular will continue to be vulnerable to unfavorable changes in market interest rates.
Current wording
UScellular has a significant amount of indebtedness and may need to incur additional indebtedness. UScellular’s level of indebtedness could have important consequences. For example, it (i) may limit UScellular’s ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures or general corporate purposes, particularly if the ratings assigned to its debt securities by rating organizations are revised downward; (ii) will require UScellular to dedicate a substantial portion of its cash flow from operations to the payment of interest and principal on its debt, thereby reducing the funds available to UScellular for other purposes including expansion through acquisitions, capital expenditures, acquisition of wireless spectrum licenses, marketing spending and expansion of its business; and (iii) may limit UScellular’s flexibility to adjust to changing business and market conditions and make UScellular more vulnerable to a downturn in general economic conditions as compared to UScellular’s competitors. UScellular’s ability to make scheduled payments on its indebtedness or to refinance it will depend on its financial and operating performance which, in turn, is subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and other factors beyond its control. A substantial portion of UScellular's debt is subject to variable interest rates, which causes UScellular to be vulnerable to unfavorable changes in market interest rates.
Previous wording
UScellular’s revolving credit agreement, term loan agreement, export credit financing agreement and receivables securitization agreement require UScellular to comply with certain affirmative and negative covenants, including certain financial covenants. Depending on the actual financial performance of UScellular, there is a risk that UScellular could fail to satisfy the required financial covenants. This risk has increased with UScellular's recent financial and operating performance. If UScellular breaches a financial or other covenant of any of these agreements, it would result in a default under that agreement, and could involve a cross-default under other debt instruments. This could in turn cause the affected lenders to accelerate the repayment of principal and accrued interest on any outstanding debt under such agreements and, if they choose, terminate the agreement. If appropriate, UScellular may request an amendment to one or more credit agreements to adjust financial covenants to provide additional financial flexibility to UScellular, and may also seek other changes to such agreements. There is no assurance that the lenders will agree to any amendments. If the lenders agree to amendments, this may result in additional payments or higher interest rates payable to the lenders and/or additional restrictions. Restrictions with such debt instruments may limit UScellular’s operating and financial flexibility.
Current wording
UScellular’s revolving credit agreement, term loan agreements, export credit financing agreement and receivables securitization agreement require UScellular to comply with certain affirmative and negative covenants, including certain financial covenants. Depending on the actual financial performance of UScellular, there is a risk that UScellular could fail to satisfy the required financial covenants. This risk has increased with UScellular's recent financial and operating performance. If UScellular breaches a financial or other covenant of any of these agreements, it would result in a default under that agreement, and could involve a cross-default under other debt instruments. This could in turn cause the affected lenders to accelerate the repayment of principal and accrued interest on any outstanding debt under such agreements and, if they choose, terminate the agreement. If appropriate, UScellular may request an amendment to one or more credit agreements to adjust financial covenants to provide additional financial flexibility to UScellular, and may also seek other changes to such agreements. There is no assurance that the lenders will agree to any amendments. If the lenders agree to amendments, this may result in additional payments or higher interest rates payable to the lenders and/or additional restrictions. Restrictions with such debt instruments may limit UScellular’s operating and financial flexibility.
Previous wording
15)UScellular’s assets and revenue are concentrated in the U.S. wireless telecommunications industry. Consequently, its operating results may fluctuate based on factors related primarily to conditions in this industry.
Current wording
18)UScellular’s assets and revenue are concentrated in the U.S. wireless telecommunications industry. Consequently, its operating results may fluctuate based on factors related primarily to conditions in this industry.
Previous wording
The U.S. wireless telecommunications industry is facing significant change and an uncertain operating environment. UScellular’s focus on the U.S. wireless telecommunications industry, together with its sub-scale position relative to larger competitors with greater resources within the industry, may represent increased risk for investors due to the lack of diversification. This could have an adverse effect on UScellular’s ability to attain and sustain long-term, profitable revenue growth and could have an adverse effect on its business, financial condition or results of operations.
Current wording
The U.S. wireless telecommunications industry is facing significant change and an uncertain operating environment. UScellular’s focus on the U.S. wireless telecommunications industry, together with its lack of scale relative to larger competitors with greater resources within the industry, may represent increased risk for investors due to the lack of diversification. This could have an adverse effect on UScellular’s ability to attain and sustain long-term, profitable revenue growth and could have an adverse effect on its business, financial condition or results of operations.
Previous wording
16)UScellular has significant investments in entities that it does not control. Losses in the value of such investments could have an adverse effect on UScellular’s financial condition or results of operations.
Current wording
19)UScellular has significant investments in entities that it does not control. Losses in the value of such investments could have an adverse effect on UScellular’s financial condition or results of operations.
Previous wording
UScellular has significant investments in entities that it does not control, including equity investments and interests in certain variable interest entities. UScellular’s interests in such entities do not provide UScellular with control over the business strategy, financial goals, network build-out plans or other operational aspects of these entities. UScellular cannot provide assurance that these entities will operate in a manner that will increase or maintain the value of UScellular’s investments, that UScellular’s proportionate share of income from these investments will continue at the current level in the future or that UScellular will not incur losses from the holding of such investments. Losses in the values of such investments or a reduction in income from these investments could adversely affect UScellular’s financial condition or results of operations. In addition, certain investments have historically contributed significant cash flows to UScellular and a reduction or suspension of such cash flows could adversely affect UScellular’s financial condition.
Current wording
UScellular has significant investments in entities that it does not control, including equity investments and interests in certain variable interest entities. UScellular’s interests in such entities do not provide UScellular with control over the business strategy, financial goals, network build-out plans or other operational aspects of these entities. UScellular cannot provide assurance that these entities will operate in a manner that will increase or maintain the value of UScellular’s investments, that UScellular’s proportionate share of income from these investments will continue at the current level in the future or that UScellular will not incur losses from the holding of such investments. Losses in the values of such investments or a reduction in income from these investments could adversely affect UScellular’s financial condition or results of operations. In addition, certain investments have historically contributed significant cash flows to UScellular and a reduction or suspension of such cash flows could adversely affect UScellular’s cash flows and financial condition.
Previous wording
18)Failure by UScellular to timely or fully comply with any existing applicable legislative and/or regulatory requirements or changes thereto could adversely affect UScellular’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
Current wording
20)Failure by UScellular to timely or fully comply with any existing applicable legislative and/or regulatory requirements or changes thereto could adversely affect UScellular’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
Previous wording
UScellular’s operations are subject to varying degrees of regulation by the FCC, state public utility commissions and other federal, state and local regulatory agencies and legislative bodies. Various regulatory agencies and legislative bodies could implement different policies with respect to many federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to changes to fiscal and tax policies, trade policies, tariffs on import goods and climate change. New or amended regulatory requirements could increase UScellular’s costs and divert resources from other initiatives. Adverse decisions, increased regulation, or changes to existing regulation by regulatory bodies could negatively impact UScellular’s operations by, among other things, restricting energy consumption or access to grid electricity, permitting greater competition or limiting UScellular’s ability to engage in certain sales or marketing activities, or retention and recruitment of skilled resources. New regulatory mandates or enforcement may require unexpected or increased capital expenditures, lost revenues, higher operating expenses or other changes. Court decisions and rulemakings could have a substantial impact on UScellular’s operations, including rulemakings on broadband access to the internet, intercarrier access compensation, state and federal support funding and court decisions regarding the FCC's universal service fund program or, more broadly, the scope of authority of the federal agencies that regulate UScellular. Litigation and different objectives among federal and state regulators could create uncertainty and delay UScellular’s ability to respond to new regulations. Further, wireless spectrum licenses are subject to renewal by the FCC and could be revoked in the event of a violation of applicable laws or regulatory requirements. Also, although FCC rules relating to net neutrality have been repealed, on October 19, 2023, the FCC adopted a draft Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that proposes to reinstate such rules and reclassify broadband internet access service as a telecommunications service under Title II of the Communications Act of 1934. In the interim, some state legislators and regulators are seeking to or have already enacted state net neutrality laws and regulations, and it is unclear whether more states will seek to do so now that the FCC has announced its intent to reinstate net neutrality rules. Interpretation and application of these rules and of rules relating to other recent NPRMs issued by the FCC (for example, with respect to digital discrimination), including conflicts between federal and state laws, may result in additional costs for compliance and may limit opportunities to derive profits from certain business practices or resources.
Current wording
UScellular’s operations are subject to varying degrees of regulation by the FCC, state public utility commissions and other federal, state and local regulatory agencies and legislative bodies. Changes in the administration of the various regulatory agencies and legislative bodies are resulting in and could continue to result in different policies with respect to many federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to changes to fiscal and tax policies, trade policies, tariffs on imported goods, climate change and workforce-related practices. New or amended regulatory requirements could increase UScellular’s costs and divert resources from other initiatives. Adverse decisions, increased regulation, or changes to existing regulation by regulatory bodies could negatively impact UScellular’s operations by, among other things, restricting energy consumption or access to grid electricity, permitting greater competition or limiting UScellular’s ability to engage in certain sales or marketing activities, or retention and recruitment of skilled resources. New regulatory mandates or enforcement may require unexpected or increased capital expenditures, lost revenues, higher operating expenses or other changes. Court decisions and rulemakings could have a substantial impact on UScellular’s operations, including rulemakings on broadband access to the internet, intercarrier access compensation, state and federal support funding and court decisions regarding the FCC's universal service fund program or, more broadly, the scope of authority of the federal agencies that regulate UScellular. Litigation and different objectives among federal and state regulators could create uncertainty and delay UScellular’s ability to respond to new regulations. Further, wireless spectrum licenses are subject to renewal by the FCC and could be revoked in the event of a violation of applicable laws or regulatory requirements. Also, the FCC recently renewed its decision to regulate Broadband Internet Access Service (BIAS), including reclassifying BIAS as a telecommunications service under Title II of the Communications Act and mobile BIAS as a commercial mobile radio service. However, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals struck down the FCC’s Order, halting implementation. Some state legislators and regulators are seeking to or have already enacted state net neutrality laws and regulations, and it is unclear whether more states will seek to do so. Interpretation and application of these rules and of rules relating to other recent NPRMs issued by the FCC (for example, with respect to digital discrimination), including conflicts between federal and state laws, may result in additional costs for compliance and may limit opportunities to derive profits from certain business practices or resources.
Previous wording
19)UScellular receives significant regulatory support, and is also subject to numerous surcharges and fees from federal, state and local governments – the applicability and the amount of the support and fees are subject to great uncertainty, including the ability to pass through certain fees to customers, and this uncertainty could have an adverse effect on UScellular’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
Current wording
21)UScellular receives significant regulatory support, and is also subject to numerous surcharges and fees from federal, state and local governments – the applicability and the amount of the support and fees are subject to uncertainty, including the ability to pass through certain fees to customers, and this uncertainty could have an adverse effect on UScellular’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
Showing the first 40 of 51 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.